U.S. Army Captain Michael Kelvington, commander of the Battle company, 1-508 Parachute Infantry battalion, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, bows next to remains of Gulam Dostager, a member of Afghan Local Police who was killed in the blast of an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) during the joint Tor Janda (Black Flag in Pashtu) operation, in Zahri district of Kandahar province, southern Afghanistan May 25, 2012.  REUTERS/Shamil Zhumatov  (AFGHANISTAN - Tags: MILITARY CIVIL UNREST CONFLICT TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Members of the U.S. Navy Blue Angels fly over the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan as part of the 25th annual Fleet Week celebration in New York, May 23, 2012.  REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz (UNITED STATES - Tags: MILITARY ANNIVERSARY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Fleet Week

The U.S. Navy takes Manhattan for a week.  Slideshow 

Photo

The SpaceX mission

A privately owned unmanned rocket blasts off on a mission to be the first commercial flight to the International Space Station.  Slideshow 

U.N. panel on Gaza flotilla incident begins work

Related Topics

UNITED NATIONS | Tue Aug 10, 2010 5:14pm EDT

UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) - The United Nations sought to head off any potential clash with Israel over a U.N. inquiry into a deadly Israeli assault on a Gaza-bound aid flotilla, as a panel began work on the task on Tuesday.

A U.N. statement on an inaugural meeting between the four-man team and Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon stressed that the inquiry was "not designed to determine individual criminal responsibility." Instead it would "examine and identify the facts, circumstances and the context of the incident."

Ban set up the inquiry last week into the May 31 raid in which Israeli commandos killed nine Turkish pro-Palestinian activists after boarding their vessel, which was attempting to run Israel's blockade of the Gaza Strip. Israel said the activists had tried to violently resist the boarding.

The action led to a sharp deterioration in Israeli-Turkish relations and forced Israel to ease the blockade of Gaza, which the Jewish state says is to prevent Palestinian Hamas militants from acquiring the military capability to attack Israel.

Israel, which has completed its own military investigation of the incident and started a civilian one, eventually agreed -- at what diplomats said was the urging of the United States -- to cooperate with the investigative panel set up by Ban.

After meeting Ban, the panel led by former New Zealand Prime Minister Geoffrey Palmer and including Israeli and Turkish representatives met to consider how to go about its task, the United Nations said.

The U.N. statement said Ban had told the panel "they should seek the fullest cooperation of the national authorities" -- a reference to Israel and Turkey.

POINT OF FRICTION

One possible point of friction with Israel has already emerged after Ban denied on Monday that the world body had struck a secret deal with the Jewish state not to call Israeli soldiers to testify. "There was no such agreement behind the scenes," he told reporters.

Ban's comment prompted a sharp rejoinder from Israeli government spokesman Mark Regev that "Israel will not cooperate with, and will not participate in, a panel that demands to investigate Israeli soldiers." Regev did not say whether there had been a deal on the issue.

Questioned by reporters at a news briefing, U.N. spokesman Martin Nesirky referred to but did not repeat Ban's comment. He defended a decision not to publish the panel's mandate, saying disclosure was "not normal practice."

Asked whether the panel would have any power to subpoena witnesses -- a term signifying legal compulsion -- to appear before it, Nesirky said, "Absolutely not." But he did not say whether the team might still ask to talk to Israelis.

"It will be for the panel to decide how they work and what they ask for," he said.

One of the panel's tasks will be to study the results of both Israeli and Turkish investigations of the flotilla incident, but Nesirky said its work would not be limited to that. "It goes well beyond simply reviewing reports," he said.

The panel is also asked to recommend how to avoid a repeat of the flotilla incident.

Turkey and Israel appeared still far apart over the incident. Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu said Israel should admit sole responsibility for the deaths, while Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak said the Jewish state had exhausted all other options before carrying out its raid.

The panel has started work on the inquiry in New York and is scheduled to issue a preliminary report by September 15.

(Editing by Chris Wilson)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (7)
gunste wrote:
If an Iranian ship decided to land people and goods on the shores of the US, they would be stopped by the US Navy. If they failed to obey to heave to and be boarded, they would be treated just like the Turkish ship was.
The incident was premeditated and the boarding and resistance was planned to cause an international outcry. Resisting arrest and the orders of the authorities have the same result all over the world.
What would China, North Korea have done? What is Australia doing about unauthorized entry from boats at its shores?

Aug 10, 2010 5:34pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
colindale wrote:
The killing of nine unarmed passengers on board an aid ship carrying supplies for Gaza by heavily-armed, attacking troops, under cover of darkness, is just a taste of things to come.

US-armed Israel with its secret stockpile of hundreds of thermo-nuclear warheads (that are hidden from the world as the Israeli government has refused inspection by the UN’s International Atomic Energy Agency), is very likely to be the first state to deploy these weapons against its enemies – and that apocalyptic event could be any time soon, next week, next month .. and probably as a result of an attack against Iran.

Do not be misled into thinking that Israel’s massive, nuclear arsenal, that has been covertly constructed since the death of JFK, is there purely for reasons of deterrence, for that would require in the region of only 4 or 5 warheads, not between 250 and 400, as has now been estimated by American scientists.

And (nuclear) Israel stands nearly dead-centre of the most volatile, unstable and dangerous region in the world. It is also argued that the extraordinary actions of successive American administrations in deliberately escalating the arms race in the Middle East, have virtually ensured that the above deadly scenario will be enacted within the very near future, if the UN SC and the EU do not act now to proclaim the Middle East a nuclear-weapons-free-zone that would include both Iran and Israel.

Aug 10, 2010 6:09pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
todonada wrote:
gunste

Gaza is not Israel so your argument is based on a false premise.

Apart from this, civilized countries have neither need nor desire to drop black-clad heavily armed commandos unto peaceful ships in the dead of night in international waters.

Stop making excuses for a failed state.

Aug 10, 2010 7:16pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.