Social Security back in campaign spotlight

Related Topics

WASHINGTON | Fri Aug 13, 2010 5:56pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. Democrats renewed a traditional election-year battle over Social Security on Friday, launching a campaign to warn seniors that Republican proposals would undermine the popular retirement program.

Democrats said Republican plans to let seniors invest some of their Social Security funds in the stock market would threaten retirees' financial security.

"The Republicans advocating these changes are not friends of senior citizens," Democratic National Committee Chairman Tim Kaine said ahead of Saturday's 75th anniversary of President Franklin Roosevelt's signing of the Social Security law.

Democrats plan events around the country to celebrate the anniversary and highlight Republican candidates who have called for some form of privatization of Social Security.

Republicans said the attacks were designed to put the focus on something other than President Barack Obama's economic failures as Democrats struggle to keep their majorities in Congress ahead of the November 2 elections.

"Democrats in Washington are desperate to shift attention away from their reckless spending record and failure to create jobs," said Brian Walsh of the Republican Senate campaign committee.

A report last week said Social Security would exhaust its reserves in 2037, but lawmakers have been unable to find ways to boost the program, battling over proposals to cut benefits, hike taxes or raise the retirement age.

Republican President George W. Bush's push to add personal retirement accounts failed in 2005 in the face of heavy Democratic and public opposition. Democrats said it would be more foolish now after the upheavals and mood swings on Wall Street in recent years.

The issue has been particularly prominent in Nevada's senate race. Democratic Senate leader Harry Reid has attacked Republican opponent Sharron Angle, a favorite of conservative Tea Party groups, for saying Social Security should be phased out for "something privatized."

After taking heavy fire on the issue, Angle released a television ad this week attacking Reid for raiding the Social Security trust fund "for his own pet projects" and saying she would like to save the program.

Democrats have made Social Security a top issue for years, and at times have had success painting Republicans as a threat to the popular program, particularly in the 1980s.

A poll released earlier this week by NBC and the Wall Street Journal found Democrats had an advantage of 4 percentage points over Republicans when voters were asked which party would do the better job on Social Security -- the smallest lead listed in the poll since 1994.

Senior citizens traditionally are the most active voters, and their participation could be crucial in a low turnout mid-term election that does not feature a presidential contest to attract less interested voters.

(Editing by Jerry Norton)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (7)
Trooth wrote:
It took us 75 years to get to a point where there will be less money paid in than paid out. At what point will they admit that the seniors grandchildren will either have to work until two years before their given life expectacy to retire because they have raid the trust fund?

Aug 13, 2010 8:11pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
tom7001 wrote:
Best republicans can do is copy Chiles plan? Sounds real third world country, thats where they are taking us!

Aug 13, 2010 9:09pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Social Security should be a big issue for both Republicans and Democrats and even a bigger issue for the public at large. For the past 25 years, under both Republican and Democratic presidents and Congresses, the government has “borrowed” or “stolen” every dime of the $2.54 in surplus Social Security revenue generated by the 1983 payroll tax hike and used it to fund tax cuts, wars, and other government programs. Contrary to the conventional wisdom, the trust fund does not have reserves to last until 2037. The trust fund is empty today. Comptroller General of the GAO, David Walker, tried to make this perfectly clear in a speech he gave on January 21, 2005. Walker said, “There are no stocks or bonds or real estate in the trust fund. It has nothing of real value to draw down.”

In his column, “Social Security, the trust fund and funny money” that appeared in the Washington Post on Tuesday of this week, Allan Sloan let the cat out of the bag and revealed the dirty secret about the trust fund that has been kept from the public for far too long. I am very grateful that Allan chose to quote me and refer to my book, “THE BIG LIE: How Our Government Hoodwinked the Public, Emptied the S.S. Trust Fund and caused The Great Economic Collapse.” I invite you to visit my website at www.thebiglie.net where you can download excerpts from the book. Allen W. Smith, Ph.D., Professor of Economics, Emeritus, Eastern Illinois University.

Aug 13, 2010 12:24am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.