UPDATE 1-Obama signs $600 million US border security bill

Fri Aug 13, 2010 5:49pm EDT

* Illegal immigration big issue in congressional elections

* US lawmakers wary of comprehensive immigration reform

* 1,500 border patrol agents funded through the bill

* Rare display of bipartisanship passed bill (Adds quotes from McConnell, Gibbs, paragraphs 9, 17-19)

By Matt Spetalnick

WASHINGTON, Aug 13 (Reuters) - President Barack Obama on Friday signed into law a $600 million bill to beef up security on the U.S. border with Mexico, and his aides pressed lawmakers to set aside election-year politics and work toward broader immigration reform.

With illegal immigration seen as a key issue in the November congressional elections, the Obama administration touted the border enforcement plan as laying the groundwork for a revived effort to overhaul the U.S. immigration system.

Congress passed the measure this week and sent it to Obama, who sought the extra funding amid complaints from southwestern U.S. states that the government was failing to seal the border from illegal immigrants and drug traffickers.

But lawmakers have been reluctant to push ahead on the hot-button issue of immigration reform, and no serious progress is likely until after the mid-term elections.

Obama's aides insisted the president remained committed to revamping what he has called a broken immigration system, and challenged Democrats and Republicans to show leadership.

"They will need to address this in a bipartisan way," Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano told reporters at the White House. "It cannot only be done by Democrats. The Republicans need to come to the table."

But mindful of the political climate, administration officials set no timetable for breaking the deadlock.

Obama has called for comprehensive reform that includes not only better border security but a pathway to citizenship for millions of illegal immigrants. Republican critics support a tighter border but say citizenship proposals would amount to an amnesty for lawbreakers.

"If the president takes amnesty off the table and makes a real commitment to border and interior security, he will find strong bipartisan support," Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell said in a statement.

MORE BORDER PATROL AGENTS

The new $600 million will fund some 1,500 new border patrol agents, customs inspectors and other law enforcement officials along the border, as well as two more unmanned aerial "drones" to monitor border activities.

Congress' speedy approval of the measure marked a rare display of bipartisanship.

Democratic Senator Charles Schumer said he hoped the bill's passage would help break the stalemate over broader immigration reform. Obama, in a statement issued on Thursday, said he wanted to continue working toward that goal.

There are believed to be about 11 million illegal immigrants in the United States. But immigrants' rights advocates say Republicans have inflated concerns about illegal immigrants in order to put Democrats on the defensive ahead of the Nov. 2 congressional elections.

With the measure's passage, members of Congress running for re-election will be able to spend the next several weeks boasting that they acted to reinforce the border.

Officials in southwestern states have asked for more help from the federal government to stem the flow of illegal immigrants, weapons and narcotics. Obama already has ordered more National Guard troops to the border for a year.

A federal judge last month blocked key parts of an Arizona law that sought to drive illegal immigrants out of the state, handing a victory to the Obama administration, which argued the measure was unconstitutional.

The White House also rejected calls by some Republicans in Congress to alter the 14th amendment of the U.S. Constitution to eliminate language that gives automatic U.S. citizenship to all people born in the United States. These Republicans oppose automatic citizenship for babies of illegal immigrants born in the United States.

The amendment, ratified in 1868 in the aftermath of the U.S. Civil War, was intended to guarantee that former slaves were automatically given U.S. citizenship.

"Those that have, with steadfast fidelity, talked about not tampering with our Constitution, have now swerved to pick the 14th Amendment as the best place to address comprehensive immigration reform," White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said.

"It's rich in its irony. It's wrong in its approach."

(Additional reporting by Jeff Mason; Editing by Will Dunham)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (8)
Montani42 wrote:
What the Democrats and La Raza representatives mean by “immigration reform” is allowing 11 or 12 million illegal aliens to stay in this country and work towards citizenship so they can vote for Democrats that will in return give them payments for food, housing, healthcare, and schooling. Despite the 15,000,000 Americans out of jobs right now, nearly 8,000,000 illegal aliens are working in this country. Many are working in skilled construction jobs such as carpenter, mason, plumber, roofer, drywall installer, etc. These are all well paying jobs being stolen from American workers. Not too long ago I turned a company in my area in for using illegal aliens as landscaping workers. They were deported. Local Americans now work in those very same jobs. There were 18 jobs returned to Americans. Arrest the employers that use illegal aliens and raid the work places to remove the illegals from our communities. Obama and the Democrats are choosing to defend illegal foreign invaders over American citizens. Remember that when you go to the polls in November.

Aug 13, 2010 6:42pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Why is it alright to “throw money” at police state programs but when it comes to taking care of our own people, we close our purse? This morning while taking my walk, I passed this lady wearing flip-flops and pulling a suit case. We live in a rural area so I asked her if she had far to walk. She started crying. It was so sad. She said that she’d just been through a divorce and had lost everything. She’d been staying with a friend, but it hadn’t worked out (I’m assuming her “friend” wanted her to put out. If you’re a vulnerable woman, sooner or later you’ll have to *#%$ some guy you don’t want to *#%$. That’s just the way it is.). Oh, and she was five months pregnant. Great circumstances. God forbid we give someone like her a roof over her head or a job or some other reliable source of income. After all, we’ve got to spend our resources on important things like wars and border guards and tax cuts.

Aug 13, 2010 8:47pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
joelwisch2 wrote:
That director of ICE that got up and said none of the administration support amnesty, also told us Congress authorized the detention and deportation of 400,000 illegal aliens.

OVER a million a year are entering. No one actually knows how many. But in the Tuscon Sector of the Border Patrol, they have geo sensors hooked to excellent computers and they recorded over 750,000 humans walking past. Of that number, they managed to catch and detain 240,000 of those illegal aliens with the resources they had available. OVER.. over 2/3rds of the illegal aliens that crossed in that sector last years made it into the United States.
============================
If I do not see a really serious effort to honor the oath of office, and enforce the law, I will join the Impeach Obama Web and work very hard to see this issue dealt with. Whatever… whatever comes over that border.. the resources to deal with it have to be in place, or American Citizens are going to get hurt. Not on the border mind you, but inland.

Stop the illegal aliens, or I will vote for impeachment of Obama.

Aug 13, 2010 9:17pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.