Another debt ceiling debacle could sink the economy
Last year's Congressional debt standoff hurt consumer confidence more than the collapse of Lehman Brothers, Betsey Johnson and Justin Wolfers write. This time could be worse. Read more at Counterparties
U.S. judge bans planting of genetically engineered beets
SAN FRANCISCO |
SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - A federal judge on Friday banned the planting of genetically modified sugar beets engineered by Monsanto Co in a ruling that marks a major setback for the biotech giant.
U.S. District Judge Jeffrey White ruled in 2009 that the U.S. Department of Agriculture had approved Monsanto's genetically modified sugar beets without adequate environmental study.
Sugar beets account for over half of the nation's sugar supply. But conventional sugar beet seeds remain widely available and environmentalists filing suit said the judge's decision should not significantly affect sugar production.
White's decision on Friday to impose the ban did not apply to crops already planted or harvested. It stems from a lawsuit brought by environmentalists over Monsanto sugar beets engineered to be resistant to the weed-killer Roundup.
Roundup is also manufactured by Monsanto and was sold to farmers together with the genetically altered sugar beet seeds.
"It's a victory for farmers, for the environment and for the public," said George Kimbrell, a senior staff attorney for the Center for Food Safety, plaintiffs in the case.
Environmentalists have argued that the "Roundup Ready" crops have increased the use of herbicides and herbicide- resistant weeds.
Monsanto has claimed in court papers that revoking the government's approval of its genetically modified seed could cost the company and its customers some $2 billion in 2011 and 2012.
Agriculture Department spokesperson Caleb Weaver said the USDA was reviewing the judge's order "to determine appropriate next steps."
FULL IMPLICATIONS UNKNOWN
A Monsanto representative referred reporters to Duane Grant, an Idaho sugar beet farmer and chairman of the Snake River Sugar cooperative.
"Before planting next spring's 2011 crop, clearly we are going to have to understand all of the implications of the judge's ruling, and what might be open to us," Grant said.
He said that since White's decision did not apply to sugar beets already planted or harvested, "really there is no immediate impact on sugar availability or cost to the consumer."
Sugar beets make up a little over half of the U.S. sugar crop, and 95 percent of sugar beets come from Roundup ready seed, Grant said.
The Center for Food Safety has countered that farmers can easily go back to using conventional sugar beet seeds, which were widely used as recently as two years ago.
Most U.S. sugar beets are planted in March, April and May, he said.
The government has valued the sugar beet crop, which is largely grown in 11 states, the bulk of them in the Midwest, at $1.335 billion for 2007-2008.
In June, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld a separate federal judge's ruling revoking the USDA's approval of Monsanto's genetically modified alfalfa until a full environmental review was completed.
(Writing by Dan Whitcomb; Additional reporting by Steve Gorman in Los Angeles and Tom Doggett in Washington; Editing by Peter Cooney)
- Tweet this
- Link this
- Share this
- Digg this
- Reprints
Would you accept an unwrapped sandwich from a stranger on the street?
That is the GMO story in a nutshell. I could go on and on about good versus bad however it won’t educate you as much as if you see for yourself. I suspect this judge has Googled up some facts. Better yet watch a movie called FOOD Inc.
This specific modification encourages use of another product supplied by the Monsanto company, in this case a product known to have harmful health effects. Speaking as one who’s prenatal development had been disrupted and altered by herbicide exposure, although the beats can take it, humans have not been so luckily modified.
Instead of encouraging their use Monsanto should (and could) have developed techniques to eliminate need for herbicides. The concern here was sales, not health and food yield. This, along with the use of planned dependency modifications are what is wrong with the direction of GMO’s today, not GMO’s as a principle. Don’t confuse the two.
Follow Reuters