PIMCO's Gross calls for massive mortgage refinance

Related Video

WASHINGTON | Tue Aug 17, 2010 4:28pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Influential bond investor Bill Gross dispensed more policy advice than the U.S. Treasury bargained for on Tuesday, calling for a massive program to refinance mortgages at low rates to boost the flagging economy.

Gross, speaking at a Treasury forum on the future of housing finance giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, said a massive refinancing program to slash monthly mortgage payments could boost consumer spending by $50 billion to $60 billion and boost home prices by 5 to 10 percent.

"Policymakers should quickly re-engineer a refinancing opportunity for all mortgagees that are current on payments and are included in GSE-securitized mortgages," said Gross, PIMCO's co-founder and co-chief investment officer.

"The American economy is approaching a cul-de-sac of stimulus, both monetarily and fiscally, which will slow it to a snail's pace incapable of providing sufficient job growth going forward."

Such a program was needed in the next six months, he added.

Gross' suggestion is at odds with the Obama administration's housing rescue strategy, which has been focused on modifying failing mortgages to lower payments for struggling homeowners. A wholesale Fannie/Freddie refinancing program for those making their payments would be a major shift in policy.

After the conference, Gross told reporters he didn't think the administration would take up his proposal and added that he "actually shouldn't have brought it up" because the day's focus was on options for a new housing finance system.

Gross, who oversees more than $1 trillion in assets, also called for a full nationalization of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, consolidating them into a single government agency to provide full guarantees for mortgages.

He said it was unrealistic to assume that the private market could step in and replace GSEs as providers of home mortgage liquidity. "It won't work," he said.

"Without a government guarantee, mortgage rates would be hundreds -- hundreds -- of basis points higher, resulting in a moribund housing market for years," Gross said.

He said PIMCO would not consider investing in a private, or privately insured, mortgage pool unless it was accompanied by 30 percent down payments -- far above the current norm.

(Reporting by David Lawder; Editing by Theodore d'Afflisio and Dan Grebler)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (7)
web2mon wrote:
This is irresponsible. 1) this guy has such an agenda, the money his company would make on this ridiculous plan would be unbelievable. 2)He wants the American taxpayer to take the risk that he would not take, 3)He is a major player in the market who just throws out an untested plan and then says “nevermind”, Rosanne Rosana Dana, (SNL), sorry, had to. Why do we tolerate people such as he and there are more like him, who constantly undermine confidence and stability to chase chaotic markets and put the risk on the backs of innocent and unsavvy citizens?

Aug 17, 2010 5:39pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Does this have anything to do with the rumored ‘August Surprise’?

Aug 17, 2010 7:57pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
joelko wrote:
An idea that will and should work. Helps the reliable middle class that’s been honoring their mortgages and puts money into the economy.
Those on the edge will also be helped with more affordable monthly payments.
Should also be politically sensational, as supports middle class.
Will hurt investors and banks (unlike comment above) since value of mortgage bonds held by banks and PIMCO will decline from higher pre-refunding.

Aug 17, 2010 10:02pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.