Private spaceship carrier plane damaged in test

Fri Aug 20, 2010 12:51pm EDT

* Landing gear reportedly collapsed on runway

* Manufacturer Scaled Composites calls accident 'minor'

* Spaceship was not attached to plane during accident

By Irene Klotz

CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla., Aug 20 (Reuters) - An aircraft designed to launch Virgin Galactic's suborbital passenger spaceship was damaged in an accident on a California runway, manufacturer Scaled Composites said.

In a statement on its website, Scaled, a wholly owned subsidiary of Northrop Grumman (NOC.N), called Thursday's incident "minor" and noted that SpaceShipTwo was not attached to the carrier aircraft, known as WhiteKnightTwo, at the time.

Aviation Week & Space Technology, an industry trade publication, is reporting that WhiteKnightTwo's left main landing gear collapsed on the runway. It was not known if the plane was taking off or landing at the time.

Scaled said no one was injured in the accident at a Mojave, California, airport. The Federal Aviation Administration is investigating.

WhiteKnightTwo began flying in 2008 and was making its 37th test flight on Thursday. The aircraft is designed to carry SpaceShipTwo to an altitude of about 45,000 feet (13,650 metres).

The six-passenger, two-pilot spaceship would then be released so it can fire its rocket engine to punch through Earth's atmosphere, experience a few minutes of weightlessness in suborbital space and then land on a runway.

Virgin Galactic, which is selling tickets to ride SpaceShipTwo for $200,000 a seat, has signed up about 340 customers so far. The company is an offshoot of Richard Branson's London-based Virgin Group and hopes to begin commercial space operations in late 2011 or 2012.

SpaceShipTwo is based on a prototype known as SpaceShipOne, which made a trio of suborbital piloted spaceflights in 2004 to clinch a $10 million contest for private human spaceflight.

Scaled did not say how the damage to WhiteKnightTwo will affect the testing program for SpaceShipTwo and pilot training.

(Editing by Jane Sutton and Eric Beech)

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (14)
SockRayBlue wrote:
If I had a quarter of a million dollars going into space would be the farthest thing on my mind. Too many other things to do for a lot less.

Aug 20, 2010 8:31pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
sailordude wrote:
I think the reasons why Obama supported a privatization of the space program, other then that’s what his advisers told him to do; is that it gives him cover with the radical cuts he has asked for, and hey if it fails, it makes big government look good anyway.

Failure IS AN OPTION WITH DEMOCRATS,

IN FACT, THEY THRIVE ON FAILURE!

Aug 20, 2010 12:39am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Hawkseyez wrote:
going into space is the stuff dreams are made of. reaching for the unobtainable and catching it is magical. 1/4 million is not alot for many folks. problem is without government intervention,regulation and even protection space might end up being another area we humans fight each other over disgustingly.

Aug 21, 2010 2:22am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.