Iran shows missile, says is friend to neighbors

TEHRAN Wed Aug 25, 2010 2:45pm EDT

EDITORS' NOTE: Reuters and other foreign media are subject to Iranian restrictions on leaving the office to report, film or take pictures in Tehran. An undated handout picture released by Iran's defence ministry on August 25, 2010 shows a third generation of Fateh 110 (Conqueror) surface-to-surface missile being launched during a test from an unknown location in Iran. REUTERS/Vahidreza Alaii/Handout

EDITORS' NOTE: Reuters and other foreign media are subject to Iranian restrictions on leaving the office to report, film or take pictures in Tehran. An undated handout picture released by Iran's defence ministry on August 25, 2010 shows a third generation of Fateh 110 (Conqueror) surface-to-surface missile being launched during a test from an unknown location in Iran.

Credit: Reuters/Vahidreza Alaii/Handout

Related Topics

TEHRAN (Reuters) - Iran showed off an improved domestically made missile on Wednesday, the latest in a string of announcements about new military hardware it hopes will dissuade enemies from attacking.

The United States and Israel both say they do not rule out bombing Iran to prevent it getting nuclear weapons. Tehran, which started fuelling its first nuclear power station on Saturday, says its atomic programme is peaceful.

State television showed a test-firing of the nine-meter-long (30-ft) missile it said was a new version of the Fateh-110 weapon with an improved range of 250 km and better precision than previous models.

In recent days Iran has also publicized new mini-submarines, armed speed boats and a prototype long-range bomber drone. Defense Minister Ahmad Vahidi said neighboring countries had nothing to fear from Tehran's improved defenses.

He criticized Washington's decision this month to sell the latest Patriot interceptor missiles to Kuwait to counter a potential Iranian threat. Just across the Gulf, Kuwait could be in range of the upgraded Fateh-110.

"America is seeking to create a climate of fear about Iran by installing new (weapons) systems in the region, but there is no necessity for these systems," Vahidi said.

Many of Iran's Gulf Arab neighbors are concerned about the Shi'ite state's increasing clout in the region and the prospect that it might acquire nuclear weapons.

Kuwait has expressed safety concerns about Iran's Bushehr power plant which most analysts say does not increase Iran's chances of getting a nuclear weapon.

Vahidi reiterated Iran's offer of support to the Lebanese military, initially suggested after a deadly cross-border clash with Israel.

"Lebanon and the Lebanese army is our friend and if there were to be a request we are ready to help them," Vahidi was quoted as saying by the students news agency ISNA.

The offer from Iran, which supports Lebanon's militant Shi'ite group Hezbollah, could fuel Western fears that Tehran is increasing its influence near Israel's northern border.

Concern about Iran's nuclear programme center on its uranium enrichment programme and its missile capabilities.

Iran has long-range missiles including the Shahab 3 and the Sejil which could be used to hit Israel and regional U.S. bases.

Tehran is still awaiting the delayed delivery of Russian S-300 air Defense missile systems. The United States and Israel oppose Iran getting the systems as they could help it withstand any future air strikes against its nuclear sites.

(Reporting by Robin Pomeroy; Editing by Angus MacSwan)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (18)
caserojj wrote:
I hate the Iranian government, military and security service. They are oppressive, brutal and totalitarian. I would love nothing better that to nuke their facilities but then I temper those desires with the realization of how many thousands of innocent civilians will die in those attacks. No I don’t think it is worth the price. I despised Saddam Hussein and his regime but I am not sure deposing him was worth the terrible price the Iraqi’s paid later. It is always the civilian population that pays the price because they are the most vulnerable.

Aug 25, 2010 9:18am EDT  --  Report as abuse
wolf91101 wrote:
This man is going to take us to world war

Aug 25, 2010 10:35am EDT  --  Report as abuse
tipu420 wrote:
If anything US and Israel would take us to World War. With the unprecendented Wars that US has started having in the last decade, global peace and security is at its all time LOW. Thanks to the United States for that.

Innocent civilians are dying in all parts of the World due to the poor military invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan and even today far more than 3000 (that dies in WTC) civilians have died in other parts of the World in suicide bombs which were all not as frequent prior to US invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan.

The rapes, torture & murders of innocent victims by US military personnel is to be blamed for all this havoc.

Aug 25, 2010 11:51am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.