Ireland stung by S&P downgrade

DUBLIN | Wed Aug 25, 2010 3:28am EDT

DUBLIN (Reuters) - Ireland's financial headache worsened on Wednesday after Standard & Poor's cut its credit rating in a move criticized by the country's debt management agency.

In a strongly worded statement, the National Treasury Management Agency said it disagreed with S&P's view that Ireland faced substantially higher costs to bail out its ailing banking sector.

"In terms of the specific analysis by S&P, this is largely predicated upon an extreme estimate of bank recapitalization costs of up to 50 billion euros," the NTMA said.

"We believe this approach is flawed."

Concerns over the final bill for purging Irish banks of bad debts clocked up in a decade-long property binge have pushed Ireland back to the center of the European debt crisis and it is viewed as the second riskiest euro zone country after Greece.

The premium investors demand to hold Ireland's 10-year bonds over German bunds has been steadily widening in the past few weeks and remained elevated at 327 basis points on Wednesday.

The spread finished at 330 bps on Tuesday, its highest level since the Greek financial crisis broke in May.

Brenda Kelly, an analyst at CMC Markets, said she expected Irish borrowing costs to climb on the back of S&P's move.

"I think we are going to have to an awful lot more in interest payments," she said.

Although Ireland has raised virtually all of the 20 billion euros of long-term debt targeted for 2010, S&P's move may make it more difficult for the country's banks to extend the maturity of their funding later this year and eventually wean themselves off a state guarantee on their debt.

The NTMA will auction treasury bills worth between 400 million and 600 million euros on Thursday as part of a regular sale of short-term paper.

S&P cut Ireland's long-term rating by one notch to 'AA-', the fourth highest investment grade, and assigned the country a negative outlook late on Tuesday saying the cost to the government of supporting the financial sector had increased significantly.

Rating agencies have been steadily hacking away at Ireland's credit rating and S&P's is now on a par with Fitch and one notch below Moody's, which cut its rating to Aa2 last month.

S&P said it expects Ireland will need to spend 90 billion euros to support its banking system, up from its prior estimate of 80 billion euros including capital used to improve the solvency of financial institutions and losses taken from loans the government acquired from banks.

Ireland's budget deficit ballooned to 14 percent of gross domestic product, the highest in Europe, last year due to the cost of propping up nationalized lender Anglo Irish ANGIB.UL and it could climb higher if Dublin injects an additional 10.05 billion euros into the bank.

Ireland's central bank governor said last week that the final bill for Anglo could be between 22-25 billion euros, though the cost of bailing out the lender would not increase debt to an unmanageable level.

(Editing by John Stonestreet)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
alderman wrote:
Rating agencies hould be banned from commenting on states’s credit worthiness. This has been used as an offensive economic weapon many times in the past and it should be stopped. This is an obvious area of UN competence and I am surprised none has raised it as an issue there.

Aug 25, 2010 5:34am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Hewson wrote:
S&P’s calculations are deeply flawed. No allowance for the €500,000,000 the State got for its capital injection into Bank of Ireland, no allowance made for the €1 billion in preference shares it holds in the bank, no allowance made for the value of assets held by the National Assets Management Agency and bought from the banks at a large discount. 25% of these assets relate to property in London. Is S&P suggesting that these assets are worthless? It seems so, because none of them are taken into account when they do their sums.

Besides all of which, aren’t these the same bunch of clowns who had their eyes closed when the US sub-prime bomb was on the verge of exploding a couple of years ago?

Some ratings agency!

Aug 25, 2010 6:04am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.