The dome of the Capitol is reflected in a puddle in Washington February 17, 2012.REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

Another debt ceiling debacle could sink the economy

Last year's Congressional debt standoff hurt consumer confidence more than the collapse of Lehman Brothers, Betsey Johnson and Justin Wolfers write. This time could be worse.  Read more at Counterparties  

Paul Allen's firm sues Silicon Valley giants

Related Topics

Businessman Paul Allen arrives for Time magazine's 100 most influential people gala in New York, May 8, 2008. REUTERS/Lucas Jackson

Businessman Paul Allen arrives for Time magazine's 100 most influential people gala in New York, May 8, 2008.

Credit: Reuters/Lucas Jackson

SAN FRANCISCO | Fri Aug 27, 2010 7:28pm EDT

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - A company linked to Microsoft Corp co-founder Paul Allen is suing 11 major corporations, including Apple, Google and Facebook, accusing them of infringing on technology patents.

Interval Licensing is asserting four patents against a cluster of defendants, including also AOL, eBay, Facebook, Netflix, Office Depot, OfficeMax, Staples, Yahoo and Google's YouTube, according to the suit.

Google, Facebook and eBay said they will fight the accusations by Interval, which owns a portfolio of technology patents but does not manufacture. Apple, AOL, Office Depot, Netflix and OfficeMax declined to comment. The remaining companies did not respond to requests for comment.

Experts say companies that lack production but utilize old patents to make broad infringement claims tend to raise red flags. But the lawsuit points out Allen's deep history with Google, including early funding of founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page, a likely attempt to distinguish this lawsuit from other opportunistic patent litigation, Stanford professor and IP litigator Mark Lemley said.

"It's usually an indication either that the patents are invalid, or they're overclaiming them," said Lemley, whose law firm represents Google and Netflix in unrelated matters.

"Part of what's going on here is the plaintiffs are going out of their way to say, 'Hey, look, we're really important people. We're real innovators."

Allen, the 37th-richest person in the world according to Forbes, co-founded Interval Research in 1992 to develop communications and computer technology. The company, which employed more than 110 scientists and engineers at one point, filed patents over several years covering Internet search and display innovations, according to the lawsuit.

Interval Licensing now owns those patents.

RED FLAGS

Allen, who has been treated for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, in July pledged most of his estimated $13.5 billion fortune to philanthropy after his death. He co-founded Microsoft in 1975 with Bill Gates but resigned as an executive in 1983 as he overcame a first bout with cancer.

In the suit filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington, Interval is seeking damages and a halt to the alleged violations of patents it said were fundamental to e-commerce and search.

"This lawsuit against some of America's most innovative companies reflects an unfortunate trend of people trying to compete in the courtroom instead of the marketplace," a Google spokesman said in an emailed statement.

"Innovation -- not litigation -- is the way to bring to market the kinds of products and services that benefit millions of people around the world."

Interval spokesman David Postman said the lawsuit was necessary to protect its investment in innovation.

"We are not asserting patents that other companies have filed, nor are we buying patents originally assigned to someone else," Postman said. "These are patents developed by and for Interval."

Facebook spokesman Andrew Noyes said: "We believe this suit is completely without merit and we will fight it vigorously."

(Reporting by Dan Levine, Alexandria Sage, Alex Dobuzinskis and Lisa Baertlein; Editing by Gary Hill and Matthew Lewis; editing by Eric Walsh)

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (14)
Stupidscript wrote:
Woohoo!! Bring it on! Maybe, at long last, all of the big players who have used patent lawsuits to harm, cripple or destroy their competition will open their eyes to the absurdity of granting patents to software processes. Keep in mind that most of the companies mentioned in the article have, at one time or another, some more often than others, used the patent system to bring much smaller competitors to court, frequently killing the companies as they could not hope to expend the funds required to prove the patents unenforceable. My hope is that this starts a serious discussion about whether patents should be used to protect intellectual property, or whether the copyright system is better suited, and a more fair application of the concept of protecting one’s work in the digital world.

Go Interval!!

Aug 27, 2010 3:58pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Walt67 wrote:
Apple: Highest retail product price, lowest 3rd World wages…
– a cool site; Balkingpoints ; incredible satellite view of earth

Aug 27, 2010 4:28pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
nicfulton wrote:
Good to hear. If a company that did fundamental research wins in court – which it should if the patents are novel – then this is good for research rather than me-too marketing driving companies that would rather merely copy the research of others rather than invest in innovation themselves.

Aug 27, 2010 6:39pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.