Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Flooding in India

Heavy monsoon rains have swollen several rivers.  Slideshow 

Photo

Celebrity portraits

Up close and personal with famous faces.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Ground Zero Muslim center may get public financing

Related Topics

A demonstrator who supports the proposed Muslim cultural center and mosque Park51 stands with a sign in front of the site in New York August 25, 2010. REUTERS/Lucas Jackson

A demonstrator who supports the proposed Muslim cultural center and mosque Park51 stands with a sign in front of the site in New York August 25, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Lucas Jackson

NEW YORK | Fri Aug 27, 2010 3:58pm EDT

NEW YORK (Reuters) - The Muslim center planned near the site of the World Trade Center attack could qualify for tax-free financing, a spokesman for City Comptroller John Liu said on Friday, and Liu is willing to consider approving the public subsidy.

The Democratic comptroller's spokesman, Scott Sieber, said Liu supported the project. The center has sparked an intense debate over U.S. religious freedoms and the sanctity of the Trade Center site, where nearly 3,000 perished in the September 11, 2001 attack.

"If it turns out to be financially feasible and if they can demonstrate an ability to pay off the bonds and comply with the laws concerning tax-exempt financing, we'd certainly consider it," Sieber told Reuters.

Spokesmen for Mayor Michael Bloomberg, Governor David Paterson and the Islamic center and were not immediately available.

The proposed center, two blocks from the Trade Center site in lower Manhattan, has caused a split between people who lost relatives and friends in the attack, as well as conservative politicians, and those who support the project. Among those who support it are the mayor, civic and religious groups, and some families of victims.

The mosque's backers hope to raise a total of $70 million in tax-exempt debt to build the center, according to the New York Times. Tax laws allow such funding for religiously affiliated non-profits if they can prove the facility will benefit the general public and their religious activities are funded separately.

The bonds could be issued through a local development corporation created for this purpose, experts said.

The Islamic center would have to repay the bonds, which likely would be less expensive than taxable debt.

New York City's Industrial Development Authority could not issue debt for the center because the state civic facilities law, which governed this type of financing for non-profits, was allowed to expire about two years ago.

(Reporting by Joan Gralla; Editing by Dan Grebler)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (190)
TLA wrote:
Who cares N.Y. City should have a fence around it and be a penal colony anyway along with Chicago.

Aug 27, 2010 4:13pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
anonym0us wrote:
Adding insult to injury.
If you don’t like to pay for this abomination, the Ground Zero mosque, go and vote in November. We the People can and must vote out all supporters of the project, regardless of their party affiliation (hint: Ron Paul, the darling of Libertarians and GOP congressman, is one). And don’t forget the most prominent supporter, BHO. His turn to get kicked outta the office will come in 2012.

Aug 27, 2010 4:14pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
kentmt wrote:
After we fence NYC, we should fence ALL sanctuary cities. Then meet illegals at the border and give them their choice of which they prefer to be bused to.

Aug 27, 2010 4:24pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.