U.S. Army Captain Michael Kelvington, commander of the Battle company, 1-508 Parachute Infantry battalion, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, bows next to remains of Gulam Dostager, a member of Afghan Local Police who was killed in the blast of an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) during the joint Tor Janda (Black Flag in Pashtu) operation, in Zahri district of Kandahar province, southern Afghanistan May 25, 2012.  REUTERS/Shamil Zhumatov  (AFGHANISTAN - Tags: MILITARY CIVIL UNREST CONFLICT TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Members of the U.S. Navy Blue Angels fly over the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan as part of the 25th annual Fleet Week celebration in New York, May 23, 2012.  REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz (UNITED STATES - Tags: MILITARY ANNIVERSARY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Fleet Week

The U.S. Navy takes Manhattan for a week.  Slideshow 

Photo

The SpaceX mission

A privately owned unmanned rocket blasts off on a mission to be the first commercial flight to the International Space Station.  Slideshow 

U.S. general critical of UK early tactics in Helmand

Related Topics

LONDON | Sun Aug 29, 2010 10:39pm EDT

LONDON (Reuters) - A former top U.S. general in Afghanistan Monday criticized Britain's military tactics in Helmand province in the south, saying commanders during 2006 did not pressure the Taliban sufficiently.

In an interview with Britain's Times newspaper, Lieutenant General Benjamin Freakley said British troops deployed as if they were facing guerillas in Northern Ireland.

In 2006 most of Britain's 9,500 troops were in Helmand province, the scene of some of the fiercest fighting with the Taliban.

Freakley, the most senior U.S. operational commander in southern and eastern Afghanistan in 2006 until early 2007, said the British tactic of sending small groups of soldiers to defend district centers in Helmand, such as Musa Qala and Sangin, had "proved disastrous."

"They thought of a platoon house as in Northern Ireland but in Afghanistan you have to be mobile against the Taliban," Freakley told the Times.

"You can't be in a fixed position because the Taliban will hit you."

Freakley said Britain also failed to implement reconstruction programs that would keep the insurgents on the back foot.

"I was trying to get them (British commanders) to keep constant pressure on the adversary and to make sure that reconstruction efforts and spreading the governance of the Afghan Government went on simultaneously," he said.

"Without simultaneous action you're just poking your finger at the problem."

Ousted by a U.S.-led invasion in 2001, the Taliban have made a comeback in recent years despite the growing number of foreign troops, now standing at some 150,000.

President Barack Obama, who has boosted U.S. troop levels in Afghanistan, plans a strategy review in December after the mid-term elections. He has also said he intended to start pulling out U.S. troops from Afghanistan in July 2011 as long as the right conditions existed.

Army General David Petraeus, commander of U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan, said earlier this month he saw areas of progress.

British Prime Minister David Cameron last month he might start withdrawing troops as early as next year, in line with an international aspiration to give Afghans full control of their security by the end of 2014.

(Reporting by Karolina Tagaris; editing by Matthew Jones)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
regdwight wrote:
HE JUST NOTICED?!?! WHAT A MORON.

Aug 30, 2010 7:57am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.