Facebook CEO: Keep private life out of lawsuit

NEW YORK Tue Aug 31, 2010 6:52pm EDT

Facebook Inc Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg speaks during a session at the Cannes Lions 2010 International Advertising Festival in Cannes, in this June 23, 2010 file photo. REUTERS/Sebastien Nogier

Facebook Inc Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg speaks during a session at the Cannes Lions 2010 International Advertising Festival in Cannes, in this June 23, 2010 file photo.

Credit: Reuters/Sebastien Nogier

Related Topics

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Facebook Inc Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg says a lawsuit by a man who claims to own a huge chunk of the popular social networking website is seeking to uncover unnecessary details about his private life to harass him.

Zuckerberg is fighting a civil lawsuit filed by Paul Ceglia, an upstate New York resident who claims an 84 percent stake in the privately held company, believed to be worth several billion dollars.

Ceglia, an owner of a wood pellet fuel company who lives in Wellsville, New York, is trying to return the case to a New York state court, after Zuckerberg moved it to federal court.

"They filed this remand motion to harass defendants under the pretext of obtaining jurisdictional discovery into Zuckerberg's private life," lawyers for Zuckerberg said in a Monday filing in the federal court in Buffalo, New York.

Ceglia alleged in a June 30 lawsuit that a 2003 contract with Zuckerberg entitles him to control of Facebook. Forbes magazine in March estimated Zuckerberg was worth $4 billion.

Federal courts can hear cases from parties in different states. Zuckerberg, 26, considers himself a California citizen, while Ceglia said both men are New Yorkers.

"The higher the stakes, the more likely you want to take advantage of procedural moves to improve your chances of winning, or settling on the most favorable terms," said Adam Steinman, a professor at Seton Hall University School of Law in Newark, New Jersey.

Steinman said "conventional wisdom" is often that defendants prefer federal court to state court, because cases might be dismissed faster or less likely to reach juries. "There could also be a 'home-field' advantage if a state judge were more sympathetic to a local plaintiff," he said.

It is unclear what details Ceglia hopes to uncover, or Zuckerberg wants to keep from being revealed.

Social networking companies such as Facebook have long faced concerns over privacy. They must balance users' concerns about how much personal information is made public with a need to generate revenue by sharing details with advertisers.

In May, Facebook introduced tools to give users more control over what information is shared.

Zuckerberg, a Dobbs Ferry, New York native, launched Facebook in February 2004 as a Harvard University sophomore. He dropped out after that year and moved to California.

Now based in Palo Alto, California, Facebook said it has more than 500 million users and 1,600 employees.

Terry Connors, a partner at Connors & Vilardo LLP in Buffalo who represents Ceglia, said he expects to respond to Zuckerberg's allegations in a court filing within two weeks.

Facebook, in an emailed statement, said "Ceglia's claim that Mark Zuckerberg lives in New York is another ridiculous and demonstrably false claim in an already absurd lawsuit."

In June, Zuckerberg said he had no date to take Facebook public. The next month, he told ABC News he was "quite sure" there was no contract ceding Facebook ownership rights.

A hearing on Ceglia's lawsuit is set for October 13.

The case is Ceglia v. Zuckerberg et al, U.S. District Court, Western District of New York, No. 10-00569.

(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Derek Caney)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (11)
tangogo68 wrote:
I thought Zuckerberg had said that privacy was an outdated concept, and that his company was going to re-define ‘old’ social norms of such a quaint notion as keeping personal information personal — maybe he should have set his life to the hidden opt-in category rather than the default settings.

Aug 31, 2010 9:57pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
ALASKA2010 wrote:
I totally agree with tangogo68. You are spot on. And I am going to absolutely love seeing Zuckerberg’s private details being aired and watching him lose his privacy. Zuckerberg has ruined some people’s lives and they are not just a few lives. Have you heard of karma, Zucky? I am loving this! Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!

Aug 31, 2010 10:21pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
ZPT wrote:
Alaska and Tango, think for a second before you spout bile. Zuckerberg created a system in which people can volentarily share otherwise private information, a system that people CHOOSE to join. If you don’t like facebook, don’t get one!

Zuckerberg, on the other hand, didn’t CHOOSE to have someone file a frivillous lawsuit against him.

Sep 01, 2010 10:01am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.