Obama administration appeals stem cell injunction

Related Topics

A human embryonic stem cell line derived at Stanford University is seen in this handout photo released to Reuters by the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine, March 9, 2009. REUTERS/Julie Baker/Stanford University School of Medicine/California Institute for Regenerative Medicine/Handout

A human embryonic stem cell line derived at Stanford University is seen in this handout photo released to Reuters by the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine, March 9, 2009.

Credit: Reuters/Julie Baker/Stanford University School of Medicine/California Institute for Regenerative Medicine/Handout

WASHINGTON | Tue Aug 31, 2010 6:21pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Obama administration asked a federal judge on Tuesday to lift an injunction halting human embryonic stem cell research, saying it would irreparably harm research and cost more than 1,300 jobs.

The Justice Department also appealed against the injunction by Judge Royce Lamberth in which he ruled National Institutes of Health funding of human embryonic stem cell research violated a law called the Dickey-Wicker Amendment, which bars federal funding of work that involves destroying embryos.

The administration said Lamberth's ruling was overly broad and was having a significant negative impact on embryonic stem cell research, arguing that there was "serious doubt" Congress intended the legislation to be so encompassing.

"Numerous ongoing projects will likely not survive even a temporary gap in funds, jeopardizing both the potential benefit of the research and the hundreds of millions of dollars of taxpayer funds already invested in it," the filing said.

The Justice Department asked Lamberth to rule by September 7 on the request to lift his injunction.

Lamberth's injunction was a setback for President Barack Obama and the issue could become a theme in November elections where his fellow Democrats who control both chambers of Congress are facing tough races.

One of Obama's first acts after taking office in 2009 was to broaden federal funding of human embryonic stem cell research -- a controversial decision because some people oppose any destruction of human embryos, even for medical research.

Dr. James Sherley, a biological engineer at Boston Biomedical Research Institute, and Theresa Deisher of Washington-based AVM Biotechnology sued, saying Obama's policy violated Dickey-Wicker and harmed their own chances of getting funding for similar research not involving embryos.

SELF-INTEREST

Sherley and Deisher's "remote economic self-interests do not outweigh the harm the injunction will cause NIH, the hundreds of affected human embryonic stem cell researchers, and the millions of individuals who hold out hope that human embryonic stem cell research will lead to the cure for, or treatment of, their currently incurable illnesses," the Justice Department said.

The administration pointed to 24 projects up for renewed federal funding between now and the end of September and said the benefits from the research could be lost. If the projects ended, it would waste $64 million already invested, the administration said.

Overall, the injunction could put 1,300 jobs at risk, NIH Director Francis Collins said in a declaration to the court.

Earlier on Tuesday, Democratic Representative Diana DeGette said she would push to revive legislation specifically allowing federal funding of the research by the end of September.

"We need to pass legislation in September to fix this problem," she told Reuters in a telephone interview.

DeGette co-sponsored bipartisan legislation that passed both the House and Senate twice and was twice vetoed by then-President George W. Bush.

DeGette said she believed there was support in the House and Senate, as well as in both parties, to push through legislation quickly.

(Additional reporting by Maggie Fox; Editing by John O'Callaghan)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (8)
How can anyone not be upset by this? Have we lost our nerve? If we have please don’t try getting a new one off the backs of women selling their eggs to research. Have a heart ladies and don’t sell out your unborn eggs to big business and labs that are only serving the unnerving. What if Obama was an embryo to a rat? He wouldn’t like it very much now would he. At least he was given a chance at life and now look how he’s treating the misfortunate. What goes around comes around and I wouldn’t trade places with him for all the tea in china!

Aug 31, 2010 3:53pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
bobz wrote:
I have 3 Daughters and a wife all disabled. My twins were born 2lbs. each. One is blind and the other is mentally challenged. My other Daughter is Autistic. My wife has Crohns Disease. If embtyonic stem cells (our own) are used to treat my wife and daughters to help them live a better life, this to me is g-d like. My children were brought into this world disabled if this therapy can help them level the playing field on not have to depend on the government what is so wrong with that?

Aug 31, 2010 6:03pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
See that liberal agenda just wasting away….bye bye

Aug 31, 2010 9:49pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.