U.S. Army Captain Michael Kelvington, commander of the Battle company, 1-508 Parachute Infantry battalion, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, bows next to remains of Gulam Dostager, a member of Afghan Local Police who was killed in the blast of an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) during the joint Tor Janda (Black Flag in Pashtu) operation, in Zahri district of Kandahar province, southern Afghanistan May 25, 2012.  REUTERS/Shamil Zhumatov  (AFGHANISTAN - Tags: MILITARY CIVIL UNREST CONFLICT TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Members of the U.S. Navy Blue Angels fly over the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan as part of the 25th annual Fleet Week celebration in New York, May 23, 2012.  REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz (UNITED STATES - Tags: MILITARY ANNIVERSARY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Fleet Week

The U.S. Navy takes Manhattan for a week.  Slideshow 

Photo

The SpaceX mission

A privately owned unmanned rocket blasts off on a mission to be the first commercial flight to the International Space Station.  Slideshow 

Obama adviser warns against tax cuts for wealthy

Related Topics

WASHINGTON | Tue Aug 31, 2010 4:10pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Temporarily extending tax cuts for the rich opens the door to permanent tax cuts and that is something the United States cannot afford, an economic advisor to President Barack Obama said on Tuesday.

Jason Furman, deputy assistant to the president for economic policy, said a proposed short-term extension for the rich that some economists have advocated would put the country on a slippery slope it would be tough to pull back from.

"There is a concern that (if) you extend those tax cuts for even a year, and that is a way to get a foot in the door ... and make them permanent," he told an event in Washington on the impact of tax policy on families.

Republicans want to extend the lower rates for all income classes.

Some economists and conservative Democrats point to the economy's lackluster recovery to argue for extending the cuts for the wealthy on a temporary basis, such as one year.

The lower tax rates, enacted in 2001 and 2003, will expire at year-end unless Congress acts to extend them.

Obama and fellow Democrats support renewing the lower rates for the bulk of Americans, about 97 percent, but letting them rise for individuals making above $200,000 and couples making more than $250,000.

The Obama administration has forcefully argued in recent weeks that the country can simply not afford the $700 billion 10-year price tag for extending the historically low rates of the richer classes.

"There are compelling arguments that Democrats may want to consider it, but the White House is too far down the path of making the case that it would be irresponsible" to change its stance now, said Sean West, an analyst at the risk consulting firm Eurasia Group.

The Senate is expected to take up the issue when it reconvenes next month. Many don't expect action before November congressional elections, where the issue is sure to be on voters' minds.

"There is no clear sign that either side has won the argument yet," West said.

Two recent polls put the issue in Obama's favor. Surveys by CNN and CBS found majorities favoring the Democratic stance, while a Reuters/Ipsos poll found voters favoring the Republican position.

A poll this week by the National Association of Business Economics found 54 percent of that group back extending all the lower rates, while about 45 percent favored either letting them all expire or just extending them for the so-called middle class and under groups.

(Editing by Maureen Bavdek and Todd Eastham)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (11)
Denise9997 wrote:
These tax cuts were ridiculous in the first place and were NEVER on the budget. Considering how much everyone wants the economy to improve I can’t believe anyone would be against stopping the cuts. They didn’t exactlly give the economy the boost bush promised us did they? So… if the cuts didn’t help the economy why would stopping them damage the economy?

Aug 31, 2010 1:17pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
jalee wrote:
We would do much better if the dishonest politicians, czars and cabinet people paid their taxes! Penalizing people for saving and investing their monies does not make sense. The elimination of the dividend tax will hurt small stockholders and not big “rich” people!

Aug 31, 2010 1:57pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
bcc243 wrote:
Denise9997: The tax cuts that bush enacted took us out of a recession in less than 6 months. The recession he inheritted after the dot com bubble that clinton passed on to bush. You didn’t think they worked becuase they worked so fast that you don’t even remeber we were in a recession when bush took office. Tax cuts work.

Aug 31, 2010 2:55pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.