Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Rage in Brazil

Mass protests erupt in the biggest cities of Brazil.  Slideshow 

Photo

The Afghan Army

The many faces of the Afghan National Army, which has taken over security of the country from NATO.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Judge rules against U.S. government on oil drilling

One of the remotely operated vehicles (ROV) is seen near the site of the Macondo well in the Gulf of Mexico, in this frame grab captured from a BP live video feed August 30, 2010. REUTERS/BP/Handout

One of the remotely operated vehicles (ROV) is seen near the site of the Macondo well in the Gulf of Mexico, in this frame grab captured from a BP live video feed August 30, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/BP/Handout

HOUSTON | Wed Sep 1, 2010 3:50pm EDT

HOUSTON (Reuters) - A federal judge on Wednesday rejected the U.S. government's request to dismiss an industry lawsuit challenging its deepwater oil and gas drilling moratorium, dealing another blow to the Obama administration.

Hornbeck Offshore Services Inc and other drilling companies sued the administration on June 7 after it first ordered a halt to deepwater drilling in the Gulf of Mexico following BP Plc's well rupture that killed 11 workers and caused the world's worst offshore oil spill.

As a result of Louisiana-based Hornbeck's lawsuit, U.S. District Court Judge Martin Feldman in New Orleans blocked implementation of the drilling ban on June 22.

The Obama administration then issued a reworked second drilling moratorium and asked that the Hornbeck lawsuit be thrown out because the first ban was no longer relevant.

But in his 20-page ruling on Wednesday, Feldman said the administration's new moratorium offered "no substantial changes" from the first one, and denied the motion to dismiss the Hornbeck lawsuit.

The original moratorium, which banned drilling below 500 feet for six months, was put on hold because Feldman found that the administration had failed to properly weigh the economic impact it would have on the industry and the surrounding communities.

Hornbeck and the other companies also had questioned whether the Obama administration, through the Interior Department which oversees and regulates offshore drilling, could rescind the original moratorium, which was blocked by the court, and issue a second one.

Feldman ruled that while the Interior Department could do so, he said the department had failed to follow proper procedures by seeking permission from the court since the original moratorium had been blocked.

A Justice Department spokeswoman said the department was reviewing the decision.

Another drilling company, Ensco Plc, has filed another lawsuit challenging the government's new moratorium, which bans until late November the use of deepwater drilling equipment similar to what was employed on the BP well.

The Obama administration has defended its moratorium plans as necessary to provide the time needed to ensure that exploratory drilling was proceeding safely in light of the BP spill, which began in April.

Deepwater drilling, newer than shallow-water drilling, is also riskier because the drill bit must bore through many more layers of rock and salt under more extreme pressures and temperatures.

The case is Hornbeck Offshore Services LLC et al v Ken Salazar et al, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, No. 10-cv-01663.

(Reporting by Anna Driver in Houston and Jeremy Pelofsky in Washington, editing by Will Dunham)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (7)
Between this and stem cells, Obama is losing a lot of battles lately

Sep 01, 2010 10:49pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
JohnG-73645 wrote:
Obama’s decisions in both cases are correct. The only real losers are the American people. What kind of a stuffed up system is this where piss-willie judges can rule against the government. I say that the only way to save the US from itself is by revoking all state rights and removing state government.

Sep 01, 2010 12:09am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Redone wrote:
JohnG…it’s called checks and balances, and is the foundation of our Constitution. What you are calling for is basically an autocratic dictatorship. Besides, it was a federal judge who made the ruling, not a state superior court judge. Go back to the 4th grade and learn the framework of our government.

Sep 02, 2010 5:59am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.