Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Rage in Brazil

Mass protests erupt in the biggest cities of Brazil.  Slideshow 

Photo

The Afghan Army

The many faces of the Afghan National Army, which has taken over security of the country from NATO.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Apple and TV networks clash over 99 cent rentals

Apple Chief Executive Steve Jobs introduces programming for Apple TV at Apple's music-themed September media event in San Francisco, California September 1, 2010. REUTERS/Robert Galbraith

Apple Chief Executive Steve Jobs introduces programming for Apple TV at Apple's music-themed September media event in San Francisco, California September 1, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Robert Galbraith

NEW YORK | Thu Sep 2, 2010 2:16pm EDT

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Apple Inc introduced a new version of Apple TV on Wednesday with shows from just two networks, underscoring its struggles to win over a media industry worried about losing control over the pricing of its programs.

The new $99 Apple TV will allow users to rent TV shows such as "Glee" and "Modern Family" for 99 cents thanks to partnerships with Walt Disney Co's ABC and News Corp's Fox.

But several other media conglomerates, including General Electric Co's NBC Universal, CBS Corp, Viacom Inc, are notably absent from the roster.

Chief among concerns in the entertainment industry are the terms Apple is seeking for rental deals, according to several media executives familiar with the matter. In its discussions, they said, Apple is asking for deals that would allow it to keep 30 percent of the rental fee.

That revenue-sharing breakdown is similar to agreements Apple has struck for TV show and movie downloads from iTunes. But executives point out that iTunes downloads are priced at $1.99 to $2.99 and say they are hesitant to replicate those deals at prices of 99 cents.

"Steve Jobs' thing is if we lower the price point we'll sell more stuff," said one media executive close to the talks.

Another said: "This is a plan that is designed to sell iPads, iPods and iPhones. It is not a plan that is designed to appropriately value content."

Still, analysts believe other media companies might feel pressured to strike deals if the 99-cent rental proves popular with consumers. What is more, Apple co-founder Steve Jobs has been proved right before in forcing through business models for media companies, in particular with the music business.

As for the media companies, they worry they could find themselves in the same company as the book and music industries struggling to cope with a downward spiral on pricing.

Evercore analyst Alan Gould, in a note, wrote: "Getting the consumer used to a 99 cent price for a TV show (rental or sale) and further empowering Apple as the '800 pound gorilla'... is unwise."

Another industry-watcher, Larry Haverty, a Gabelli funds portfolio manager who owns media stocks, said even the current download deals on iTunes have likely failed to significantly help the bottom line for entertainment companies.

"My guess is that the revenue streams from the existing $1.99 downloads aren't particularly significant," said Haverty.

Viacom, CBS and NBC declined to comment.

When it comes to 99 cent rentals, another major sticking point is that broadcasters and producers worry the rentals will further undermine DVD sales. In the past, they have made millions of dollars licensing entire series and packaging them into DVD sets.

"We don't think of TV as an episodic pay-per-view model which is what 99 cents rental is," one of the media executives said, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of talks with Apple.

(Editing by Paul Thomasch; editing by Andre Grenon)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
RRrrr wrote:
Yeah, why think of TV as episodic or broadcast free-for-view? 99c makes sense (intended). You can’t sell or rent 45min episodes for the same price as major 2 hour movies. As long as you have the movie price point… TV episodes will have to be less. And forcing bundles, like ’seasons’ and albums, down consumers throats isn’t going to sell well. 99c episode rentals are priced well, considering $1.99/$2.99 download ‘ownership’ of video files. There’s a new medium in town, and the protect-our-outdated-business-model fools are going to have to change. The rental scope is global… not just US. And they’ll fail if they try to force advertising down consumers’ throats… the mute button is too popular, fast-forward is a demanded feature.

Sep 02, 2010 2:56am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Does anyone consider Apple to be an innovative company? Anyone born after 1975 with half a brain can get all the music, movies, and TV shows they want. A useful piece of technology is one that can interface with a desktop computer and transfer files fast, store large amounts of data, play media files for long periods of time without draining the battery, and have a nice screen that can handle various resolutions.

The only thing these Apple products seem to be “good” at are emptying the pockets of Apple’s customers. Or rather, their products are excellent at pricing Apple out of the market.

As a user, I require two things of a provider with regards to listening to music and watching videos. First, give me a device. Second, provide me access to content. I have tens, perhaps hundreds of thousands of files. To think that a consumer is going to pay that much (a buck per file) for this content is ridiculous.

Companies need to face reality. They cannot control access to content. They can cry about piracy until the cows come home, or they can take advantage of the power of this technology and adjust their business models. But this would require actual innovation. Apple would need to make a product that I would find useful.

Give me a nice screen, long battery life, lots of storage, quick transfer speed, good compatibility, and access to a database with unlimited downloads that has everything… for a flat monthly fee.

I’m already getting all this stuff. You might as well get some of my money instead of none.

Sep 03, 2010 1:00pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.