EPA to issue more rules in climate fight

Related Topics

WASHINGTON | Thu Sep 2, 2010 6:17pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency will roll out more regulations on greenhouse gases and other pollution to help fight climate change, but they will not be as strong as action by Congress, a senior administration official said.

The agency "has a huge role to play in continuing the work to move from where we are now to lower carbon emissions", said the official, who did not want to be identified as the EPA policies are still being formed.

President Barack Obama, looking to take the lead in global talks on greenhouse gas emissions, has long warned that the EPA would take steps to regulate emissions if Congress failed to pass a climate bill.

The Senate has all but ruled out moving on greenhouse gases this year, even though the House of Representatives passed a bill last year. In late July, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid stripped climate provisions out of an energy bill, saying he could not get one Republican vote for them.

The senior official stopped short of saying the EPA alone would achieve Obama's goal of about 17 percent reductions in greenhouse gases by 2020 from 2005 levels.

"With legislation you almost certainly get more emissions reductions than you get with existing authorities" that the EPA can use under the Clean Air Act, the official said.

And analysts say the EPA will not be able to achieve the far deeper cuts needed to help prevent the worst effects of climate change such as floods, droughts and heatwaves.

Though Congress will not likely move in 2010, the EPA expects it will do so in coming years, the official said.

EPA plans on smokestack emissions face obstacles in Congress and in the courts. Senator Jay Rockefeller, a West Virginia Democrat, and other lawmakers hope to stop the EPA from regulating the emissions for two years.

Energy companies -- from wind and solar power makers to utilities -- are concerned about the regulatory uncertainties, with some analysts saying billions of dollars of investments are stymied by the lack of direction in Washington.

The official said the EPA rules would provide regulatory certainty that could help businesses get loans to build new plants. A two-year delay would only prolong the uncertainty, and hurt the chances of getting financing, the official said.

NEW RULES

The EPA has worked with the Department of Transportation to set new fuel-efficiency standards, as well as the first greenhouse gas emissions rules, on cars and light trucks. More standards for vehicles sold after 2017 are expected to be released later this month.

The EPA also has moved to regulate greenhouse gases from stationary sources such as power plants and factories.

Starting next year the EPA will require large power plants, manufacturers and oil refiners to get permits for releasing greenhouse gas emissions, though details are unclear.

The EPA will also require industrial sources to submit analyses on the so-called "best available technology" they could add to their plants to cut emissions under the existing Clean Air Act.

The official said the EPA will put out guidance this month that would help companies determine which technologies -- perhaps moving to cleaner-burning natural gas and away from coal -- would make the most sense.

In addition, the EPA is working on rules to cut emissions of mercury from coal-burning power plants and cement plants and on toughening rules on coal ash. In combination, the rules could help force inefficient coal plants into early retirement.

That could hit shares in big coal burners such as American Electric Power and Southern Co..

A recent Bernstein Research report said upcoming EPA rules could push 15 percent of current coal-fired power plant capacity into early retirement by 2015.

The EPA will soon roll out more regulations on greenhouse gases and traditional pollutants like mercury emissions that will help cut planet-warming pollution and emissions that more directly hurt human health, the official said.

EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson plans to attend a meeting in Mexico in October aimed at reducing emissions of methane, a greenhouse gas about 20 times more potent than carbon dioxide, the official said.

The meeting will come a month before representatives from rich and developing countries convene for annual U.N. climate talks in Cancun, Mexico.

(Editing by Walter Bagley and Dale Hudson)

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
Get ready for higher energy prices. Obama said he was going to find ways to make green energy affordable. Since he can’t make green energy cheaper, he needs to make the current sources more expensive. This will not help us out of our bad economy and only furthers his agendas. The Global Warming/Climate Change movement is in disarray after all of the misrepresentation and manipulation of data by their panel of scientists as well as the outright lies and other scandals, so Congress has wisely backed off of the issue. Too bad that Obama’s handpicked czars are still loyal to his global One World – One Government/Social Justice views and are working against the will of the people to bring about his wishes.

Sep 02, 2010 4:15pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
welder4 wrote:
Reid got it half right , he could not find enough votes in the democrat side either . I believe there are about 28 votes or less for this stupid bill that will never be law unless they pass it with reconciliation or with bribes and threats and back room deals, of course that is why the democrats are so popular nowadays is because of the thug tactics and back rooms deals , shoot every one knows that is the way to get things done. Yes since the Texas government told them to take a hike they are pulling their horns in a tad . so they pick on gasses emitted from the lower extremities of animals and humans . so watch out they will have a meter installed down there to tax you on your emissions ? Heh!

Sep 02, 2010 4:27pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Cognition wrote:
Once again, the conservative lobby mis-represents the reality of the climate change data. After research into the climate scientists letters and documentation, there was no material misrepresentation found. However, the conservative lobby continues to misrepresent the facts of climate change and what a full majority of scientists around the world, have identified as the major issue facing our collective future. Climate change is real and can’t be ignored anymore… the conservative right only puts up roadblocks to protect their power and their pocketbooks… they really don’t care about anything else. Too bad that they don’t genuinely try to address reality. By the way, I’m not a Democrat!

Sep 03, 2010 2:32pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.