U.S. Army Captain Michael Kelvington, commander of the Battle company, 1-508 Parachute Infantry battalion, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, bows next to remains of Gulam Dostager, a member of Afghan Local Police who was killed in the blast of an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) during the joint Tor Janda (Black Flag in Pashtu) operation, in Zahri district of Kandahar province, southern Afghanistan May 25, 2012.  REUTERS/Shamil Zhumatov  (AFGHANISTAN - Tags: MILITARY CIVIL UNREST CONFLICT TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Members of the U.S. Navy Blue Angels fly over the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan as part of the 25th annual Fleet Week celebration in New York, May 23, 2012.  REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz (UNITED STATES - Tags: MILITARY ANNIVERSARY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Fleet Week

The U.S. Navy takes Manhattan for a week.  Slideshow 

Photo

The SpaceX mission

A privately owned unmanned rocket blasts off on a mission to be the first commercial flight to the International Space Station.  Slideshow 

U.S. workers see higher health costs, less care

Related Topics

WASHINGTON | Thu Sep 2, 2010 11:13am EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. companies are cutting healthcare costs further amid a continuing sour economy, scaling back benefits and shifting a greater share of the expense to employees.

The findings, published on Thursday, come as the U.S. congressional campaign heats up over the nation's stagnant economic growth and whether recently passed healthcare reforms should be repealed.

Such steps may be keeping the cost of insurance plans down "but it also means employer coverage is less comprehensive," said Drew Altman, president and CEO of the Kaiser Family Foundation, which conducts the annual survey.

"From a consumer perspective, the cost of health insurance just keeps going up faster than wages."

Health insurance in the United States, unlike other industrialized countries, is largely provided by employers. Roughly 157 million people under age 65 receive their care through their workplace.

A survey of more than 3,000 companies earlier this year found 30 percent of employers have reduced the health benefits they offer or increased their workers' share of the cost, while 23 percent said they raised employee premiums.

As a result, employees are paying an average of 14 percent, or about $482, more a year in healthcare costs for a family plan. Workers are seeing higher deductibles that must be met before coverage kicks in and paying a higher share of the overall health plan's costs.

"In 2010, covered workers contributed a greater share of the total premium, a notable change from the steady share workers have paid on average over the last decade," the report said.

At the same time, that premium has been soaring. Since 2000, the average overall cost of health insurance for a family plan has grown by 114 percent to $13,770 in 2010 from $6,438.

Workers' share of such coverage has grown by 147 percent to $3,997 in 2010 from $1,619 in 2000.

Of course, not all companies provide health insurance, and those who have been laid off -- the nation's unemployment rate is now 9.6 percent -- also have to buy their own policy, pay for doctor visits and other care out of pocket, or go without care.

The health law aims to expand access to coverage and help more small businesses offer coverage to their workers, but many of its provisions do not take effect for years.

(Editing by Matthew Lewis)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (15)
GaPeech wrote:
I am 60 and have had an individual policy for 5 years. I have NEVER used it because the deductible is $5,000. Well, because I turned 60 this year (and STILL have no health problems), Blue Cross raised my rate from $400/month to $590/month. Just because I turned 60. Somewhere insurance has to get these costs under control. I hate to think what I would be paying if I were NOT in excellent health.

Sep 02, 2010 11:41am EDT  --  Report as abuse
PMB60 wrote:
This is why we need a public option. Unfortunately the insurance companies have lots of PAC money which allowed them to bribe the politicans. If we had a public option, the insurance companies would no longer have the Americans over a barrel, so to speak. Yes healthcare systems such as Canada has problems. But check out the rest of the world too! A single payer system is working quite well for the rest of the world.

Sep 02, 2010 12:08pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
inverse137 wrote:
…and yet people still say national health care is “bad for the country.”

Brilliant.

Sep 02, 2010 12:09pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.