Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Rage in Brazil

Mass protests erupt in the biggest cities of Brazil.  Slideshow 

Photo

The Afghan Army

The many faces of the Afghan National Army, which has taken over security of the country from NATO.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Justice Department sues Arizona sheriff in immigration probe

Related Topics

Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio talks with the media before an organized crime sweep in Phoenix, Arizona, July 29, 2010.REUTERS/Rick Scuteri

Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio talks with the media before an organized crime sweep in Phoenix, Arizona, July 29, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Rick Scuteri

WASHINGTON/PHOENIX | Thu Sep 2, 2010 4:23pm EDT

WASHINGTON/PHOENIX (Reuters) - The Justice Department on Thursday sued an Arizona sheriff for refusing to cooperate with its investigation into allegations he and his police force discriminate against Hispanics in his program to crack down on illegal immigrants.

Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio has conducted regular arrest sweeps to try to round up illegal immigrants and smugglers in the state that has borne the brunt of people trying to sneak into the United States illegally from Mexico.

Arpaio's crackdown on illegal immigrants has helped thrust the issue to the forefront nationally. The Obama administration is in a legal wrangle with Arizona over a strict new law against illegal immigration that the state passed in April.

The Justice Department had been in negotiations with Arpaio to obtain documents related to the crackdown as well as access to the county's jails, but those talks broke down and the agency filed a lawsuit to compel his cooperation.

"It is unfortunate that the department was forced to resort to litigation to gain access to public documents and facilities," Thomas Perez, assistant attorney general for the Justice Department's civil rights division, said in a statement.

Hispanic activists, civic authorities and civil rights activists have criticized Arpaio's sweeps as tantamount to racial profiling, a charge Arpaio has denied.

The sheriff said in a statement that during a meeting last week between with Justice Department officials his lawyers committed to cooperate, provide access to his staff and his jails.

"They smiled in our faces and then stabbed us in the back with this lawsuit," Arpaio said. "The Obama administration intended to sue us all along, no matter what we did to try to avert it."

Arizona officials have complained that illegal immigrants are contributing to a rise in crime and violence along the porous U.S. border with Mexico where drug traffickers and smugglers regularly cross.

However, preliminary FBI statistics show a drop in violent and property crimes in major cities in Arizona in 2009.

Also, a new report by the Pew Hispanic Center said the number of illegal

immigrants in the United States dropped to 11.1 million in March 2009 from a peak of 12 million in 2007, likely because of the sour economy and increased enforcement.

In July, a federal judge in Arizona blocked the state from enforcing a strict new immigration law that would have required police to determine the immigration status of a person detained or arrested if the officer believed the person was not in the country legally.

The department's civil rights division began its investigation more than two years ago after allegations that the sheriff's office was engaged in discriminatory conduct.

Last March, the Justice Department requested a myriad of documents and advised the sheriff's office that the probe would also include tours of facilities as well as interviews with senior officials, line officers and jail inmates.

The Justice Department said that because the county sheriff's office has received millions of dollars in federal funding, Arpaio and his office are required to cooperate with the federal probe.

The "refusal to cooperate with reasonable requests for information regarding the use of federal funds is a violation of (their) statutory, regulatory, and contractual obligations," the Justice Department said in its lawsuit.

In a letter to the Justice Department last week, Arpaio's lawyer called it "simply unreasonable" for the Justice Department to request any document it wants, to access any facility it seeks and to interview any witness it wants without any limits.

(Editing by Vicki Allen and Doina Chiacu)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (26)
LeavingCali wrote:
Writers…this law is NOT NEW. It’s the exact same law as the federal law, short of deportation.

In fact, the federal law has no reservation against racial profiling, but the AZ law does. So, the Federal law is more “strict” than AZ’s law.

Obama, quit prosecuting Arizona for doing YOUR job and spend that money on finishing the fence.

Sep 02, 2010 1:32pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
davidhdz001 wrote:
You also have to look from a Political stand point it’s election season and am sure that they are making all of this because of that. When elections are over it will be a less discuss issue. Besides the way the economy is am sure many people are going back to their country of origin. Lack of jobs and money are making it hard for anyone to get a job.

Sep 02, 2010 1:32pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Chalupa wrote:
Is this another taxpayer funded harassment? The taxpayers have spent millions on Blago with minimal results. They manufacture a charge then try to catch the victim in another chargeable offense like lying. Scooter Libby, Martha Stewart tactics.

Sep 02, 2010 1:35pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.