Clinton: time ticking for Israel-Palestinian peace

Related Topics

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (L) shakes hands with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas (R) as U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton looks on at the State Department in Washington September 2, 2010. REUTERS/Jim Young

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (L) shakes hands with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas (R) as U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton looks on at the State Department in Washington September 2, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Jim Young

WASHINGTON | Fri Sep 3, 2010 4:47pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on Friday urged Israel and the Palestinians to overcome the final obstacles to peace, saying their new talks may be a last chance to end the conflict.

Clinton, speaking to Israeli and Palestinian television one day after direct peace talks between the two sides were relaunched in Washington, said skepticism and suspicion cannot be allowed to derail the talks as has happened so many times in the past.

"First, I think that time is not on the side of either Israeli or Palestinian aspirations for security, peace and a state," Clinton said.

"It's clear to me that the forces of growth and positive energy are in a conflict with the forces of destruction and negativity. And the United States wants to weigh in on the side of leaders and people who see this as maybe the last chance for a very long time to resolve this."

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas ended Thursday's meeting with an agreement to talk again on September 14-15 and every two weeks thereafter, fast-tracking a peace push that is one of U.S. President Barack Obama's top priorities.

Both sides accept the need for a "two-state solution" to establish an independent Palestinian state existing peacefully beside Israel.

But political analysts say there are numerous obstacles to a final deal, the first of which comes on September 26 when Israel's partial freeze on building new Jewish settlements in occupied areas of the West Bank comes to an end.

Abbas has said he cannot continue with peace talks if settlement construction resumes but Netanyahu, whose coalition is dominated by pro-settler parties, appears reluctant to extend the moratorium.

Clinton has in the past described the rising risks both sides face, saying "the dynamics of demography, ideology and technology" threaten to produce more extremist groups with better weapons dedicating to a violent solution to the conflict.

She said it was important both sides now take concrete steps to improve conditions on the ground, particularly in areas where Palestinians and Israelis come into direct contact.

"So the checkpoints, the roadblocks, all of the daily challenges that we know affect the Palestinians, are certainly on the agenda," Clinton said.

"I think the political negotiations need to be matched with changes on the ground, and confidence-building and interactions between Israelis and Palestinians."

Clinton acknowledged the challenges ahead for both Abbas and Netanyahu, but said both leaders realized the imperative for their peoples to find a solution.

"These two men, perhaps for different reasons, may be the two who can actually do this," she said.

(Editing by David Alexander and Jerry Norton)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (6)
wrote:
This is getting tricky by the second. As for Netenyahu he maybe thinking now he didn’t joined hands with the extreme right wing ultra orthodox people to make the government. As for Mahmood Abbas the former PLO commander now gets the ultimate test.. Invade Gaza or drown infront of the world with his promises in the violent right wingers in his own side. Looks like the right wing is the problem on both sides. Looks like right wingers are a problem everywhere. As for the right wingers they more worried about which God to praise than obey what God really told us to do. Why don’t these right wingers just let others decide what they should believe than shoving down their throat what they should believe and where they should live.
Now to come back to the subject here.. Yes both sides if they need peace should sideline the extreme right wingers it is still possible with painful concessions from both sides. Hope it happens sooner than later as people on both sides are suffering.

Sep 03, 2010 5:35pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
JackMack wrote:
The solution to the Israel-Palestine conflict is simple. It is by no means easy, but it is breathtakingly simple:
1. Israel surrenders, completely and utterly, ending all hostilities, ceding all currently occupied territories to a legitimate Palestinian Authority. Israel withdraws all settlements from the West Bank and cedes East Jerusalem to the Palestinian State for its Capitol. Israel provides water, agricultural, and industrial aid to the Palestinian state for a period of 25 years.
2. Palestine disarms completely, totally, utterly. Apart from police forces, not a single Palestinian may be armed, ever. Israel retains the right to inspect Palestinian police forces’ weapons caches.
3. If Palestinian forces, or foreign forces acting “on behalf” of Palestine attack Israel, Israel is to respond with a campaign of genocide. Not a single Palestinian dwelling will be left standing, period, nor will any Palestinian be left alive.
4. If Israel fails to sign or honor the agreement, all support from the United States will be immediately withdrawn.

Done.

Sep 03, 2010 6:53pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Banned wrote:
Like husband, so go the wife! Round and round we go. Please surprise us …really, make peace. Like the ‘great’ Rodney King said after his classic run-in with the notorious LAPD, “why can’t we all get along”. Cheers mates!

Sep 03, 2010 9:53pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.