U.S. Army Captain Michael Kelvington, commander of the Battle company, 1-508 Parachute Infantry battalion, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, bows next to remains of Gulam Dostager, a member of Afghan Local Police who was killed in the blast of an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) during the joint Tor Janda (Black Flag in Pashtu) operation, in Zahri district of Kandahar province, southern Afghanistan May 25, 2012.  REUTERS/Shamil Zhumatov  (AFGHANISTAN - Tags: MILITARY CIVIL UNREST CONFLICT TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Members of the U.S. Navy Blue Angels fly over the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan as part of the 25th annual Fleet Week celebration in New York, May 23, 2012.  REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz (UNITED STATES - Tags: MILITARY ANNIVERSARY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Fleet Week

The U.S. Navy takes Manhattan for a week.  Slideshow 

Photo

The SpaceX mission

A privately owned unmanned rocket blasts off on a mission to be the first commercial flight to the International Space Station.  Slideshow 

Factbox: Obama proposes $50 billion for road, rail, airways

MILWAUKEE | Tue Sep 7, 2010 10:34pm EDT

MILWAUKEE (Reuters) - President Barack Obama would spend $50 billion on revamping highways, rails and airport runways to create jobs in the near term and improve the long-term U.S. transportation network.

The $50 billion would be spent in the first year and be part of a six-year transportation bill that must be passed by Congress, an administration official said.

An infrastructure bank would be created under the plan to leverage federal funds with state, local and private funding for important projects.

Following is a summary of the proposal, its likely impact and possible ways to offset its cost.

WHERE THE MONEY WOULD BE SPENT

The White House said it would:

-- Rebuild 150,000 miles of roads and bridges while expanding capacity on some of them.

-- Construct and maintain 4,000 miles of rail lines, both high-speed rail and commuter lines. The plan also would "invest in a long-overdue overhaul of the Amtrak passenger fleet."

-- Rehabilitate or reconstruct 150 miles of airport runways and put in place a NextGen air-traffic control system. Among improvements would be use of a satellite-based surveillance system, which would be more accurate than ground-based radar.

LIKELY IMPACT ON JOBS

The plan would lead to "a substantial number of jobs" beginning in 2011, says the White House. The unemployment rate among construction workers is 17 percent, compared with the U.S. average of 9.6 percent.

Transportation experts say $1 billion in transportation construction spending creates 35,000 jobs.

HOW TO PAY FOR THE PROJECTS

The White House says it will work with Congress to fully pay for the plan. A senior administration official suggested ending "oil and gas loopholes" that have been targeted for elimination by Obama for two years running.

The tax breaks, estimated to be worth $36.5 billion over 10 years, include a manufacturing tax deduction and a percentage depletion on oil and natural gas wells. The petroleum industry wants to keep the tax breaks.

REFORMS WOULD INCLUDE INFRASTRUCTURE BANK

A permanent infrastructure bank would help finance big-ticket transport projects by combining federal, state and local government funds with private financing. There has been little congressional interest in the idea.

The White House says the bank would have more insulation from political pressure than traditional approaches such as formulas that divide money among states or guarantee funding for various ideas.

At the same time, the administration would consolidate more than 100 transportation programs and use performance measurements to award money. Factors such as safety, environmental sustainability and economic competitiveness would be considered.

WHITE HOUSE PLAN REQUIRES CONGRESSIONAL ACTION

The White House says its proposed $50 billion would be part of the traditional long-term transportation bill that must be developed in Congress.

The administration has not said if it supports a $500 billion, six-year bill for highways, rail and transit that is being assembled by the House of Representatives Transportation Committee.

The $500 billion is nearly double the amount of the last authorization, which expired in 2009.

In the past, the administration suggested that work on a long-term bill could be delayed until 2011, after this year's November 2 congressional elections.

Congressional work on the transportation bill slowed this year due to questions how to pay for the work. Gasoline tax revenue, one traditional source of money, dwindled during the recession.

The House passed a bill in July for $79 billion in transportation spending, more than half of it for roads and bridges, in the fiscal year that begins on Oct 1. The Senate has yet to act. Work on legislation to modernize the aviation system stalled just before Congress recessed for August.

The $50 billion plan proposed by Obama would roughly double the $27 billion approved for transportation by the stimulus bill.

(Reporting by John Crawley and Charles Abbott in Washington; Editing by Philip Barbara and Peter Cooney)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
donm wrote:
Increased spending,increase national debt, as other manufacturing countries recover
may give a temporary boost to America, and get our president re-elected, but a secure economic future for America needs manufacturing jobs forever. The manufacturing industry should let workers know, jobs that will last in manufacturing will not be created by new investments in our country, knowing that the Federal Government is going to continue a policy to foster economic globalization as the way to addressing our economic problem. The“economic pass” that has been given to foreign ships polluting our waters with ballast discharges and carbon emmissions as they bring their foreign manufactured products into our country and this administration not addressing the issues of one Senator Boxer, who objected to historic legislation passed by the House (395-7) in 2008, and the then delaying action on ballast water with another study to coincide with a 20 year military plan , shows those who manufacture goods that a policy of economic globalization is still being pursued over economic Americanization, and will continue to stiffle the cost of manufacturing in our country. This is especially evident by a report created in 2009 for congress that describes the cost of national ballast water legislation mandating installation of technology. The report suggest the cost would be incurred by, mainly foreign ships, bring foreign imports into our country and this would cause the cost of imports to rise. Currently our military is offering incentives to foreign ships, importing foreign goods, to install technology to protect our waters. If they leveled the playing field with legislation that protected our water, and our commander and chief directed the military to worry about enforcement, rather than offering incentives to ease the problems that cost, would create for foreign shipping bringing foreign manufactured goods into our country, manufacturing may again decide to investment in America. Back in the 1990’s environmentalist were not happy with President Clintons, help to delegate ballast water under the Clean Water Act, to the EPA, they knew then with all the new free trade treaties and visions of economic globalization being the way for America’s future that his plan had holes in it.

Sep 08, 2010 6:36pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.