A handout photograph distributed by Syria's national news agency SANA on May 22,2013, show detained men, blindfolded and handcuffed, described by SANA as "terrorists fighters", a term commonly used to describe rebels fighting to topple President Bashar al-Assad, in Qusair, near Homs.    SANA/Handout via Reuters (SYRIA - Tags: CONFLICT CIVIL UNREST TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY) ATTENTION EDITORS - THIS IMAGE WAS PROVIDED BY A THIRD PARTY. FOR EDITORIAL USE ONLY. NOT FOR SALE FOR MARKETING OR ADVERTISING CAMPAIGNS. THIS PICTURE IS DISTRIBUTED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED BY REUTERS, AS A SERVICE TO CLIENTS

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more 

Photo

Devastated by Tornado

A huge tornado tears through an Oklahoma City suburb.  Slideshow 

Photo

Message of humility

A religious fraternity in Rio considers the election of Pope Francis, a confirmation of their beliefs in poverty and simplicity.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Senate, House eye action on China currency

Related Topics

An employee counts U.S. dollar banknotes at a branch of Industrial and Commercial Bank of China in Huaibei, Anhui province September 7, 2010. REUTERS/Stringer

An employee counts U.S. dollar banknotes at a branch of Industrial and Commercial Bank of China in Huaibei, Anhui province September 7, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Stringer

WASHINGTON | Wed Sep 8, 2010 6:41pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A volatile political environment is boosting the possibility that U.S. lawmakers will pass legislation designed to prod China into letting its currency rise more rapidly against the dollar.

"The chances are certainly on the rise, I think for two reasons," Jeremie Waterman, senior director for China at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, told Reuters.

The first is the testy political atmosphere ahead of November congressional elections that has many Democrats in fear of losing their seats, and the other is the "very limited progress" Beijing has made revaluing its yuan since a high-profile announcement in June, Waterman said.

China said in June that it would permit market forces greater sway in setting the yuan's value, yet it has only appreciated about 0.6 percent since then.

Pressure is building in both the House of Representatives and Senate over the issue, creating some nervousness among analysts about the risk that legislative proposals may stir more trade tensions.

A bipartisan group of senators led by New York Democrat Charles Schumer and Republican Lindsey Graham have insisted throughout the year that have more than enough votes to win approval of a China currency bill.

The House Ways and Means Committee already has a hearing set for September 15 when members of Congress who support action on China's currency would appear, as well as a panel of outside experts.

With a weak recovery constraining job creation and fanning voter anger, sources said they expected the Senate Banking Committee to also hold a hearing on September 16, with U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner in the hot seat.

The hearings would occur when frustration at persistently high U.S. unemployment at nearly 10 percent is a growing threat to Democrats' chances at retaining control of Congress in November and is a goad to lawmakers seeking a target for soaring U.S. deficits.

"There is no real question that China's deliberately undervalued exchange rate is unfair, contributes to global trade imbalances, and costs the United States jobs and economic growth, particularly in the manufacturing sector," Ways and Means Committee Chairman Sander Levin said in a statement on Wednesday.

UNFAIR PRICE ADVANTAGE

U.S. lawmakers and some business groups insist the yuan, also called the renminbi, is undervalued so low it gives Chinese manufacturers an unfair price advantage in U.S. markets and has cost millions of lost American jobs.

To date, the Obama administration has declined to name China a currency manipulator in semi-annual reports issued by the U.S. Treasury. Such a declaration would initiate a process requiring discussion with Beijing about its currency policy and potentially clear the way for trade sanctions against its products.

The Nelson Report, a newsletter focused on U.S. relations with Asia, reported the potential back-to-back U.S. Senate and House hearings in its Tuesday edition and raised expectations that Geithner could testify at both.

However, the Senate Banking Committee still has not officially announced a hearing and the U.S. Treasury Department has declined comment on whether Geithner would testify. Ways and Means also has not released a witness list.

Some analysts monitoring the situation in Congress with some alarm for fear it aggravates global trade tensions.

Dan Griswold, director of trade policy at the Cato Institute, said he saw "a real danger" that either the House or Senate could pass China currency legislation, but hoped President Barack Obama would exert enough pressure to keep a bill from reaching his desk.

With Democrats in fear of losing control of Congress, "perhaps they're desperate to respond to populist worries about the economy and energize their union base," Griswold said.

Lawmakers have threatened to take legislative action against China in the past but backed down in hope that negotiation would eventually succeed in persuading Beijing that it was in its interests and those of the global trade satem to let its currency's value be set by market forces.

Gary Hufbauer, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, said the House was the more likely of the two chambers to take action on a China currency bill.

"My guess is that the administration's position would be not to blast it frontally, but to try to slow it down in the House in a quiet way," Hufbauer said.

(Reporting by Doug Palmer, editing by Philip Barbara)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (7)
lwxzj wrote:
If it was ten years ago, Chinese Yuan was under-valued, comparing to US dollar. After so many years of high growth /inflation and appreciation against US dollar, Chinese Yuan is fair-valued or over-valued now, not under-valued at all. These US politicians can not catch up the rapid change in China. If they go to visit China now, they will find out this kind of change in China.

Sep 08, 2010 11:53pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
jwws9999 wrote:
it’s time to label china a currency manipulator, place tariffs on their imports to the US, and go on with life. Trade with china has been a failure from the beginning

Sep 09, 2010 6:46am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Pete_Murphy wrote:
If currency valuations are the cause of trade deficits, how does one explain our much larger trade deficits (in per capita terms) with countries like Japan, Germany, Switzerland, etc. (I could go on and on), nations whose currency valuations have been market-driven for decades?

The root cause of our trade deficit with China (like the other nations mentioned above) is the large disparity in population density between them and the U.S. High population densities render them incapable of consuming at the same level. In a free trade environment, the work of manufacturing is spread evenly across the combined labor forces but, while we consume more, they consume less. The result is an automatic trade deficit for the U.S. and a shift of manufacturing work to the more densely populated nation.

Almost without exception, densely populated nations are either desperately poor or utterly dependent on manfacturing for export to sustain a decent standard of living. To engage in free trade with such nations, without employing tariffs to compensate for the population density effect, is tantamount to economic suicide.

Sep 09, 2010 8:26am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.