U.S. Army Captain Michael Kelvington, commander of the Battle company, 1-508 Parachute Infantry battalion, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, bows next to remains of Gulam Dostager, a member of Afghan Local Police who was killed in the blast of an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) during the joint Tor Janda (Black Flag in Pashtu) operation, in Zahri district of Kandahar province, southern Afghanistan May 25, 2012.  REUTERS/Shamil Zhumatov  (AFGHANISTAN - Tags: MILITARY CIVIL UNREST CONFLICT TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Members of the U.S. Navy Blue Angels fly over the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan as part of the 25th annual Fleet Week celebration in New York, May 23, 2012.  REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz (UNITED STATES - Tags: MILITARY ANNIVERSARY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Fleet Week

The U.S. Navy takes Manhattan for a week.  Slideshow 

Photo

The SpaceX mission

A privately owned unmanned rocket blasts off on a mission to be the first commercial flight to the International Space Station.  Slideshow 

Q+A: Congressional midterm elections

Related Topics

WASHINGTON | Wed Sep 8, 2010 12:10pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A Republican win in even one chamber of the U.S. Congress in the November 2 midterm election would create a huge shake-up in Washington, with far-reaching implications.

Republicans are growing favorites to capture the 39 Democratic seats they need for a House of Representatives majority, and could even pick up the 10 Democratic seats they need to gain Senate control.

Here are some questions and answers about the election and the impact of a potential Republican victory.

WHAT IS THE MOST LIKELY RESULT?

With two months to go, political handicappers are picking Republicans to narrowly win a House majority and make big gains in the Senate, although not enough to give them control.

Charlie Cook of the nonpartisan Cook Political Report wrote Tuesday that his race-by-race analysis showed Republicans are poised to gain at least 40 House seats and possibly more.

"The House has reached the tipping point," Cook wrote.

University of Virginia political scientist Larry Sabato raised his prediction for Republican gains last week to 47 House seats.

In the Senate, Cook predicts a Republican gain of seven to nine seats. Republicans must retain their own Senate seats and sweep nearly all of the competitive Democratic seats to win control, a difficult.

WHY ARE DEMOCRATS IN SUCH TROUBLE?

Worries about the economy, unhappiness with Democratic leadership in Washington and plummeting confidence in President Barack Obama have created a perfect political storm.

Obama has seen his approval ratings slide well below 50 percent over the summer, while the number of Americans who believe the country is on the wrong track has climbed to above 60 percent in most polls.

Most polls show the sweeping healthcare overhaul passed by Democrats in Congress remains unpopular with a majority of Americans, and public dissatisfaction with congressional Democrats is widespread.

Obama's popularity among independents, a crucial bloc that backed him in 2008, has dipped below 50 percent in many polls, and Republicans are more enthusiastic about the election and more likely to vote than Democrats.

Obama and Democrats got no help last week from the latest jobless report, which showed the unemployment rate inching up to 9.6 percent.

WHAT KEY RACES COULD DECIDE HOUSE AND SENATE CONTROL?

In the House, Democrats elected in Republican-leaning districts in 2008 with the help of a heavy Democratic turnout fueled by Obama's candidacy are struggling to hold their seats in the face of a growing Republican wave.

The fate of first-term Democratic incumbents like Virginia's Tom Perriello, Colorado's Betsy Markey, Ohio's John Boccieri and Florida's Alan Grayson could be crucial to the balance of power.

In the Senate, a handful of veteran Democrats facing unexpectedly tough re-election races could decide the outcome, including Democratic leader Harry Reid of Nevada, Russ Feingold of Wisconsin, Patty Murray of Washington and Barbara Boxer of California.

Democrats are keeping an eye on two races they thought would be cakewalks, the Connecticut battle for retiring Democratic Senator Chris Dodd's seat and the election to replace late West Virginia Senator Robert Byrd.

If Republicans pull a surprise win in either state it could be the end for Democratic Senate hopes.

WHAT WOULD REPUBLICAN LEADERSHIP IN CONGRESS MEAN?

A Republican win in either the House or Senate, or both, could mean gridlock and political conflict -- and plenty of it.

Republican majorities would slam the brakes on Obama's legislative agenda, but would find it nearly impossible to pass new initiatives that did not have considerable Democratic support.

Even if Republicans muscled partisan bills through the House, Democrats in the Senate would be able to block them through either majority votes or a procedural tactic that takes 60 votes to overcome.

That could mean Republicans will be forced to work with moderate Democrats in both chambers if they want to pass legislation -- particularly since Obama will be waiting to veto any bill that does not pass muster among Democrats.

Republican majorities would put House leader John Boehner and Senate leader Mitch McConnell in charge, and they would set the agendas for their chambers while trying to manage more conservative Republican caucuses.

Republicans also would run committees and gain subpoena power that would make it easy to investigate the Obama administration and force witnesses to testify.

WHAT ISSUES WOULD A REPUBLICAN CONGRESS FOCUS ON?

On the campaign trail, Republicans have pushed lower spending, the extension of expiring tax breaks and the repeal of the healthcare overhaul.

Undoing key elements of the Obama agenda -- the stimulus spending and the healthcare bill -- would be a high Republican priority. Democrats, however, probably would have enough backing to block the moves in the Senate, and Obama would veto the effort anyway.

On foreign policy, Obama's troop escalation in Afghanistan drew support from most Republicans, with the prime opposition coming from his fellow Democrats. His planned troop withdrawal next year would likely draw Republican opposition, however.

WHAT DOES IT MEAN FOR THE 2012 WHITE HOUSE RACE?

A Democratic loss would be a bruising blow to Obama, who entered the White House with high public hopes in January 2009. He has helped push through Congress a broad economic stimulus bill and ambitious overhauls of the healthcare system and financial regulations.

But the loss also would free Obama to engage in direct battle with Republican congressional leaders and presidential contenders, giving him a new set of political foils and somewhere else to point the finger of blame when things go wrong.

Obama would have a role model in former President Bill Clinton, a Democrat who saw Republicans capture Congress in a 1994 sweep two years into his term.

But Clinton easily won re-election in 1996 after moving to the center and winning a budget showdown with Republican House Speaker Newt Gingrich over the closing of the federal government.

WHAT IS AT STAKE FOR THE REPUBLICAN PARTY?

Win or lose, Republicans face an internal battle over the future of the party after this year's success of the grassroots conservative "Tea Party" movement.

The movement, which favors limited government, low taxes and less government spending, could be well represented in the new Congress and push the party and its presidential contenders to the right.

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
mjimih wrote:
the polls are taken by land line phones, which are mostly older folks who sit by the phone in their living rooms, which are more distrustful, less hopeful, and less progressive than the younger MAJORITY of folks running around with cell phones. There are more cell phone people now than land line people. Also there are more progressive types than trickle-downer right-wing types. This means the polls portending doom for the Dems are INNACCURATE.

Sep 08, 2010 10:27am EDT  --  Report as abuse
ElroyFromIowa wrote:
You are right there are more people without land lines, but the demographic isn’t necessarily age based. A lot of us older conservatives don’t have land lines either.

While most of the people you are exposed to probably think like you. The fact of the matter is there really are more conservatives than “progressives” in this country today. And every time the President or someone from Congress opens their mouth there are even more.

But I distrust these polls too. But for other reasons. I would hope that we could have a stalemated government so we could all get on with our lives, but it is too early to tell. And the dems have a lot of money to spend influencing the few people who watch television which might be enough to hold both houses by narrow margins which the President will consider a mandate – then imagine the scope of the stupid ideas that will come out of his mouth!

Sep 08, 2010 12:35pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
mjimih wrote:
“..then imagine the scope of the stupid ideas that will come out of his mouth!”

he’s a quantum leap in smartness compared to the (s)elected Bush who repuglican’ts thought was gonna be a good leader. DUMB. And McCain picks a idiot to run with and repuglican’ts don’t even bat an eye. dumb n dumber, yeah were the stupid ones. The polls are basically right-wing propaganda.

Sep 08, 2010 5:52pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.