Karzai aims to limit foreign role in probes: report

Related Topics

Afghan President Hamid Karzai speaks during a meeting with U.S. senator John Kerry at the Presidential Palace in Kabul August 20, 2010. REUTERS/Yuri Cortez/Pool

Afghan President Hamid Karzai speaks during a meeting with U.S. senator John Kerry at the Presidential Palace in Kabul August 20, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Yuri Cortez/Pool

WASHINGTON | Thu Sep 9, 2010 1:52am EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Afghan President Hamid Karzai intends to impose rules restricting international involvement in anti-corruption investigations, The Washington Post reported on Thursday.

Under the proposed rules, U.S. and other foreign law enforcement specialists in two anti-corruption organizations in the Interior Ministry would have no direct involvement in investigations, the report said.

"The management will be Afghan, and the decision-makers will be Afghan, and the investigators will be Afghan," Karzai's chief of staff, Mohammad Umer Daudzai, told the newspaper in a telephone interview on Wednesday.

Foreign advisers, most of whom work for the U.S. Justice Department, will be limited to "training and coaching, but not decision-making," Daudzai was quoted as saying.

The planned changes have alarmed U.S. officials in Kabul and Washington and prompted efforts to try to persuade Karzai and his advisers to soften the restrictions, the report said.

"What he's proposing would effectively neuter these two bodies," a U.S. official involved in Afghanistan policy told the newspaper.

Karzai's advisers think that U.S. officials have de facto control over the key anti-corruption groups, the Post said.

"There is suspicion that the international partners have a decision-making role," Daudzai said. But U.S. officials insist that the Afghan leaders are in complete control, the report said.

Washington fears widespread corruption is helping to boost the Taliban-led insurgency and complicating efforts to strengthen central government control so U.S. and other foreign troops can begin withdrawing from July 2011.

Karzai promised that fighting graft would be his top priority when he was sworn in for a second five-year term, echoing demands from U.S. counterpart Barack Obama, but frustration is growing over Karzai's willingness to tackle corruption.

Karzai has acknowledged that Afghanistan "like all countries" has problems with graft, but said the issue had been "blown out of proportion" by Western media.

(Writing by Joanne Allen; Editing by Eric Walsh)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
If that is how Karzia wants it, fine. Just restrict the funds the U.S. and other NATO countries provide. If we can’t investigate the misuse of money we provide and the projects they finance the the funds will no longer be available to the Afghan government. The United States government would be completely negligent of its resposiblites to the American taxpayer to not retain oversight of the use of taxpayer funds. NOT OVERSIGHT NO MONEY! ! ! The U.S. can’t keep turning a blind eye toward Karzia and his corrupt regime. This guy and his fellow crooks are ripping us off big time. Money is pooring into Afghanistan and flowing out the backdoor to private bank accouts of Afghan officials and phony business owners. Once the U.S. military pull out of the country all these little government mobsters will abandon the country and its people and move to Europe to spend all that money they have stashed at our exspense. It’s very hard to believe our people in charge are that gullible or stupid to agree to this. TIME TO GET OUT OF AFGHANISTAN…

Sep 09, 2010 2:26am EDT  --  Report as abuse
RedRider39 wrote:
Just how obvious does it have to get before we lay down the law to Karzai about graft? His insistence on not allowing foreigners to investigate corruption is a clear indication he intends to protect the corrupt…. including himself. But no, we continue to allow ourselves to be used, expend Americans lives, and waste millions of dollars lining the pockets of thieves. If we abruptly leave Afghanistan, the Taliban will likely quickly take over the country and kill Karzai, and I’m sure he knows that. On second though, maybe that wouldn’t be a bad thing. Once they are all in one place we could bomb them back into the stone age and maybe we’d finally get Bin Laden.

Sep 09, 2010 2:37am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.