Consumers unsure about healthcare changes: poll

A customer takes a look at medication on a shelf at a pharmacy in New York December 23, 2009. REUTERS/Lucas Jackson

A customer takes a look at medication on a shelf at a pharmacy in New York December 23, 2009.

Credit: Reuters/Lucas Jackson

WASHINGTON | Thu Sep 9, 2010 10:41am EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Most U.S. adults are still not sure when they will see certain changes from major healthcare reforms passed earlier this year, according to a new survey.

Researchers for the nation's insurance commissioners found that most people know the changes require coverage of young adults up to age 26 and bar health insurers from refusing to cover sick children. But they found just 14 percent of those polled knew those early provisions, among others, take effect September 23.

"People are woefully underinformed ... in spite of the fact that we've had all this national discussion around health reform," said Sandy Praeger, the insurance commissioner for Kansas and head of the health insurance committee for the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC), which conducted the poll. The survey is to be released on Monday.

The findings come amid renewed debate about the healthcare law ahead of U.S. congressional elections in November. While President Barack Obama and fellow Democrats cite the expansion of health insurance access as a top achievement, Republicans are campaigning against it and vowing to repeal the law.

In another study published on Thursday, government researchers found dramatic shifts for payers under the health care law even as the nation's overall health care costs remain unchanged.

More than half of the adults surveyed believed that all employers must now offer health insurance for their workers, although the law -- passed in March -- exempts certain small businesses.

Nearly half also mistakenly thought that starting this month, health insurers had to cover preventive health services without requiring a co-payment, according to the survey. The bill does call for certain minimum coverage for some preventive care.

NAIC, which has risen in prominence amid the healthcare debate and is helping to shape various provisions affecting insurers' bottom lines, polled 1,000 adults by phone from August 12 to August 15.

Praeger said that most people probably don't know about expected coverage changes because they are not directly affected yet. That will change as open enrollment season starts and people have to pick their coverage options for next year, she told Reuters.

"They'll know about it soon because there will be more information going out," she said.

(Editing by Philip Barbara)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
5em7a wrote:
if we had a good diet we wouldn’t need all this health care

Sep 09, 2010 4:11am EDT  --  Report as abuse
pwndcake wrote:
Two weeks ago I started the process to get on the kidney transplant list. Thankfully, if I spend the average time on the wait list, I’ll get my kidney just in time to be able to get insurance to help cover the cost of the anti-rejection medications I’ll need. There’s a lot in the changes I didn’t know, like a subsidy to help me pay for the meds I need before insurance companies can no longer deny me based on pre-existing condition. It changes the cost I was going to have to pay for meds per month from around $2000, to around $400. Which is still a lot of money, but a lot more manageable.

The more I find out about the changes the happier I am it passed when it did.

Sep 09, 2010 4:26am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.