Analysis: Obama makes tax cuts a centerpiece of campaign

WASHINGTON | Fri Sep 10, 2010 1:33pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Barack Obama dared Republicans on Friday to wage an election campaign on tax cuts, telling voters his opponents are the party of the rich and all but ruling out a compromise before November elections.

In a rare news conference, Obama opened the door to negotiation with Republicans over tax cuts but then abruptly slammed it shut and went on the offensive to convince Americans that his opponents have no new ideas and are holding the economic recovery hostage over politics.

Here are some key interpretations of Obama's comments.

* Obama said the door was open for talks with Republicans over extending Bush-era tax cuts, but then he quickly slammed it shut, saying their ideas are not good ones.

"We can have a further conversation about how they want to spend an additional $700 billion to give an average of $100,000 to millionaires. That, I think, is a bad idea."

* The president threw down the gauntlet on taxes, telling Democrats and Republicans he was ready to wage a campaign against Republicans who support tax cuts for the wealthy. Drawing from a traditional Democratic playbook, he cast Republicans as the party of the rich and unconcerned about the newly unemployed.

"Why hold the middle class hostage in order to do something that most economists don't think make sense? What I'm saying is let's do what we agree to and that the American people overwhelmingly agree to, which is let's give certainty to families out there that are having a tough time."

* Obama's other message for voters? Republican economic policies got us in trouble, and they are still peddling exactly the same plans today.

"The policies that the Republicans are offering right now are the exact policies that got us into this mess," he said.

"It's not a situation where they went and reflected and said to themselves, 'You know what? We didn't do some things right. And so we've got a whole bunch of new ideas out here that we want to present to you that -- that we think are going to help put us on the path of strong growth.'"

* Obama pointed to Republican action to block a small business bill in Congress as evidence that they are more interested in playing politics than creating jobs. He trumpeted the defection of Republican Senator George Voinovich, whose newly declared support for the legislation now that he's no longer running for office means it is now likely to pass.

(Editing by Will Dunham)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
minuteman wrote:
If Goolsbe is his best economic advisor and we have the economy in the ideolog mess with anti business agenda’s and class warfare being waged, then this socialist is part of the problem not the solution. Obama is defiant in his continued drive to socialize America. Class warfare is not part of the American political system and should never be. The wealthy should be commended for having climed from poverty to success and created jobs; new businesse. Obama seems hell bent on turning out his Obamanista’s to wage war against fellow Americans all because they are successful. This ideology is typical of a Obama’s era of social revolution and Chicago thuggery.
November must be the month we, the voters, begin the ending of this socialist experiment to change the order of America. The “tired, the poor,the down trodden, the masses,” are not suppose to be able to make a success of themselves, according to the Obama ideology because they will be declared as the 2 percent who is paying 70 percent of the taxes to support the 49 percent of the Americans who pay absolutely no taxes.

Sep 11, 2010 5:08am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Richie5 wrote:
Democrats turn on Obama, many have said if loses are large in November Obama will suffer for his destruction of the Democratic party. Many have said they will help impeach Obama for not being a U.S. citizen, they say Ried and Palosi Vented Obama knowing he was not an American? They say the Democratic party is dividing into three pieces, Progressive left, Blue Dog and Black Cacus? OBAMA, THE SUM OF ALL FEARS.

Sep 11, 2010 9:34am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Richie5 wrote:
Large volumes of Democrats are moving to distance themselves from Obama, the word on the street is that Obama is being dumped by the Progressives and Blue Dogs. Obama is said to be a liability to Party members and the best way to resolve the issue is to remove him from the Party. It has been said by reliable sources that if they do not take decicive action against Obama he could destory the Party or set it back for decades. The decission has been made to leak the facts of Obama’s Venting to the Media allowing his Impeachment to move forward? It is widely known that Reid and Palosi knew Obama was not a U.S. citizen and the documents of his Venting are in question? Democrats don’t want to take credit for his Impeachment but see this as a viable way to remove Obama and save the Party.

Sep 11, 2010 9:19pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.