A handout photograph distributed by Syria's national news agency SANA on May 22,2013, show detained men, blindfolded and handcuffed, described by SANA as "terrorists fighters", a term commonly used to describe rebels fighting to topple President Bashar al-Assad, in Qusair, near Homs.    SANA/Handout via Reuters

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more 

Photo

Devastated by Tornado

A huge tornado tears through an Oklahoma City suburb.  Slideshow 

Photo

The drone wars

The frontlines of America's covert drone program.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

California seeks China's help for high-speed rail

Related Topics

California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger speaks during a Bay Area Council business event in Shanghai September 13, 2010. REUTERS/Aly Song

California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger speaks during a Bay Area Council business event in Shanghai September 13, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Aly Song

SHANGHAI | Mon Sep 13, 2010 1:07am EDT

SHANGHAI (Reuters) - California will seek China's help in financing its high-speed rail system and welcome bids from Chinese firms to help build it, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger said on Monday.

Earlier this year, California was awarded $2.25 billion of the $8 billion set aside for high-speed rail projects under the U.S. government's stimulus plan. The state plans to build a high-speed line between Los Angeles and San Francisco.

"We look to China to build our high speed rail, to be part of the bidding process that we are going to go through," Schwarzenegger told a gather of U.S. businesses in Shanghai.

"Many countries will be bidding to build our high-speed rail, (and we plan) also to look for financing from China," he said.

The $8 billion, part of the $863 billion American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, will introduce high-speed rail to a country that has long relied on a vast interstate highway network and air travel.

Completing high-speed lines will require a mix of federal, state and private investment, experts have said.

California, which has entered into its fiscal year without a budget signed into law, has seen its financial problems crimp its ability to move ahead with projects such as the high-speed rail.

Last year, California temporarily issued IOUs during a lengthy budget impasse.

U.S. government transportation officials have also recently toured China and other Asian countries as the United States embarks on its plans to build more high-speed rail lines.

(Reporting by Melanie Lee; Editing by Jason Subler)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (6)
broketaxpayer wrote:
Well heck, why not. All the steel for the new San Francisco Bay Bridge came from China. All the money China earned from that can now be “invested” back in California. In effect we are using money that was originally ours that could have gone to our own steel mills, and our own jobs to help our own economy but now we are borrowing it back with interest. Are we nuts???

Sep 13, 2010 3:03pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
speakuplouder wrote:
Besides having a bankrupt state trying to build a railroad that will keep bleeding the state fiscally, they use the porkulus funds that were earmarked for creating jobs in US to create jobs in China? Great job, California, as always.

Sep 13, 2010 3:03pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
MyLostReality wrote:
Why do so many people have so much sand up their v’s about good ideas like this? It’s like every idea that the government has is greeted with supreme suspicion without even analyzing the benefit. Tea politics is just lazy.

Sep 13, 2010 5:39pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.