WRAPUP 3-U.S. Senate Republicans firm on tax cuts for rich

Mon Sep 13, 2010 7:16pm EDT

Related Topics

 * McConnell vows to introduce tax-freeze bill
 * Senate back from recess with short session
 * Bitter debate ahead of November congressional elections
 (Adds options to vote or delay, capital gains tax question)
 By Kim Dixon and Andy Sullivan
 WASHINGTON, Sept 13 (Reuters) - Republicans in the U.S.
Senate poured cold water on Monday on hopes for a compromise
with President Barack Obama that would have allowed Bush-era
tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans to expire.
 Taxes have become a flashpoint going into a Nov. 2 election
in which Republicans are seeking to wrest control of Congress
from the president's fellow Democrats. Obama says the cost of
keeping the tax cuts for the rich is too high as the United
States emerges from recession with a massive budget deficit.
 The uncertainty over tax policy is hanging over the slow
economic recovery and is keeping investors guessing about what
will happen to taxes on capital gains and dividends.
 Prospects faded for breaking the deadlock when Republicans
gave a cool reception to a signal on Sunday by John Boehner,
their party's leader in the House of Representatives, that he
might be willing to bend.
 In a political gambit, Senate Republican Leader Mitch
McConnell proposed a freeze on all tax brackets, insisting that
cuts for wealthier Americans, as well as for the middle class,
must be kept in place.
 "I'm introducing legislation today that ensures that no one
in this country will pay higher income taxes next year than
they are right now," McConnell said on the Senate floor.
 With control of the Senate, Democrats should be able to
dictate whether there is a vote on the tax question ahead of
the election but it is far from clear if they have enough party
unity on the issue. McConnell may be hoping for enough
defectors to bring his measure to the floor.
 If Congress fails to take any action on the tax cuts
enacted for all Americans under George W. Bush, Obama's
Republican predecessor, then they will expire at the end of
this year.
 Positions are so deeply entrenched and the risks so high
for both sides that lawmakers may opt to put the issue on hold
until after the election.
 <^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  Take a Look                                 [nN07236307]
  Graphic-Obama's challenges
   link.reuters.com/tem72p
  Insider-Obama talks to small business
   link.reuters.com/qyf33p
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^>
 "WRESTLING MATCH"
 Obama raised the stakes last week by accusing Republicans
of holding middle-class tax cuts hostage to salvage lower rates
for the rich.
 In Fairfax, Virginia, on Monday, the president pressed his
case for keeping the Bush tax cuts only for families making
$250,000 or less a year and blamed the Republican leadership
for a "wrestling match" that has held up action.
 "We just can't afford it," he said of the estimated $700
billion that would be needed over a decade to keep the tax cuts
for higher income brackets.
 Obama has portrayed his push for maintaining lower taxes
for most Americans as critical to bolstering the economy, which
is expected to weigh heavily on the prospects for Democrats in
the November elections.
 Republicans say wealthier Americans are drivers of the
economy and that tax cuts for them help the whole country.
 Democrats could bring up the measure in the Senate next
week, hoping to force Republicans to vote against a popular
middle-class tax cut ahead of the elections. Democratic aides
cautioned that no firm decisions had been made.
 The danger for Democrats -- even if Republicans manage to
block the move -- is their opponents on the campaign trail
could then cast them as tax raisers in a struggling economy.
 Don Stewart, McConnell's spokesman, said Senate Republicans
were united and had enough votes to block Obama's plan.
 Some Democrats have distanced themselves from Obama's call
to let tax cuts expire for individuals earning more than
$200,000 per year and families earning more than $250,000,
arguing the economic recovery is too weak to impose tax hikes.
 Republicans are also sending mixed signals.
 Boehner said on Sunday that, if given no other choice, he
would support extending tax cuts for the middle class even if
cuts for the wealthy are allowed to expire.
 But Eric Cantor, the No. 2 Republican in the House, showed
no sign of backing away on Monday from a full renewal of the
Bush cuts and called for a vote on whether to extend them.
 Several opinion polls show a majority of Americans support
letting the tax cuts for the rich expire but the issue has made
some Democrats nervous before the election in which many of
their seats are in jeopardy.
 Lawmakers are just back from a summer recess and most
analysts believe that, with roughly two weeks of legislating
time left before they break again, the tax issue could get
punted to after the election.
 Also, there is still no consensus on how to deal with
levies on capital gains and dividends, now taxed at 15 percent
for high earners. Republicans want to keep that rate, while
Obama wants to raise both to 20 percent for individuals making
more than $200,000 and families earning above $250,000.
 If Congress fails to act, the rate will hit about 40
percent for high earners.
 "I don't think it makes sense to raise any federal taxes
during the uncertain economy we are struggling through,"
Independent Senator Joe Lieberman, a former Democrat, said in a
statement on Monday.
 (Additional reporting by Thomas Ferraro, Steve Holland and
Donna Smith; Writing by Matt Spetalnick; Editing by John
O'Callaghan)
FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (34)
Kurtiss wrote:
“We just can’t afford it,” he said of the cost of keeping tax cuts for higher income brackets.

As compared to $4,000,000,000,000.00 in new debt, which we can apparently afford.

Sep 13, 2010 6:55pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Lingam wrote:
Problem: $250K per year is not rich anymore. Most people who make $250K per year and work for a living are not millionaires, and many of them work harder for that $250K than would readily be believed. If the bracket were to be raised to $1M per year, that would leave out most professionals and small business owners and they might find more support.

Sep 13, 2010 7:19pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Carolynr wrote:
As a Conservative, I am not a big fan of McConnell either. It’s old guard Republican ideas and concepts. However, I am for extending all the tax cuts. Funny that Obama speaks about taking care of the lower end of the financial spectrum and yet their taxes will be increased by 50%. That is terrible. Yet..we do know that Sir Isaac Newton was right with his theory on gravity. What you say?? I say that the upper tier of our society provides the income, the jobs and the investment to allow all of our tiers to work. Yes, I believe in trickle down economics…because Obama’s trickle up…well..it has not worked and besides..Newton proved it.

Sep 13, 2010 7:24pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.