Wind could have parted Red Sea for Moses?

WASHINGTON Tue Sep 21, 2010 2:15pm EDT

An illustration showing how a strong wind could push back waters from two ancient basins--a lagoon (left) and a river (right)--to create a temporary land bridge. REUTERS/Illustration by Nicolle Rager Fuller/University Corporation for Atmospheric Research

An illustration showing how a strong wind could push back waters from two ancient basins--a lagoon (left) and a river (right)--to create a temporary land bridge.

Credit: Reuters/Illustration by Nicolle Rager Fuller/University Corporation for Atmospheric Research

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Moses might not have parted the Red Sea, but a strong east wind that blew through the night could have pushed the waters back in the way described in biblical writings and the Koran, U.S. researchers reported on Tuesday.

Computer simulations, part of a larger study on how winds affect water, show wind could push water back at a point where a river bent to merge with a coastal lagoon, the team at the National Center for Atmospheric Research and the University of Colorado at Boulder said.

"The simulations match fairly closely with the account in Exodus," Carl Drews of NCAR, who led the study, said in a statement.

"The parting of the waters can be understood through fluid dynamics. The wind moves the water in a way that's in accordance with physical laws, creating a safe passage with water on two sides and then abruptly allowing the water to rush back in."

Religious texts differ a little in the tale, but all describe Moses leading the Israelites out of Egypt ahead of a pharaoh's armies around 3,000 years ago. The Red Sea parts to let Moses and his followers pass safely, then crashes back onto the pursuers, drowning them.

Drews and colleagues are studying how Pacific Ocean typhoons can drive storm surges and other effects of strong and sustained winds on deep water.

His team pinpointed a possible site south of the Mediterranean Sea for the legendary crossing, and modeled different land formations that could have existed then and perhaps led to the accounts of the sea appearing to part.

The model requires a U-shaped formation of the Nile River and a shallow lagoon along the shoreline. It shows that a wind of 63 miles per hour, blowing steadily for 12 hours, could have pushed back waters 6 feet deep.

"This land bridge is 3-4 km (2 to 2.5 miles) long and 5 km (3 miles) wide, and it remains open for 4 hours," they wrote in the Public Library of Science journal PLoS ONE.

"People have always been fascinated by this Exodus story, wondering if it comes from historical facts," Drews said. "What this study shows is that the description of the waters parting indeed has a basis in physical laws."

Details of the model described can be seen here and www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0012481.

(Editing by Jerry Norton)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (12)
r1ghtm1nd wrote:
“What this study shows is that the description of the waters parting indeed has a basis in physical laws.” But really they are trying to create a physical law/situation to validate the biblical account. That’s bad science.

Johnny… did you steal the cookie? No mom, soviet ninjas with weapons of mass destruction have taken the cookies hostage when you went to the bathroom.

Sep 21, 2010 4:19pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
bobw111 wrote:
Interesting. Atheists say that everything in the Bible is complete fiction and that only science is real.

Than when scientist give a plausible basis for an incident in the Bible they flip and say the scientifically arrived at results are “bad science”.

Mommy, are scientists always wrong? No Johnny, only when they arrive at plausible explanations for incidents described in the Bible…

Sep 21, 2010 5:03pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
r1ghtm1nd wrote:
Actually atheists don’t say everything in the bible is fiction. They say God doesn’t exist.

Just because something in the bible is true, does not make God real. Just because something in the bible is fake, does not make God fake. The existence of God does not make the bible true. God didn’t write the bible, people did.

A scientist can be a Christian and still recognize that bad science is still bad science. You can not truly believe in something until you have thought about it.

Sep 21, 2010 9:21pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.