U.N. nuclear assembly rejects Arab move targeting Israel

VIENNA Fri Sep 24, 2010 4:37pm EDT

International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Director General Yukiya Amano (C) attends a board of governors meeting at the UN headquarters in Vienna, September 13, 2010. REUTERS/Herwig Prammer

International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Director General Yukiya Amano (C) attends a board of governors meeting at the UN headquarters in Vienna, September 13, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Herwig Prammer

Related Topics

VIENNA (Reuters) - Member states of the U.N. nuclear watchdog narrowly rejected an Arab-sponsored resolution on Friday calling on Israel to join a global anti-atomic weapons treaty, a U.S. victory after a bruising diplomatic battle.

Washington had urged countries to vote down the symbolically important although non-binding resolution, saying it could derail broader efforts to ban nuclear warheads in the Middle East and also damage fresh Israeli-Palestinian peace talks.

"The winner here is the peace process, the winner here is the opportunity to move forward with a zone free of weapons of mass destruction in the Middle East," said Glyn Davies, the U.S. ambassador to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

He spoke after a tense debate that highlighted deep divisions between largely Western states and developing nations.

Israel is widely believed to hold the Middle East's only nuclear arsenal and is also the only country in the tinderbox region outside the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).

Arab states backed by Iran say this poses a threat to peace and stability. They want Israel to subject all its atomic facilities to IAEA monitoring. Israel says it would only join the pact if there is a comprehensive Middle East peace.

The envoy of Iran, accused by the West of seeking to develop atomic bombs behind the cover of a declared civilian nuclear energy program, called the outcome a setback for the NPT and vowed that the drive to push Israel to sign on would not end.

"This is an irreversible road," Ali Asghar Soltanieh said.

Israel has never confirmed nor denied having atomic bombs, under a policy of ambiguity to deter its Arab and Islamic foes.


Forty-six delegations voted in favor of the resolution and 51 against. Other delegations in the general assembly of the 151-member IAEA either abstained or were absent.

A similar resolution expressing concern at "Israel's Nuclear Capabilities" was approved in a close vote at last year's General Conference, as the annual IAEA gathering is known.

"The vote result is an important victory for the moral stand in the face of extremism and hypocrisy," Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman told Israel's Army Radio.

Several smaller countries, including some in Latin America, who were absent in 2009 voted against the measure this time. Like last year, Russia and China supported the text, showing big power differences on the issue.

Israel and the United States regard Iran as the Middle East's main proliferation threat. Tehran says its nuclear program is for power generation purposes only.

If it signed the NPT, Israel would have to renounce nuclear weaponry. Arab states say there cannot be genuine peace in the Middle East until Israel abandons nuclear weapons.

"There should be no nuclear power in the Middle East. We need to ensure that the Middle East is free from all nuclear weapons," Arab League Secretary-General Amr Moussa told a news conference during the United Nations General Assembly in New York.

Nuclear expert Mark Hibbs at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace said the result provided some relief for Israel and showed Washington had "left nothing to chance."

But he added: "The Arabs won't be deterred after their defeat today."

U.S. officials had warned that approval of the resolution would erase any chance of Israel attending an Egyptian-proposed conference in 2012 toward establishing a Middle East zone free of weapons of mass destruction.

After the vote, Israel's head delegate Shaul Chorev said he hoped the "positive spirit" he had seen Friday would prevail.

"Israel pledges to do its utmost to promote such spirit and a dialogue," he said.

(Additional reporting by Dan Williams in Jerusalem and Helen Popper at the United Nations; Editing by Eric Beech)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (23)
hempstead1944 wrote:
Although I am not a Jew, I cannot believe that Israel submits to the bullying of the American State Department when its’ homeland is so vulnerable. I also cannot understand why so many Congressman and Senators, who are Jewish, are so silent?

Sep 24, 2010 8:01am EDT  --  Report as abuse
judex wrote:
Neither the article nor the above comment, whose author doesn’t seem to have read the article very closely, is very enlightening. The State Department is backing Israel but that seems to go against its policy of pushing countries with nuclear bombs to join the nonproliferation treaty. Obviously, there is something more in this resolution, but it is impossible to tell from this breathless little report.

Sep 24, 2010 8:20am EDT  --  Report as abuse
judex wrote:
By the way, the US is backing Israel here. Why do you call it bullying? The bigger question is this: what is the USA’s position on Israel nuclear capability. And how do we sell it to the Arabs? And is it -that Israel has the bomb, that Arabs are upset- even important? God, how I hate this kind of blurby information!

Sep 24, 2010 8:25am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.