Acupuncture not helpful for stroke recovery

Related Topics

A patient lies on a bed as he undergoes acupuncture treatment at Beijing's Capital Medical University Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital April 6, 2010. REUTERS/David Gray

A patient lies on a bed as he undergoes acupuncture treatment at Beijing's Capital Medical University Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital April 6, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/David Gray

NEW YORK | Mon Sep 27, 2010 11:04pm EDT

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Acupuncture does not help speed recovery after stroke, according to an analysis of 10 trials using fake or "sham" acupuncture as a control.

"Our meta-analysis of data from rigorous randomized sham-controlled trials did not show a positive effect of acupuncture as a treatment for functional recovery after stroke," Dr. Jae Cheol Kong of Wonkwang University in Iksan, South Korea, and colleagues conclude in the Canadian Medical Association Journal (CMAJ).

Some recent studies have found no benefit for acupuncture when it is compared to sham acupuncture, a placebo version of the traditional Chinese medicine technique that can involve needling non-acupuncture points, penetrating the skin shallowly, or not penetrating the skin at all.

For example, recent studies found acupuncture was not effective for inducing labor, while another showed no benefit of the traditional Chinese technique for improving the success of in vitro fertilization (IVF).

While several reviews of the medical literature on acupuncture for stroke recovery have been published, the authors of the current study note, many have had limitations, for example failing to include studies published in Asian countries.

To address this issue, Kong and colleagues searched 25 databases and 12 Korean traditional medicine journals. Among 664 studies on the topic, the researchers found 10 that met their criteria, including 711 patients in all.

Two of the trials compared real acupuncture to sham electrostimulation, while the other eight used sham acupuncture as a placebo. Several different analyses of the trials found acupuncture did not improve patients' ability to perform activities of daily living, nor did it show improvement in measurements of neurological function. While two studies did find a benefit for acupuncture, "poor reporting and high risks of bias rendered both studies less than reliable," Kong and colleagues write.

The researchers acknowledge that sham acupuncture may not be a true placebo, and could actually be producing physiological effects, which could explain the lack of difference between the fake and real acupuncture groups. Other "drawbacks" to their findings include the lack of data and the often-poor quality of that data, they add.

In an editorial accompanying the study, Dr. Hongmei Wu of West China Hospital in Chengdu argues that given the small size of the studies, as well as the fact that sham acupuncture may actually have some effect, "it is premature to refute the effects of acupuncture in treatment of stroke rehabilitation."

"Rigorously designed, large, multicentre randomized trials are needed to assess the effects of acupuncture on stroke rehabilitation further," Wu concludes.

SOURCE: link.reuters.com/mam65p and link.reuters.com/nam65p CMAJ published online September 27, 2010.

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
mckenzie2178 wrote:
Of course it isn’t. As a medical procedure, acupuncture is in the same category as voodoo. It’s merely an attempt by the Chinese to legitimize quackery to enhance their stature in the world of medicine. They have nothing worthwhile to offer the world of medicine, so they push acupuncture, a procedure that even a child can see is fake.

Sep 28, 2010 7:06am EDT  --  Report as abuse
JasonBussell wrote:
McKenzie, your ignorance is showing. I have been practicing acupuncture for over 10 years. When I started, 50% of my job was defending my job. But that skepticism has sharply dropped off. You may not believe me nor the Chinese researchers, but what is your opinion of the Mayo Clinic? John Hopkins? The National Institute of Health, the World Health Organization, Duke Medical University, and the American Medical Association? Because they have all published papers concluding that acupuncture does work. It’s all about how the study is designed and reported. I could devise a study showing that aspirin is ineffective. I get 50 people with headaches, ask them to hold a bottle of aspirin for 5 minutes and then ask them if their headache is better.

There are two big problems with acupuncture research. First is that it is often done by MD’s or PhD researchers who are not very familiar with the practice (the above mentioned study showing acupuncture does not induce labor had patients receive needles in the points that we use to prevent labor). The second problem is that Chinese medicine treats everyone individually and you can’t do that within the strict confines of an RCT. RCT’s are great for pills, but cannot measure everything.

Your assertion that China is pushing its medicine on us is also incorrect. They forbade it from being taught to Westerners for a long time. It is us Westerners who are seeking out alternatives to our experimental drugs and risky surgeries. China has embraced and adopted Western medicine throughout its history. If acupuncture did not work, they would have abandoned it. Chairman Mao tried to get rid of it, but his Generals came back to him and implored him to keep it, because it was the most effective treatment for their troops.

If acupuncture works strictly on placebo (as some assert) then why don’t patients believe in all the other therapies they try before they come to me? And why does it work on animals (even skeptical animals).

Sep 28, 2010 3:50pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.