Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Devastated by Tornado

A huge tornado tears through an Oklahoma City suburb.  Slideshow 

Photo

Message of humility

A religious fraternity in Rio considers the election of Pope Francis, a confirmation of their beliefs in poverty and simplicity.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

McDonald's, U.S. say health insurance report false

Related Topics

DETROIT | Thu Sep 30, 2010 7:19pm EDT

DETROIT (Reuters) - McDonald's Corp and federal health officials denied on Thursday a newspaper report that the fast-food chain may drop health insurance for nearly 30,000 of its hourly workers.

The Wall Street Journal, citing a company memo, reported that McDonald's might cut the insurance unless U.S. regulators waived a requirement of new U.S. healthcare laws.

McDonald's officials called the report "completely false."

"This story is wrong," U.S. Department of Health and Human Services spokeswoman Jessica Santillo said in a statement. "The new law provides significant flexibility to maintain coverage for workers."

The fast-food restaurant chain is at odds over the new law's stipulation that so-called "mini-med" insurance plans spend at least 80 percent of premium revenue on medical care, the Wall Street Journal reported on its website on Wednesday.

That rule was designed to put limits on funds being used for marketing, executive salaries, and other nonmedical uses.

McDonald's told federal regulators in the memo that it would be "economically prohibitive" for its insurance carrier to continue to cover hourly workers unless it receives a waiver to the 80 percent minimum requirement, the newspaper reported. It said federal officials said there was no guarantee a waiver would be granted.

"This story is premature as guidance on the new medical loss ratio rules has not even been issued," Santillo said. "The administration is working closely with businesses like McDonald's that are committed to providing health benefits to protect health coverage for their employees."

"McDonald's is committed to providing competitive pay and benefits," Steve Russell, the company's head of human resources, said in a statement.

"We've had the opportunity to speak with regulatory agencies directly to better understand the implications of the law and to share our point of view," he said.

McDonald's did not disclose its current medical-loss ratio.

SMALL BENEFITS, SMALL MARKET

Federal regulators, McDonald's and the National Restaurant Association said they do not want U.S. workers to lose health coverage during the transition compliance with the new healthcare laws.

"This is one issue where I think we're on the same page," said Angelo Amador, the National Restaurant Association's vice president for labor and workforce policy.

McDonald's had about 14,000 U.S. restaurants in 2009. Most of the company's franchisees offer a limited-benefit plan and nearly 30,000 employees have chosen to be covered by the "mini-med" policies, Russell said.

Employees pay around $14 per week for a plan capping annual benefits at $2,000 per year, or a similar plan in which they pay $32 per week and annual benefits are capped at $10,000, according to the Wall Street Journal report.

Restaurants and retailers are more likely to offer such bare-boned plans because they have a high percentage of part-time and temporary workers and higher employee turnover than private sector employers overall.

The total market for limited benefit plans is about 1.4 million people, with Aetna Inc and Cigna Corp among the health insurers with the biggest presence, Wells Fargo analyst Peter Costa said in a research note.

Aetna's largest limited benefit customer is retailer Home Depot Inc with 24,000 of those members, said Costa, adding that limited benefit plans account for a small portion of the overall health insurance market.

(Reporting by Ben Klayman in Detroit, Lisa Baertlein in Los Angeles and Lewis Krauskopf in New York, editing by Dave Zimmerman)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (14)
JimInNevada wrote:
Exactly what you get when you have a public mandate without a public option.

Sep 29, 2010 9:51pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Majick1 wrote:
I presume McD is their own provider once the paper trail is complete.
The employees pay $728 a year for $2000 of coverage and $1664 a year for $10,000 total coverage. The insurance pays practically nothing and yet over 80% of the premiums go to administrative pockets.
It seems tome that if it weren’t for the government applying rules the insurance company would eventually be spending 100% of the premiums on themselves. Big business has shown again and again they can’t be ethical. Until business can treat consumers ethically it needs to be controlled by an entity that can protect the consumers.

Sep 29, 2010 10:38pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Robert76 wrote:
Hmmm, if McDonalds does not care to offer health insurance to it’s workers – even at the co-insurance cost it passes on – - how do we know that their food is safe and being prepared in a safe manner by a staff that is healthy.

Perhaps it is time to kick them to the curb.

Sep 29, 2010 10:47pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.