Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Best of Cannes

Style and scenes from the Cannes Film Festival.  Slideshow 

Photo

Ethiopia's salt trails

For centuries merchants have traveled to Ethiopia to collect salt from the surface of the vast desert basin.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

U.S. Postal Service loses bid to raise rates

Related Topics

WASHINGTON | Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:38pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. regulators on Thursday denied the beleaguered Postal Service an average 5.6 percent rate increase it had requested to help its financially ailing operations cope with the impact of the recession.

The Postal Service had proposed raising the price of a first-class stamp to 46 cents from 44 cents.

The Postal Regulatory Commission, the independent agency that oversees the mail service, said postal officials failed to demonstrate that the global recession was responsible for the agency's multibillion-dollar shortfalls.

"(A) commission analysis confirms that the Postal Service's cash flow problem is not a result of the recession and would have occurred whether or not the recession took place," the regulator said in a statement.

"It is the result of other, unrelated structural problems and the proposed ... rate adjustments would neither solve nor delay those problems."

An increase would have raised postal rates by about $3 billion beginning in January.

The Affordable Mail Alliance, a broad coalition of postal customers, welcomed the decision as a move that would contain mailing costs and encourage the Postal Service to undertake a fundamental restructuring of its networks.

The Postal Service, which delivers half the world's mail, is in the grips of a long-term decline in mail volume as increasing numbers of Americans communicate via email, pay their bills online and favor private carriers including FedExCorp and United Parcel Service.

It reported a $3.5 billion net loss for the fiscal third quarter last month and forecast a cash shortfall into 2011. That marked the 14th net loss in the past 16 quarters.

The commission also warned that the Postal Service may not be able to meet a statutory 10-year payment schedule, averaging around $5.5 billion a year, to create a fund to pay for future retiree health premiums.

"It has been unable to fund this obligation from operations and has instead used up all of its retained earnings and drawn down from its $15 billion borrowing authority," the commission statement said.

"Even with the requested increase, the Postal Service would be unable to meet this annual obligation either in 2011 or in succeeding years."

In addition to seeking higher rates, the Postal Service wants congressional approval to eliminate Saturday mail service to remain solvent.

The commission said the agency achieved more than $6 billion in cost reductions in 2009. As a result of its cost containment programs, work hours have declined faster than volumes in 2010.

(Reporting by David Morgan, editing by Maureen Bavdek)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (15)
ronchar wrote:
Those first class FLAG stamps they came out with probably accounted for a Billion dollars of the losses they claimed. About 60 pictures and master dies, along with double the amount of stamp paper for the same denomination stamp.

Sep 30, 2010 3:44pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Billium1953 wrote:
Just another failed government controlled entity. Just wait until your doctor reports to them…

Sep 30, 2010 4:21pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Paulie_D wrote:
I know this probably sounds too simple but,why doesn’t the PO scale back like every other business has to in lean times? Why do they just assume they can correct their mistakes but passing the cost onto the consumer?

A couple of good questions that Our Government should look into as well.

Sep 30, 2010 4:25pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.