European oil firms resist U.S. pressure to quit Iran

OSLO Fri Oct 1, 2010 1:28pm EDT

Related Topics

OSLO (Reuters) - European oil majors resisted pressure from the United States on Friday to stop doing business with Iran, in spite of Washington's drive to isolate Tehran over a nuclear program the West suspects is aimed at making bombs.

Total said it was still buying Iranian crude as it was not illegal under new U.N. sanctions, Statoil said it was providing Iran with technical assistance and ENI said it would exit Iran only when existing deals expire.

The United States had said on Thursday that all three, as well as Royal Dutch Shell, would abandon their Iranian activities voluntarily to avoid U.S. sanctions which can target foreign firms that do business with the Islamic state.

U.S. Deputy Secretary of State James Steinberg said on Thursday the companies "have provided assurances to us" that they have stopped or are in process of stopping activity in Iran and would not undertake new deals that may be sanctionable.

Iran sits on the world's second largest natural gas reserves after Russia and one of its largest proven reserves of oil, but Western energy companies have halted or scaled down their operations in the country due to the escalating nuclear dispute.

Tougher sanctions on Iran in recent months have raised the stakes for international oil firms while "also increasing the sense that the worsening of Iran's operational environment is irreversible", the IHS Global Insight consultancy said.

The former head of the U.N. nuclear watchdog's inspections worldwide said Iran was making "slow but steady" progress on its nuclear program and he believed there was still time to find a diplomatic solution to the standoff.

"They are making progress, but I think there is still time for a negotiated solution," Olli Heinonen, who quit in August and now teaches at Harvard University, told Reuters.

NUCLEAR CURB

Major powers hope new U.N., U.S. and European sanctions, imposed on Iran since June, will persuade it to enter serious negotiations on curbing its nuclear development.

Iran has repeatedly ruled out stopping nuclear enrichment and dismissed the impact of punitive measures, while leaving the door open for talks which may resume soon.

In a move partly intended to make it less vulnerable to sanctions, Iran plans to cut hefty food and fuel subsidies and a government official said in Tehran on Friday that gasoline prices will rise sharply in the coming weeks.

President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad wants to phase out $100 billion of subsidies, a policy economists say is a necessary but politically risky step.

In Tokyo, Trade Minister Akihiro Ohata said Japan's top oil explorer Inpex Corp may pull out of an oilfield project in Iran, a move that would see it join other global energy firms shunning the country.

A Total spokeswoman said the latest European sanctions "will keep to a minimum our activities" in Iran. But she said Total had not cut back its activities in the country since it said earlier this year it would halt the sale of refined products.

Statoil said it would conclude work in Iran by 2012 at the latest but was still providing technical assistance after finishing development of three phases of the South Pars natural gas project last year.

"Already in 2008 we said that we would not make further investments in Iran," spokesman Baard Glad Pedersen said.

Shell said it was complying with all legislation while declining to comment on its trading activities. Traders say it is still involved in Iranian crude purchases. "As you know, it is not illegal to lift oil from Iran," a Shell spokesman said.

(Additional reporting by Lionel Laurent in Paris and by Robin Pomeroy in Tehran; Writing and additional reporting by Fredrik Dahl in Vienna; Editing by Louise Ireland)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
zaida wrote:
SIMPLE – Start an online boycot of oil companies gas stations in the U.S. that deal with Iran.
The U.S. government should also make it VERY difficult to do exploration in the U.S.
Anyone out there have the savvy to start a boycott online & get it going?

Oct 01, 2010 11:35am EDT  --  Report as abuse
txgadfly wrote:
Why are we after Iran, but not after China, Pakistan, India, Israel and other third world countries that have nuclear weapons and are not especially friendly to the USA?

It sounds like we want to leave Iranian oil and gas to the Russians and the Chinese. Why?

Oct 01, 2010 2:47pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
jmjjmj1 wrote:
Lets see you just named all US allies and why are they treated differently…they are allies

Oct 01, 2010 5:32pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.