Housing pop is no bubble: Trulia CEO
At the Reuters Tech Summit, Trulia chief executive Pete Flint says private equity investors are starting to pull back from buying U.S. real estate, while overseas buyers are coming on strong once again. Video
Reuters Photojournalism
Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography. See more | Photo caption
The Afghan Army
The many faces of the Afghan National Army, which has taken over security of the country from NATO. Slideshow
Sponsored Links
Microsoft sues Motorola over Android phones
SEATTLE |
SEATTLE (Reuters) - Microsoft Corp sued Motorola Inc, alleging patent infringement on the handset maker's line of Android phones, in the latest development in a web of legal actions in the evolving smartphone business.
Microsoft, the world's largest software company, charged that former ally Motorola infringed nine of its patents in the Android-based smartphones, which run on software built by Google Inc.
Microsoft makes its own Windows phone software, which it charges handset makers to use in their phones. Motorola, like some rivals, has shifted toward Google's free Android as a more attractive option, straining the relationship between the two companies.
The suits come 10 days before Microsoft launches the new version of its mobile software, which it hopes will win back market share from Apple Inc's iPhone and Google.
The patents in question relate to synchronizing e-mail, calendars and contacts, scheduling meetings and notifying applications of changes in signal strength and battery power, Microsoft said in a statement.
A Motorola spokeswoman said the company has not yet received a copy of the suit, but based on its strong intellectual property portfolio, plans to "vigorously defend itself."
Google said it was disappointed in Microsoft's move, which it claimed would threaten innovation in the sector. "While we are not a party to this lawsuit, we stand behind the Android platform and the partners who have helped us to develop it," the company said in an e-mailed statement.
The suit is the latest in a complicated series of legal actions between various phone makers and software firms over who owns patents to the technology used in smartphones, kicked off by Nokia suing Apple last year, and Apple subsequently suing handset maker HTC Corp. Oracle Corp has also sued Google over Android software.
"Our action today merely seeks to ensure respect for our intellectual property rights infringed by Android devices," said Horacio Gutierrez, deputy general counsel in charge of Microsoft's intellectual property, in a blog post on the company's website. "Judging by the recent actions by Apple and Oracle, we are not alone in this respect."
Microsoft said it filed its actions against Motorola at the International Trade Commission and in federal court in Seattle.
The case is 2:10-cv-01577 Microsoft Corporation v. Motorola Inc, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington.
(Reporting by Bill Rigby; Editing by Robert MacMillan, Gerald E. McCormick, Richard Chang and Gunna Dickson)
- Tweet this
- Link this
- Share this
- Digg this
- Reprints
There is a concept in patent law that requires the utility, uniqueness and lack of obviousness of an idea be considered before a patent is issued, but it seems today that nothing is considered obvious, and virtually anything is considered unique and useful. At some point Microsoft, Apple, Sun Microsystems, etc. are going to have to realize that running down to the patent office every time someone has some totally obvious idea (like, how about we let people move their contacts, emails and appointments, to/from their computer and mobile phone) that doesn’t mean it deserves a patent. Much of what I see patented today are ideas that a host of people already have thought of, but didn’t think to patent because they just thought it was obvious.
Apple is 10 times worse about suing everyone than Microsoft. Look up Apple lawsuits and you will see Apple loves to sue for patent infringement, but has yet to pay up to other companies for using other’s technology. They are one of the worst companies for not working well with others, and gouging their consumers.





Follow Reuters