U.S. Democrats see signs of hope for election

Fri Oct 1, 2010 12:17pm EDT

Related Topics

* Democrats heartened by upticks in key races, indicators

* U.S. congressional elections set for Nov. 2

* Economic argument, turnout a key to election outcome

By John Whitesides

WASHINGTON, Oct 1 (Reuters) - After enduring months of bad news and gloomy political forecasts, some U.S. Democrats are seeing signs of hope that Republican gains in the Nov. 2 congressional elections will not be as big as predicted.

A modest boost in the party's national poll numbers and an upturn for Democratic candidates in a few key states, particularly California and Washington, have fueled Democratic hopes that a yearlong Republican wave of momentum may have crested.

Several recent opinion polls also show a slight erosion in the huge Republican edge in enthusiasm for voting as President Barack Obama turns up his attacks on Republican economic policies while core Democrats begin to engage in the campaign.

The shifts offer Democrats a flicker of hope that a long-predicted Republican congressional landslide might not be big enough for Republicans to claim a majority in the U.S. House of Representatives or Senate.

Pollsters said the movement could be a natural tightening in the final weeks of a fierce campaign. Little has changed in the overall political atmosphere. Voters are still deeply unhappy about the economy and Obama's approval ratings are still stuck in the mid-40s.

"We saw a crest for Republicans in late August and early September when Democrats were at their absolute nadir," said Ipsos Public Affairs pollster Chris Jackson. "Now it's shifting to a more natural situation where Republicans make gains but maybe not the overwhelming wave forecast a month ago."

Democrats have struggled against a political headwind all year, with voters in a foul mood over persistent high unemployment, a growing budget deficit and the perceived failures of government in Washington.

The deteriorating political climate has put Democrats on the defensive in dozens of once-safe House and Senate seats and sparked widespread predictions that Republicans would pick up the 39 House seats and perhaps even the 10 Senate seats they need to take control of Congress and block Obama's agenda.

Republicans promise to cut spending, repeal the healthcare overhaul and shrink government if they take control of Congress. Obama has drawn a sharper economic contrast with Republicans in recent weeks by arguing that they would bring back the failed economic policies of President George W. Bush.

Obama also has focused more on cranking up Democratic enthusiasm, hitting the campaign trail this week to try to convince young people of the stakes in November.


"The key for the Democrats in the final month is to do two things -- win the economic argument and turn out their voters," said Simon Rosenberg, head of the Democratic advocacy group NDN. "If they do that, they will end up in a better place on Election Day than anybody would have thought two months ago."

Some recent polls show slight gains for the party on voter preferences for Congress and voter enthusiasm, although most still show Democrats behind in both. In a NBC/Wall Street Journal poll this week, Republicans led by 3 percentage points when voters were asked which party they preferred in the congressional elections, down from a 9-point lead last month.

A Reuters/Ipsos poll in Ohio showed Democrats closing the enthusiasm gap on Republicans, with 79 percent of Democrats saying this month they were certain to vote compared to 67 percent in August. Republican enthusiasm was largely unchanged, with 91 percent certain to vote.

The same poll and others showed Democrat Ted Strickland wiping out Republican rival John Kasich's big lead in the Ohio governor's race.

In California and Washington state, several polls show Democratic Senators Barbara Boxer and Patty Murray opening significant leads in once-tight races against Republican challengers as traditional Democratic voters tune in the election.

"I think we are seeing some Democrats come home," said Karlyn Bowman, a poll analyst at the American Enterprise Institute. "I always thought the enthusiasm gap would close as we got closer to the voting, but it can only close so much. The party that is out of power is always going to be more enthusiastic."

But many of the Democratic gains in individual races have been offset by a Republican surge in other states. In the Connecticut Senate race, Republican Linda McMahon has wiped out most of Democrat Richard Blumenthal's once-big lead in polls.

In West Virginia, popular Democratic Governor Joe Manchin trails Republican John Raese in several new polls after holding a big early lead in their Senate race.

The uncertainty of the size and composition of voter turnout has complicated the polling. Few analysts can predict how many of the millions of first-time voters who turned out in 2008, drawn by Obama's candidacy, will return to the polls, or how the enthusiasm of conservative Tea Party activists will impact Republican voting.

"Many polls may have underestimated the intensity and turnout on Nov. 2, which I believe will favor Republicans," said Senator John Cornyn, head of the Republican Senate campaign committee.

The party in the White House typically loses seats in congressional elections two years after a new president takes power, and Democrats acknowledge they still face big losses in November.

But they have more room for improvement than Republicans -- particularly since polls show public approval ratings for congressional Republicans are no better than for Democrats.

"We can win some of these close seats because Republicans have not sealed the deal with voters," Democratic strategist Chris Kofinis said.

"The question is whether we can move from a disastrous year to a normal mid-term election year, or even something in between? Given the volatility in the electorate, that is possible," he said. "We still have an opportunity to minimize our losses, and have a better than expected outcome."

(Editing by Alistair Bell and Will Dunham)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (10)
burf wrote:
This election isn’t a referendum on Obama, his policies, or the Dems… it’s a referendum on just how ignorant the Electorate is.
Do they vote for the Party that destroyed the economy? Do they vote for the Party, that when faced with severe National problems (economic & otherwise), chose to do nothing, rather than work with the Dems to help the People?
Instead of doing their duty, to work for the People, they chose to work for The Party.
So, we’ll see on Nov 2, if the American Electorate is as dumb & ignorant, as the GOP hope they are.

Oct 01, 2010 1:06pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
capnkrk wrote:
Oh, ‘work for the people’ like ramrodding Obamacare thru with 60% of the people opposed? Now thats voting with your constituents. Thanks, but I’ll be ignorant and toss out the socialists and redistributors.

Oct 01, 2010 1:20pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
meBrian wrote:
Thinking that this election is about anything but this administration’s inability to do what it promised (with absolute power in Congress) means you are choosing to bury your head in the sand. Regardless of whose fault it was years ago, this is about right now. People don’t need government for help yet the government wants to keep shoving policy down their throats. And if you believe that either party doesn’t have their own interests at heart, than I would call that ignorant.

Oct 01, 2010 1:21pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.