U.S. views sought in Iraqi contractor torture case

Related Topics

WASHINGTON | Mon Oct 4, 2010 10:42am EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Supreme Court on Monday asked the U.S. government for its views about a lawsuit claiming that employees of two defense contractors took part in the torture and abuse of Iraqis at the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq.

A group of Iraqis appealed to the high court seeking to reinstate their lawsuit against CACI International Inc, which provided interrogators at Abu Ghraib, and L-3 Communications Holdings Inc's Titan unit, which provided interpreters to the U.S. military.

The lawsuit was filed in 2004 on behalf of the Iraqis who say they or their relatives had been tortured or mistreated while detained by the U.S. military at the Abu Ghraib prison outside Baghdad. They said contractor employees participated in the abuse, a claim denied by the companies.

A federal appeals court dismissed the lawsuit because the companies had immunity as government contractors. It also said the suit was pre-empted by U.S. national security and foreign policy law.

In appealing to the Supreme Court, attorneys for the Iraqis argued that victims of torture may proceed with lawsuits against private parties, and that corporations can be held liable for torture under international law.

But attorneys for CACI and L-3 opposed the appeal, said the appeals court's rejection of the claims was correct, and argued that further review of the case by the Supreme Court was unwarranted.

On the first day of its new term, the Supreme Court issued a brief order asking the Justice Department to file a brief in the case expressing the views of the U.S. government.

(Editing by Will Dunham)

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
Arafel wrote:
I think that everyone, including corporations need to bear responsibility for their actions. Does this question need to be more complicated than that?

Oct 04, 2010 12:03pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
waltinseattle wrote:
It a just world it would be that simple. But then what would become of the Divine Rights of Governments and their minions , which can trace itself back way before the enlightenment, nay, even before the English reformation,…(with a cynics grin I say this)

Oct 04, 2010 2:51pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
wildoaklane wrote:
Corporations only have a responsibility to their share holders to make a profit. Hence these corporations have a responsibility to lobby, and use any other means of influence, like their newly-given-by-the-Supreme-Court right to purchase elected officials, to direct our government away from any punitive damages for themselves.

Oct 04, 2010 5:12pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.