Analysis: Abbas has few options as Mideast talks founder

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas sits before the start of a meeting with senior Fatah and PLO leaders in the West Bank city of Ramallah October 2, 2010. REUTERS/Mohamad Torokman

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas sits before the start of a meeting with senior Fatah and PLO leaders in the West Bank city of Ramallah October 2, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Mohamad Torokman

RAMALLAH, West Bank | Mon Oct 11, 2010 12:46pm EDT

RAMALLAH, West Bank (Reuters) - A Palestinian threat of unilateral steps toward the creation of their own state if peace talks with Israel fail has little chance of success because it is unlikely to receive international support.

For President Mahmoud Abbas, peace talks remain the preferred path toward statehood, even as negotiations founder and doubts mount over whether they will ever bring about a state of Palestine on occupied land next to Israel.

Abbas has given Washington a month to deliver a new freeze on Israeli settlement building in the occupied West Bank so that peace talks can continue. Chief Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat said on Sunday that a settlement freeze and a continuation of talks were Abbas's preferred path.

Failing that, the Palestinians would seek U.S. and U.N. support for the creation of a Palestinian state, he said.

Those ideas were "wishful thinking," said Zakaria al-Qaq, a Palestinian political commentator. "The proposals that we heard are very disappointing, are indicative of complete impotence and a sign that the cupboard of options is now completely bare."

The idea of going to the Security Council last emerged almost a year ago but quickly faded from the headlines.

At the time, it drew an immediate warning from Israel that only bilateral talks could yield peace. The United States, which wields a veto in the Security Council, responded that the best way to achieve a Palestinian state was through negotiations.

French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner, speaking during a visit to Jericho on Monday, said he would not support Security Council action if it undermined the peace process.

Palestinian commentators say ideas floated by Abbas during an Arab League meeting are a sign of his weakness.

His strategy continues to based on a hope that U.S. pressure on Israel will bring about a peace deal acceptable to the Palestinians, producing a state in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip with East Jerusalem as its capital.

"BETTING ON NEGOTIATIONS"

"Abbas is still betting on negotiations: that America will succeed," said Hany al-Masri, a Palestinian analyst.

"It's good they are thinking about alternatives, but these are not the alternatives that will work," he said.

Violence is a non-starter for the 75-year-old Abbas, head of the Ramallah-based Palestinian Authority. He is a strong critic of the Intifada, or uprising, that erupted when peace talks collapsed a decade ago.

Abbas is scornful of the "armed resistance" of his rivals in the Hamas group which governs Gaza. Hamas, in turn, has gained political ground on Abbas and his Western-backed Palestinian Authority (PA) due to the peace process's failure to deliver.

Yet Abbas firmly believes that the process he helped to create remains the Palestinians' best hope for statehood.

A new round of U.S.-backed peace talks got underway on September 2 in Washington but were called off by the Palestinians just a few weeks later following the expiry of an Israeli moratorium on new home building in West Bank settlements.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has so far resisted pressure to renew the freeze. He heads a government dominated by parties which support the settlers, including his own Likud.

The Palestinians fear the growth of the settlements will render impossible the creation of a viable Palestinian state, killing off the peace process once and for all.

Abbas, briefing Arab officials on his options were the peace process to collapse, also raised the specter of dissolving the PA, said an official who attended the briefing.

The PA, created as part of the peace process, depends on aid from Arab and Western states. It governs islands of territory in the West Bank, surrounded by zones of Israeli control, and employs close to 150,000 people.

The official said Abbas questioned what the role of the PA would be were the prospects of a Palestinian state to fade completely. Palestinian critics of the peace process have long called for the PA's dissolution, arguing that it relieves Israel of obligations it should perform as occupying power. But too many people, many of them Palestinian, have an interest in the its survival, Masri said. "I do not believe the PA is serious about dissolving itself," he said.

(Additional reporting by Mohammed Assadi in Jericho; Editing by Samia Nakhoul)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
Brumby wrote:
If the International Community and the U.S. want the situation resolved cut off the supply lines to Israel until they negotiate honestly and in concurrence with international law.

Oct 11, 2010 10:54am EDT  --  Report as abuse
todonada wrote:
If the International Community (of which the US is a member) don’t resolve the situation (ie the Abbas approach fails) then they will be handing the baton to Hamas and others with a less peaceful approach to things.

Israel may like to gamble on this outcome but I seriously doubt that it is in their best interests to do so.

Meanwhile Israel continues to resist the clearly stated wishes of the International Community and the International Community does not follow through on what they have said, the situation will go from bad to worse.

Oct 11, 2010 11:24am EDT  --  Report as abuse
paintcan wrote:
It seems very strange that the “international community” would not recognize a Palestinian state in as much as they are already paying most of the bills for the West Bank and Gaza now and have been for decades, via the UN. The Israeli government has not been noticeably generous or even fair in dealing with the occupied territories – have decades of international condemnations, recorded with the UN, for their neglect of their obligations as an occupying power, and have invested in the territories only when it benefits their own.

I think the Israeli’s are determined to foreclose on the West Bank, evict the tenants and rent or sell it at a discount for their own fanatical underclass. It is a move based on the racist assumption that the Palestinians are “only Arabs and don’t belong there”. It would be too expensive to the state of Israel to recognize that the residents of the West Bank have legitimate rights.

And somehow we are supposed to believe that Jehovah will smile from his new box on the Temple Mount – after the Dome of the Rock has been demolished of course – as an obscene palace to a god that encouraged theft, murder, human sacrifice and territorial aggrandizement – all at bargain prices.

It seems you get away with any crime if you know how to play your God right, or can try to claim that you are. Is it any wonder that idea is so attractive to the rest of the region? You have to have a very strong stomach, or a very selective conscience, to love “that old time religion”.

Oct 11, 2010 11:26am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.