Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Weird homes

Home is where the heart is, no matter what unusual form that home may take.  Slideshow 

Photo

The drone wars

The frontlines of America's covert drone program.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Obama administration appeals gay marriage ruling

WASHINGTON | Tue Oct 12, 2010 7:06pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Obama administration decided on Tuesday to appeal a judge's rulings that prevented the U.S. government from banning same-sex marriages, a move that could undermine support among President Barack Obama's traditional liberal base ahead of a key election.

The Obama administration filed a notice of appeal with the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts in support of the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act, or DOMA, that barred gay marriages, even though Obama had previously opposed the law.

Although Obama opposes the law, a Justice Department spokeswoman said that the administration was defending the statute because it was obligated to defend federal laws when challenged in court.

"As a policy matter, the President has made clear that he believes DOMA is discriminatory and should be repealed," said Justice Department spokeswoman Tracy Schmaler. "The Justice Department is defending the statute, as it traditionally does when acts of Congress are challenged."

The rulings being appealed by the government were made in July by U.S. District Judge Joseph Tauro in Boston who found the law violated the U.S. Constitution's 10th Amendment, which protects states' rights, and the clause granting equal protection under the law.

Under his rulings, same-sex couples would be entitled to the same federal spousal benefits and protections that are afforded to heterosexual married couples.

One of the challenges was brought by the state of Massachusetts and the other by several couples, including an employee of the U.S. Postal Service, Nancy Gill, who could not obtain coverage for her wife, Marcelle Letourneau, on her family health and vision plans.

The appeal comes at a tough time for Obama, who has been trying to shore up his liberal base ahead of the contentious congressional elections when his fellow Democrats are expected to lose many seats to Republicans. Democrats could lose control of the House of Representatives.

A key concern has been whether those who have supported Obama in the past will show up to vote in the November 2 midterm elections. He has opposed same-sex marriages but supported civil unions and extended some benefits to gay partners of federal employees.

Gay rights activists have argued that the legal battle is one for equal rights while their opponents, including religious conservatives, have argued same-sex marriages are a threat to the traditional family.

Massachusetts was the first state to legalize same-sex marriages and has been followed by a handful of other states. The state attorney general, Martha Coakley, said they would defend the district court ruling at the appeals court.

"DOMA is an unjust, unfair and unconstitutional law that discriminates against Massachusetts married couples and their families," she said in a statement.

A lawyer for the Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders (GLAD) organization, which represented Gill in the challenge, said they are confident in the strength of their case.

"DOMA brings harm to families like our plaintiffs every day, denying married couples and their children basic protections like health insurance, pensions, and Social Security benefits," Mary Bonauto, GLAD's Civil Rights project director, said in a statement.

(Additional reporting by Ros Krasny in Boston, editing by Bill Trott and Sandra Maler)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (70)
Goodwolf wrote:
I will certainly show up to vote next month — but in two years, I will show up to vote for someone other than Obama, who has turned his back again and again on his glbt constituency.

Oct 12, 2010 5:56pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Eideard wrote:
Obama – unfortunately – prefers to act like just another Democrat. No backbone.

Oct 12, 2010 8:01pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
kentosio wrote:
The Obama administration is NOT required to appeal this ruling. They traditionally do for federal laws but they are not required to. And quite honestly, it’s rather hypocritical of his administration to do this, and sugarcoating it by using the word “traditional” to make it sound like there’s no contradiction is just plain slimy. I don’t even support gay marriage myself, but this lying to one’s constituents and making false promises isn’t ethical.

Oct 12, 2010 8:04pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.