Many obese people see no need to lose weight

NEW YORK Wed Oct 13, 2010 4:37pm EDT

Related Topics

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - A substantial proportion of obese people don't think they're too fat, new research shows.

Among more than 2,000 obese Dallas County residents surveyed in 2000-2002, 14 percent of African Americans and 11 percent of Hispanics -- but just 2 percent of whites -- believed that they needed to lose weight, Dr. Tiffany M. Powell of the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas and her colleagues found.

People who misperceived their body size were happier with their health, and felt healthier, than those who did recognize their obesity; they were also more likely to think they were at low risk of developing high blood pressure or diabetes or having a heart attack during their lifetimes. In fact, two-thirds of people with body size misperception thought they were at low risk of becoming obese.

The study "points to really a lack of understanding about the effects of obesity," Powell told Reuters Health. At the same time, she added, "you walk a fine line, because you don't want people to necessarily have an unhealthy body image, but you also want people to understand that they need to lose weight."

Powell and her colleagues investigated body size misperception among 2,056 men and women participating in the Dallas Heart Study. All were obese, meaning that they had a body mass index (BMI; a measure of weight in relation to height used to gauge obesity) of 30 or greater. For a woman 5 feet 5 inches tall, this translates to weighing at least 180 pounds; for a 6-foot-tall man, this would mean weighing at least 221 pounds.

The researchers gauged study participants' body perception by having them look at a series of nine figures in a row, from very thin to very obese, and asking them first to choose their ideal figure, and then to choose the figure that looked like them. People who chose ideal body sizes that were the same or bigger than their actual body size were classified as misperceiving their body size.

Eight percent of the study participants overall did not consider themselves to be obese. More educated people or those with higher incomes were no more likely to perceive their weight accurately than less-educated people or those who made less money, the researchers found.

But there were major differences in how people with body size misperception saw their own health risks, even though their actual health risks -- for example, whether or not they had high blood pressure -- were no different from people with accurate perception of their body size. For example, half thought they were healthier than most people their age, compared to a third of people who perceived their weight accurately.

Forty-four percent had not seen a doctor at all in the past year, compared to a quarter of those who accurately gauged their weight. When the "misperceivers" did see a health care provider, they were less likely to discuss their diet, physical activity level, or whether they needed to lose weight.

Based on the findings, Powell said, physicians may want to take a step back before discussing lifestyle habits with their obese patients, and asking them first about how they perceive their weight and whether or not they think they need to lose weight. The fact that many of these people may not see a doctor at all also makes it important to reach out to them in the community, she added, for example at church health fairs.

It's possible, according to Powell, that heavy people's self-perceptions are changing because overweight and obesity are becoming so much more common. "There is this tendency that if everyone around you looks a certain way, you either want to look that way or you're comfortable looking the way you are," Powell said.

SOURCE: Archives of Internal Medicine, October 11, 2010.

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (2)
I suspect the study didn’t take into consideration lifelong obesity vs. cyclical obesity over a lifetime. Those fat over a lifetime have nothing to base a healthy imagine on. For example, I was too skinny (6′ with 29″ waist) in my teens, so I got into bodybuilding. All the supplements caused me to gain “good” weight (read “visually appealing” weight) until I hit age 30, after which I kept gaining weight (even though I did not change my eating of the “health food” and quasi “vegetarian” steam veggies and fresh fish menu). My weight reached a crescendo with a big fat 44″ waist in the 1990’s; requiring drastic food “management” (one doesn’t put anything in their mouth unless it serves a purpose and is 100% nutritious). Losing 50 lbs and over 6 inches, I’m descending into the butter zone again. If I was fat my entire lifetime, I might think this was “normal” and have no desire to change. Whereas I knew how good I felt when thin, what’s “too thin” and what’s “too fat,” and I became very familiar with nutrition, and so I can gauge my diet accordingly. I feel sad for those who have no basis of comparison!

Oct 13, 2010 8:40pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
mwayland wrote:
Tiffany Powell needs to realise (as many economists are now realising) that people are not driven by logic. You will never change people by simply giving them good reasons to do so.

Sales and marketing people now realise that buying decisions can no longer be influenced soley by repeated exposure to the same content.

It is the Dallas County people’s beliefs and “irrational” perceptions that maintain their BMI status quo. To call them “misperceptions” is an academic arrogance in the extreme.

To these Texans their perception is their reality and probably the reason diets don’t work for them. The diets don’t address the emotional hard wired aspects of their psychology.

Oct 13, 2010 10:27pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.