Mozilo settles Countrywide fraud case at $67.5 million


Former Countrywide Financial Corporation Chief Executive Angelo Mozilo is sworn in to testify on Capitol Hill, March 7, 2008. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

Former Countrywide Financial Corporation Chief Executive Angelo Mozilo is sworn in to testify on Capitol Hill, March 7, 2008.

Credit: Reuters/Kevin Lamarque

Related Topics

LOS ANGELES/SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - Former Countrywide chief Angelo Mozilo agreed to a settlement of $67.5 million to resolve charges of duping the home lender's investors while lining his own pockets, but Bank of America Corp will pick up two-thirds of the tab.

The flamboyant poster boy of the subprime mortgage market's boom and bust struck a last-minute deal with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission before his trial on civil fraud charges was to start next week.

The most prominent executive charged by regulators with wrongdoing linked to the housing market collapse, Mozilo on Friday became the recipient of the highest fine ever dished out to an executive of a public corporation.

Some would argue Mozilo -- accused of hiding risks in Countrywide's portfolio, then selling off stock before it became public -- is getting off lightly, amid outrage over the financial industry's role in bringing about the crisis.

In July, Goldman Sachs agreed to pay $550 million to settle charges related to how it marketed a subprime mortgage product. At the same time, the SEC has been under fire for how it handled probes into Ponzi-schemers Allen Stanford and Bernard Madoff.

Mozilo settled without admitting or denying any wrongdoing. Bank of America, which bought Countrywide in 2008, said it will advance $45 million to Mozilo for the settlement, as required by indemnification provisions.

"He's got a nice pile of cash and he can live the rest of his life, assuming he's not indicted, pretty well," said Michael Perlis, a former SEC attorney.

Robert Khuzami, director of enforcement at the SEC, pointed out that a $22.5 million civil penalty will still come out of Mozilo's pocket. But state law permits companies to indemnify corporate officers in different circumstances, he said.

"We have in the past attempted to challenge that," Khuzami said, adding that those efforts had failed.


The SEC brought the fraud case in June 2009. Mozilo and two other former executives were accused of failing to disclose the true state of Countrywide's deteriorating mortgage portfolio. Regulators also contend Mozilo made nearly $140 million by dumping Countrywide stock before the truth emerged.

In 2007, Mozilo took in $121.5 million from exercising stock options and was awarded another $22.1 million of compensation, according to the industry-backed Leaders of the Center on Executive Compensation.

Former Countrywide President David Sambol and Chief Financial Officer Eric Sieracki also settled charges Friday.

Mozilo's attorneys were not available for comment. The $45 million disgorgement relates to gains from Mozilo's sales of Countrywide stock.

The son of a Bronx butcher who embodied a rags-to-riches success story, Mozilo became the burned face of the mortgage meltdown when the subprime crisis surfaced in 2007.

The former Countrywide CEO also faces potential criminal charges, but that investigation had taken a back seat to the SEC case. Mozilo, Sambol and Sieracki all elected to answer pre-trial questions from SEC lawyers about their conduct, instead of invoking their Fifth Amendment right to remain silent.

Some legal observers say this indicates Mozilo's camp did not think there was a high likelihood of criminal indictment.

At the height of its success in 2006, Calabasas, California-based Countrywide originated $461 billion worth of loans -- close to $41 billion of which were subprime.

But subprime mortgages ultimately poisoned the U.S. mortgage market. As Countrywide buckled under the weight of defaults and foreclosures, its own lenders curtailed credit.

Bank of America bought Countrywide for $2.5 billion in 2008, less than 10 percent of what the company was worth in early 2007.

The settlements, announced in Los Angeles federal court, resolve SEC charges that Mozilo, Sambol and Sieracki hid the risks of the company's teetering mortgage portfolio as the real estate market soured.

Mozilo, who was 70 when the SEC brought the charges in June 2009, agreed that he would not serve as an executive or director at a publicly traded company, according to court documents. The SEC said that is a permanent ban.

"In my view the proposed settlement is very reasonable in light of the significant hurdles that both sides would have faced in proving their case at trial," U.S. District Judge John Walter said in court on Friday.

Like Mozilo, Sambol and Sieracki neither admitted nor denied guilt and did not appear at the court hearing.

Sambol agreed to pay a $520,000 civil penalty, and to disgorge $5 million, according to court documents. Bank of America will cover Sambol's disgorgement too.

Sieracki will pay a $130,000 civil penalty.

The SEC generally seeks civil penalties to match any disgorgement amount, said former federal prosecutor Michael Shepard, who is not involved in the SEC case. But the defense lawyers were able to avoid that in the Countrywide case.

"The art of the deal is convincing them to get off the number they started at, and on to a much better number," Shepard said.

(Additional reporting by Joe Rauch and Rachelle Younglai; Writing by Dan Levine and Martha Graybow; Editing by Edwin Chan, Editing by Phil Berlowitz, Gerald E. McCormick, Gary Hill)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (13)
xyz2055 wrote:
“All three defendants settled without admitting or denying and wrongdoing”. Is that kind of like a secret handshake or something. No one with half a brain settles for $68M unless they believe there is a strong enough case that they will be found guilty and it will cost them a lot more. And it shows a glimpse of how deep Mozilo’s pockets got from those shady deals. He must have tons more money to settle for $68M.

Oct 15, 2010 2:48pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
annie0107 wrote:
To: xyz2055

I could not have said it any better … I just cannot figure why prosecuting the shady dealers like Mozilo and his ilk are not part of our national/state/local debates.

Oct 15, 2010 2:59pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
missudpat wrote:
“Friends of Mozilo” probably brokered the deal behind the scenes. Jurisprudence at its best. Try to see the next bigger scandal.

Oct 15, 2010 3:29pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.