U.S. Army Captain Michael Kelvington, commander of the Battle company, 1-508 Parachute Infantry battalion, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, bows next to remains of Gulam Dostager, a member of Afghan Local Police who was killed in the blast of an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) during the joint Tor Janda (Black Flag in Pashtu) operation, in Zahri district of Kandahar province, southern Afghanistan May 25, 2012.  REUTERS/Shamil Zhumatov  (AFGHANISTAN - Tags: MILITARY CIVIL UNREST CONFLICT TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Members of the U.S. Navy Blue Angels fly over the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan as part of the 25th annual Fleet Week celebration in New York, May 23, 2012.  REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz (UNITED STATES - Tags: MILITARY ANNIVERSARY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Fleet Week

The U.S. Navy takes Manhattan for a week.  Slideshow 

Photo

The SpaceX mission

A privately owned unmanned rocket blasts off on a mission to be the first commercial flight to the International Space Station.  Slideshow 

Canada's privacy watchdog bites Google

Related News

Related Topics

The Google Inc logo is projected on a screen during the unveiling of ''Google Instant'' at a news conference in San Francisco, California September 8, 2010. REUTERS/Robert Galbraith

The Google Inc logo is projected on a screen during the unveiling of ''Google Instant'' at a news conference in San Francisco, California September 8, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Robert Galbraith

VANCOUVER | Tue Oct 19, 2010 3:13pm EDT

VANCOUVER (Reuters) - Canada's privacy watchdog accused Google Inc on Tuesday of violating the rights of thousands of Canadians by inappropriately collecting their personal information in building its Street View service.

Google must tighten its privacy protection systems to prevent a repeat of the incident, blamed on a careless software engineer, and should get rid of the data it accidentally collected, Privacy Commissioner Jennifer Stoddart said.

"Our investigation shows that Google did capture personal information -- and, in some cases, highly sensitive personal information such as complete emails. This incident was a serious violation of Canadians' privacy rights," Stoddart said in a news release.

Google has found itself in the cross-hairs of privacy officials in several countries since it acknowledged in May that the fleet of cars used to take images for Street View were also collecting personal information from unsecured home wireless networks as they drove by.

Google officials said they were unaware that the computer code that allowed the "payload data" to be collected was in the Street View software when it was installed in cars, Stoddart said. The software took pictures of panoramic street-level scenes for Google's mapping service.

"This incident was the result of a careless error -- one that could easily have been avoided," the commissioner aid.

Stoddart set a February 1, 2011, deadline for Google to show it has followed her recommendations. She does not have the authority to fine the company, but can take her complaints to Federal Court.

GOOGLE APOLOGIZES

Google said on Tuesday it was "profoundly sorry for having mistakenly collected payload data," but it did not specify what steps it would take.

"We have been working with the Office of the Privacy Commissioner in its investigation and will continue to answer the commissioner's questions and concerns," the company said in a statement.

Analysts downplayed the impact of the announcement on the search engine giant.

"Google was a vacuum cleaner and sucked up information they hadn't really thought through and didn't have a use for anyway," said Iain Grant at telecom consultancy SeaBoard Group. He added that Google would likely agree to delete the payload data.

Stoddart's Google complaint comes as her office is airing renewed concerns about allegations the social network site Facebook has failed to protect user's personal data from being transferred to third parties, such as game developers.

The commission wants to make sure those third parties are complying with Canada's privacy laws, a spokeswoman said.

"We're upset briefly and then life goes on," said Queen's University law professor Art Cockfield. "As long as there is no real sanction to the goodwill of the company that is reflected in loss of future profits they won't change their behavior."

SeaBoard's Grant said the privacy commissioner's more aggressive stance with Google and Facebook is a positive move and that he expected Stoddart to seek to further educate Canadians about privacy issues related to voluntary disclosure of location.

"The next big thing for privacy is probably location-based services," he said, referring to social networking sites that encourage users to share information about where they are and what they are doing.

Stoddart said that Canadian investigators who looked at a sample of the data collected by Google said it included complete emails, email addresses and phone numbers, but that it was not possible to know how much information was collected.

(Additional reporting by Alastair Sharp; editing by Rob Wilson and Peter Galloway)

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
Sapereaud33 wrote:
So if I paint my Social Security number on the side of my house and google takes a picture of it can I sue them? Or if I say it on the radio and somebody records it can I get rich quick? I propose that the transmission of sensitive data over an unsecured wireless network is just as much of a willful act considering the fact that every modern operating system warns of the dangers of open networks upon connection. These people literally broadcast their information on the airwaves, it would be improper for google to use it for monetary gain but its collection was as innocent as overhearing a conversation between two people communicating with megaphones.

Oct 19, 2010 6:43pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
SunnySun wrote:
So did Google charge anything when you use their services? They get the info by accident and have not use them yet. Why and how do you fine them? If a person passing by your house looks into your open window you would sue the person?

Oct 19, 2010 10:08pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Talleyrand wrote:
To the two supporters of google’s actions here: Actually, privacy is one of the greatest issues facing us and collecting data is not a good idea. In a recent interview, one of the Google bosses (I can’t remember which one, but I think it was on Colbert) noted intelligently that the Internet doesn’t forget anything.

For about 12 years, I was a freelance travel photographer and writer. This was well before Google. I was once warned by and agency head: do not photogarph private property, and do not photograph a view/site while standing on private property. Both prohibitions make total sense. Now, why is it that Google is allowed to collect, collect, collect data??? Why are they doing it? Why have they GIVEN their services?? Charity? A good heart? Generosity?

If you believe that, then you belileve in Santa Claus still.

Data = power = money

Period.

Oct 20, 2010 3:58am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.