Outdoor smoking ban plan angers some New Yorkers

NEW YORK Wed Oct 20, 2010 10:41am EDT

A stock trader smokes a cigarette outside the New York Stock Exchange, May 20, 2010. REUTERS/Brendan McDermid

A stock trader smokes a cigarette outside the New York Stock Exchange, May 20, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Brendan McDermid

Related News

Related Topics

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Finding a place to smoke could get even harder in New York City.

Mayor Michael Bloomberg wants to expand his ban on smoking in restaurants and bars to parks, beaches, boardwalks, pedestrian plazas and other outdoor public spaces.

Some smokers say it is another unwelcome case of government telling people how to behave.

Bloomberg has already banned trans fats in restaurants, and wants to bar the purchase of sugary drinks with food stamps to fight obesity. In another step to encourage healthy living, he has moved to reduce salt in restaurant food.

"Smoking a cigarette is a legal behavior. It's not the government's role to dictate or force anyone to not do it," said Audrey Silk, director of New York City Citizens Lobbying Against Smoker Harassment.

"Eventually they will ban smoking everywhere, even in people's homes," she said.

But while the 2003 ban on smoking in bars and restaurants generated howls of protests, the law has since become widely accepted. The city council is likely to approve a ban on smoking in public outdoor spaces, although a date for a vote has not been set.

Bloomberg, who took office in 2002, has also used the council's power to promote other health measures, including a ban on trans fats in restaurant food and a requirement chain restaurants display calorie counts on menus.

He is campaigning nationally for food companies to cut salt levels in their products and for the federal government to ban the purchase of sugary drinks with food stamps -- federal vouchers used by 42 million low-income Americans to buy food.

Speaking to Reuters as he was in one of New York's parks, John Warren, a 30-year old financial consultant, said: "It's not (the city's) place to tell me to not smoke out here. This isn't a crowded bar. That I sort of understood."

But Sarah Cohen, 26, who lives in the New York City borough of Brooklyn and works in public relations, said she supported a smoking ban in public outdoor spaces.

"If I'm in a park, surrounded by trees, there shouldn't be smoke in my face. More importantly, kids shouldn't be exposed to cigarette smoke when they are anywhere, whether it's inside or outside. I'm totally in favor," she said.

When Bloomberg announced plans for the ban last month, he said a person sitting within three feet of a smoker outside can be exposed to levels of secondhand smoke similar to those experienced indoors.

The mayor said research showed 65 percent of New Yorkers in favor of such a ban, and that if people do not obey the new law the city's Parks Department would issue a violation summons.

New York City councilwoman Gale Brewer is a sponsor of the bill to expand the smoking ban and said it was not a bid by the city to raise revenue through fines.

"Smoking infringes on public health," Brewer said.

"You can argue by saying you have the right to smoke on a beach or in a park. But a parent has the right to walk by with their child and not have to worry about the potential of an asthma attack," she said.

Several other places in the United States have already banned smoking in public outdoors spaces, including Belmont and Burbank in California and the state of Iowa.

"I think they are over-stepping with this," said Jim Gugliemo, 37, a construction worker and longtime smoker. "I don't think I'm doing anybody any harm by sitting in a park and having a cigarette."

(Editing by Michelle Nichols and Jerry Norton)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (8)
johnnyjr wrote:
“Smoking infringes on public health” — Exactly! Smoking is not a legally protected right, it is a behavior that negatively effects other citizens and therefore can be restricted: As a drinker you don’t have a right to drink and drive; as a driver you don’t have a right to drive 100 miles per hour down a residential street.

In an urban environment there are times when coming into contact with secondhand smoke is unavoidable. Why should I have to be assaulted by smoke while walking down a public sidewalk? As an asthmatic it has immediate negative effects my health.

Oct 20, 2010 11:18am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Adam_S wrote:
“When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross.” Apparently that cross has the CDC logo on it.

Oct 20, 2010 11:21am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Page1News wrote:
Uh, I think NYC has enough on its plate. I’ll light up as government officials ponder their priorities.

Oct 20, 2010 11:33am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.