Moon crash kicks up ice, silver, mercury: NASA

Related Topics

An image of debris, ejected from Cabeus crater and into the sunlight, about 20 seconds after the LCROSS impact. The inset shows a close-up with the direction of the sun and the Earth. REUTERS/Science/AAAS/Handout

An image of debris, ejected from Cabeus crater and into the sunlight, about 20 seconds after the LCROSS impact. The inset shows a close-up with the direction of the sun and the Earth.

Credit: Reuters/Science/AAAS/Handout

WASHINGTON | Thu Oct 21, 2010 2:34pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A rocket sent crashing into the Moon last year kicked up several hundred pounds (kg) of water, silver, mercury and other surprising chemicals, scientists reported on Thursday.

The U.S. space agency NASA sent the rocket to the permanently shadowed moon crater Cabeus last October to see what would, literally, pop up.

Several reports published in the journal Science show some surprising findings, including a large amount of water in the form of ice, carbon monoxide, ammonia and the silvery metals.

"This place looks like it's a treasure chest of elements, of compounds that have been released all over the Moon and they've been put in this bucket in the permanent shadows," planetary geologist Peter Schultz of Brown University in Rhode Island said in a statement.

During the mission, called LCROSS for Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite, the rocket was sent crashing into the dark and freezing crater and instruments on the satellite measured the spectra of light in the dust kicked up.

Anthony Colaprete of the NASA Ames Research Center in Moffett Field, California and his colleagues estimated that 5.6 percent of the total mass inside Cabeus crater is made up of frozen water.

The rocket impact created a crater about 80 to 100 feet wide, sending up somewhere between 9,000 and 13,000 pounds (4,000 and 6,000 kilograms) of debris, dust and vapor, the team estimated.

The silver may just be tiny particles, not in a form that could be mined, the researchers said, and the mercury was an unpleasant surprise in part because there was a lot of it.

"Its toxicity could present a challenge for human exploration," said Kurt Retherford of the Southwest Research Institute in San Antonio, Texas.

(Reporting by Maggie Fox; Editing by Anthony Boadle)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (6)
TipTop wrote:
What did NASA do to ensure that the metals detected were not contamination from its device?

Oct 21, 2010 5:30pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
BBrasky wrote:
They’ll have to find another name for the planet Mercury after this! I hear Pluto was recently made available.

Oct 22, 2010 3:32pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
cobus wrote:
Why is it not viable to mine the silver? Apparently some astronauts have played golf on the moon. Would it not be more productive (in a general sense) to bring back at least a handful of silver ore for testing etc?

Oct 26, 2010 2:32am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.