Appeals court stays ruling on gays in military

SAN FRANCISCO Thu Oct 21, 2010 3:49am EDT

A participant waves a flag during a gay rights demonstration in Washington October 11, 2009. REUTERS/Molly Riley

A participant waves a flag during a gay rights demonstration in Washington October 11, 2009.

Credit: Reuters/Molly Riley

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - A federal appeals court ruled on Wednesday that the Pentagon may temporarily reinstate a ban on openly gay men and women in uniform while a lengthier stay in favor of the "don't ask, don't tell" policy is considered.

The ruling by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco added to the disarray surrounding a landmark legal battle that already has forced the U.S. military to welcome openly gay recruits for the first time.

Siding with the Obama administration, a three-judge appellate panel lifted an injunction issued last week by U.S. District Judge Virginia Phillips that barred further enforcement of a law requiring gay men and lesbians in the armed forces to keep their sexual orientation private.

She refused on Tuesday to lift her own injunction, prompting the administration to petition the appeals court.

Her injunction will now be suspended while the 9th Circuit considers the administration's request for a longer-term stay to remain in effect during the government's overall appeal.

A 9th Circuit ruling on a full-blown stay pending appeal is expected after lawyers for the Log Cabin Republicans, the gay rights group challenging the ban, files its response to that motion in court. The court gave them five days to file.

The group's lead attorney in the case, Dan Woods, called the one-page order from the appeals court a minor setback and said he expected to ultimately prevail in the case.

The emergency stay came as some gay veterans expelled under the "don't ask, don't tell" policy have sought to re-enlist in a test of the lower-court decision. [ID:nN20229503]

The Obama administration insists it supports ending the ban but prefers a political rather than court-imposed remedy, and has urged the courts to give the military more time to make the transition on its own.

Phillips ruled in September that the military's 17-year-old policy infringes on the constitutional free-speech and due-process rights of gay men and women in the armed forces.

She put that opinion into effect on October 12 with a blanket injunction requiring the military to stop enforcing the ban and halt pending investigations and discharges stemming from it.

NEXT STEP IN THE BATTLE

In a sign that the military was abiding by her ruling, the Defense Department said on Tuesday that it had directed its recruiters for the first time to start accepting applications from enlistees who acknowledge they are gay.

Still, the Pentagon has warned that gay service members who reveal their sexual orientation in the midst of the continued legal wrangling run the risk of facing expulsion later if Phillips' ruling is reversed.

If the 9th Circuit ends up denying the administration a longer-term stay, the government is expected to petition the U.S. Supreme Court for review.

In its request before the 9th Circuit, the administration argued that Phillips' injunction "risks causing significant immediate harm to the military and its efforts to be prepared to implement an orderly repeal of the statute."

But Aaron Belkin, director of the Palm Center, UC Santa Barbara think-tank on the subject, said his group's review of 25 foreign militaries, including the armed forces of Britain, Canada, Israel and Australia, found "none reported a single detriment to military readiness or unit cohesion" after opening their ranks to homosexuals.

The legal debate comes at a tough time for Obama and his Democratic allies in Congress, who risk diminishing support from the gay community, a key constituency, as they fight to hold off a possible rout by Republicans in the November 2 elections.

Republicans, many fiercely opposed to gays serving in the military, are seen gaining from any hot-button social issue that could galvanize their conservative base at the polls.

"Don't ask, don't tell" was introduced in 1993 by President Bill Clinton as a compromise between previous regulations that had long excluded gays from the armed forces altogether and a proposal to open the military to gays and lesbians outright.

The new law prohibited commanders from asking service members or recruits about their sexual orientation but subjected troops to expulsion if homosexual behavior on their part was revealed or volunteered.

The Log Cabin Republicans says at least 13,000 men and women have been expelled from the military since "don't ask, don't tell" went into effect.

(Additional reporting by Steve Gorman in Los Angeles; Phil Stewart and Jeremy Pelofsky in Washington; Writing by Steve Gorman; Editing by Doina Chiacu)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (11)
jkerch wrote:
As a military member, you are volunteering to be part of the service. Plus falling under the UCMJ, several of your “rights” are limited due to national security.
This is nothing but Obama trying to make this country look foolish. Don’t try to fix what isn’t broken. This country has one of the finest military forces in the world. Leave it alone.

Oct 21, 2010 8:35am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Bdy2010 wrote:
@jkerch – too late we already look foolish. Imagine what the recruiters are thinking right now. I’m sure the joe’s doing foot-patrols in the Stan are probably wondering why this is bigger news than what is going on over in the war.
I’m having a hard time following this whole mess. The administration wants to lift the ban but they just asked, and received, a stay to keep the ban in place. Is the tail chasing the dog or what?

Oct 21, 2010 10:22am EDT  --  Report as abuse
asalcido wrote:
Every member of the armed services should be treated equally. Sexual preferences should not be anyone’s business. There are rules of conduct and if anyone of these rules are broken then throw them out but these rules are for everyone and not just for a chosen few.

Oct 21, 2010 10:33am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.