Investors Warned of Hidden Financial Risks of Water Shortages

Fri Oct 22, 2010 1:06am EDT

Home Page Title:  Scarce Water Threatens Utility Investors with Hidden Risks From Georgia to California, scarce water a threat to both environmental and financial security colorado_river.jpg

By Lisa Song

An economic study released yesterday on ongoing and worsening water shortages in municipalities from Georgia to California is sending a warning signal to the investment community and highlighting the link between environmental and financial security.

Called The Ripple Effect , the study warns investors of the hidden risks embedded in bonds backing public water utilities and municipal power plants, increasingly vulnerable to water shortages due to climate change.

About 4 in 5 Americans get their water from public water utilities, and public power utilities provide electricity to 45 million people. The two industries are closely linked: power plants are responsible for 41% of national freshwater withdrawals, while water companies depend on electricity to transport water from reservoirs to homes.

"Investors should treat water availability as a growing credit risk," said Mindy Lubber, the President of Ceres, in a news conference. "Ample, long-term water supplies are not a guarantee, and (they are at risk) in many parts of the country."

The report was released by Ceres, a national network of investors and environmentalists working to integrate sustainability into capital markets, and co-authored by PricewaterhouseCoopers and Water Asset Management.

On the Colorado River, the water level in Lake Mead has fallen to historic lows, threatening water deliveries to Arizona and Nevada. In the Southeast, a court ruling could cut nearly 40 percent of Atlanta's water supply by 2012.

Every year, investors spend billions of dollars to finance public water and electric utilities. These projects are funded through municipal bonds, which work like loans that must be repaid over time.

Municipal bonds are scored based on their credit risk, a measurement of how well the utility can repay its debts. However, credit rating agencies don't account for factors such as drought or climate change, said report author Sharlene Leurig.

For example, Los Angeles Department of Water & Power received a high credit score from ratings agencies despite its dependence on the Colorado River. Water levels on the river have fallen so low that the Hoover Dam could stop generating power by 2013—but this potential risk is not reflected in the utility's credit rating, according to the new report.

Bruce Kahn, director and senior investment analyst at Deutsche Bank’s climate change unit, praised the report for highlighting hidden risks. "In recent years, investors like ourselves have been asking how to factor climate change trends into investments," said Kahn, who also served as an expert reviewer for Ripple Effect. "This report is a first step in the right direction."

Lubber of Ceres stressed that the report does not suggest lowering the credit rating of any particular municipal bond. "(It's) merely highlighting the need to take water scarcity into account."

The report focused on 8 public utility bonds from water-stressed regions of the country: Arizona, California, Texas, Alabama and Georgia. According to credit agencies like Moody’s, Standard and Poor’s and Fitch Ratings, all these utilities scored well in terms of credit risk.

"Those agencies are looking at a future that looks just like the past." said Leurig. They are using "cursory analyses” that don't account for environmental or regulatory stresses.

The Ripple Effect seeks to establish a more accurate picture of risk. Using a model developed by PricewaterhouseCoopers, the report gave each utility a "water risk score" based on analysis that incorporated droughts, climate change scenarios, and water demand projections from 2011-2030.

"By coupling the water risk scores with other financial information already available in credit rating opinions and bond documents, investors can gain a more complete picture of a bond’s total risk profile," wrote the authors of the report.

Los Angeles received the highest water risk score. The fast-growing city relies on the Colorado River, which is facing its 11th year of drought. The report concluded that the city could face undersupply from all sources by as early as 2013.

Atlanta, which has seen its water rights slashed by a federal ruling, had the second highest risk, followed by Glendale, Arizona which only has junior rights to water on the Colorado River and limited reservoir storage facilities.

Dallas, Texas received the lowest water risk score, but neighboring Tarrant County, which uses the same water supply (Trinity River), had a much higher risk. That's because Tarrant County relies more on surface water storage, which is vulnerable to drought.

PowerSouth Energy Cooperative, an electric utility in Alabama, was at high risk due to warming temperatures. The utility may face temporary shutdowns if river water becomes too warm to cool the coal-fired power plants.

Regardless of the individual scenarios, Leurig said public utilities need to improve disclosures of water-related risks in order for public utilities to maintain trust with the investment community.

Lubber added that the report is not just about better risk disclosure. The report recommends that water utilities encourage water conservation; rating agencies should consider water stress scenarios and factor water intensity into credit ratings for electric utilities.

"Water shortages are happening now, and they have an impact," said Lubber. Investors are threatened by these trends, and the financial community needs new models and better disclosure to deal with the coming changes.

(Photo: by Marcin Klapczynski)

 

Comments (0)
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.