Sponsored Links

Invasive species and climate change a "deadly duo": report

SINGAPORE | Fri Oct 22, 2010 3:25am EDT

SINGAPORE (Reuters) - Climate change is set to drive the spread of invasive plant and animals species, threatening forests, fisheries and crops, in a double blow to nature and livelihoods, a World Bank-funded report said on Friday.

The study by Nairobi-based Global Invasive Species Programme says a warmer world, more extreme weather and higher levels of planet-warming carbon dioxide will give some species an edge, devastating ecosystems at sea and on land.

"The estimated damage from invasive species worldwide totals more than $1.4 trillion annually -- 5 percent of the global economy," says the report issued on the sidelines of a major U.N. meeting in Japan aimed at combating the destruction of nature.

The United Nations says climate change, pollution, deforestation and over-hunting have led to a rapid rise in extinctions, threatening the richness of nature that underpins services such as clean air, water as well as food and health.

"Individually, climate change and invasive species present two of the greatest threats to biodiversity and the provision of valuable ecosystem services," says the report for policymakers.

It outlines myriad examples of invasive plants and animals that have proven much more adept at survival than other local species, leading to erosion, damage to crops, livestock and fisheries and lost income for tourism.

In particular, climate change can lead to some local species becoming much less able to adapt to warmer temperatures or more extreme droughts and floods, making them vulnerable to other species that have much greater tolerance levels.

In some cases, invasive species can also curb the amount of carbon dioxide that nature can soak up from the atmosphere.

In North America, warmer winter temperatures have led to an explosion in the numbers of native mountain pine beetles, killing off large areas of forest.

GREEN CRABS, LIONFISH

In the Caribbean, the lionfish, which is native to coral reefs in the South Pacific, Indian Ocean and Red Sea, has quickly spread since first released in the mid-1980s.

The fish is a voracious predator with venomous spines and has no natural enemies in the Caribbean, threatening local fish, shrimp and crab populations. Warming ocean temperatures in the region have helped it thrive.

Along the west coast of the United States and Canada, the European green crab is threatening native clam, mussel and crab species and possibly arrived in ship ballast water.

Weeds, pests and diseases were also a growing threat to agriculture, the study says, undermining food security.

"Indirectly, climate change will impact agriculture by increasing the incidence and intensity of invasive species," says the report. Agriculture supports the livelihoods of more than a third of the world's population.

The study also pointed to the likely spread of diseases such as bird flu, plague, Rift Valley fever, dengue, ebola and malaria. "Climate change combined with global trade and transport networks may significantly increase the threat of such pandemics," the authors say.

The study urged policymakers to take steps to halt the spread of non-native species, develop early detection systems, restore and protect existing ecosystems to make them more resilient and eradicate or control species that limit nature's ability to soak up carbon.

(Editing by Miral Fahmy)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
donm wrote:
Two and a half years ago in 2008, after historic legislation for a Coast Guard Authorization bill to protect all states equally from ballast water passed the house astoundingly 395-7, only to be killed by one Senator Boxer, this administration just left ballast water out of the 2010 Coast Guard Authorization. Instead we have a significantly longer, still purposed non-legislative, and jurisdictionally divided plan for several parts of the federal government to try and enforce.
This Administration has chosen to leave all the states in economic competition with one another while dealing with an international organization of economic interest (IMO).
NY may have just been wasting money, if they are going to issue passes for an indefinete period of time to develope or install technology?
NY is in a position to economically affect all the Great Lakes states and Canada as well in the presidential election year 2012.
Why is the President allowing all this money to be wasted by the states, when he could fix the problem and put American manufacturing on a level playing field with foreign goods? You would think it would be a priority for a “green” president to keep our waters clean. (equally for all Americans)
The question is will NY just quit on the money spent for strong legislation if the Coast Guard ever decides on any plan, no matter how weak? This Administrations current plan of inaction is hurting our economy, while waiting for economic globalization to increase as our economic answer.

Oct 22, 2010 5:14pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.