Autism rates stabilize in Wisconsin schools: study

Related Topics

Autistic children attend a therapy session at a school for autistic children in Tianjin municipality March 31, 2010. REUTERS/Vincent Du

Autistic children attend a therapy session at a school for autistic children in Tianjin municipality March 31, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Vincent Du

NEW YORK | Mon Oct 25, 2010 11:26am EDT

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Autism rates could be leveling off at just above one percent of children, Wisconsin researchers suggest.

Between 2002 and 2008, they found the number of kids in the state's special education autism category nearly doubled. But the increase was only seen in those schools that started out with very few autistic kids, hinting that the statewide rates may be stabilizing.

Autism spectrum disorders, which range from mild Asperger's Syndrome to severe mental retardation and social disability, affect about one in 110 children in the U.S., according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Nationwide, the number has been rising inexplicably over recent decades, and experts have argued about the reasons.

One possibility is that kids who used to be classified as mentally retarded, or just plain eccentric, are now getting an autism-spectrum diagnosis. Another, more worrisome suggestion, is that some environmental factor could be impacting children's brain development.

The new study hints that at least some of the increase could be due to schools putting more and more kids in the autism category, said Matthew Maenner, a PhD student at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, who worked on the new study.

"The prevalence of autism in special education doesn't seem to be the same everywhere, and it doesn't seem to be increasing at the same rate everywhere," he said.

The findings, published in the journal Pediatrics, show that the statewide rate of children receiving special education for autism went from five to nine cases per 1,000 over seven years.

Not all of these kids may have a medical diagnosis of autism, but Maenner said data on enrollment in special education programs are often used as a proxy for the prevalence of disabilities.

Schools varied widely in the number of autistic children they had. But over time, the gap narrowed from a spread of more than 24 times to less than two.

The schools with more than one percent autistic kids at the beginning of the study period saw little or no change.

Dr. John Harrington, an autism expert who was not involved in the research, said it looked as if the autism rate could be stabilizing.

"As you get better at identifying something, your numbers get less varied," he told Reuters Health. "Finally we can look at these kids and say, they are not just odd, they have a diagnosis."

Harrington, who wrote a commentary on the new findings, said he believed the same patterns could be found in other parts of the country.

But he stressed they don't necessarily mean that the national increase in autism is solely driven by better diagnoses.

"Most of the experts don't want to hang their hat on it and say we're just calling a chicken a rooster," said Harrington, of the Eastern Virginia Medical School in Norfolk.

Last year, the CDC estimated that autism rates had gone up by 60 percent for boys since 2002 and 48 percent for girls.

"There's a multi-pronged approach going on because we know that there is no single cause for autism. We're not going to find the one answer," the CDC's Catherine Rice told Reuters at the time.

SOURCE: link.reuters.com/gas77m Pediatrics, October 18, 2010.

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
maurinemeleck wrote:
Any study or any excuse they can think of to exonerate vaccines–better diagnosing, fewer children with mental retardation, young mothers, old fathers, cold mothers,
bold fathers, too much tv, too much rain,
prevalence and not real numbers, genetic, prophetic, someday they’ll regret it.
Maurine meleck, SC

Oct 25, 2010 4:45pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
PBMom wrote:
The rate of autism is not leveling out. To do a study that tracks autism based on school population is grossly flawed. Let me tell you why based on what I know from our own state of Texas. Taxpayer-funded school attorneys have warned school officials that a tsunami of kids with autism are coming through & their budgets cannot handle it. So they have advised them a two-pronged approach: Get rid of the kids that are in school now by providing below-minimum education, and 2) don’t let any kids with autism except the most severe have services. How do they get away with this? The school does not have to accept the doctor’s diagnosis. They form their own committee of unqualified people and they tell the parents based on what they have “tested”, the child does not have autism. Therefore, no services will be provided. The parent at that point can ask for an IEE and appeal that decision, and the schools will let you, but the minimum amount they would spend on it versus the months it will take to get it done, get the results back, etc. bides them time. Plan for them to disagree with whatever the IEE comes back as. At that point, you will have to hire an attorney to go to due process where parents only prevail in Texas 5% of the time because of the bias in the system. All the “independent” hearing officers are generally former school district lawyers or Texas Education Agency lawyers. If you win, you better believe they will appeal it to the 5th Circuit Court, again costing taxpayers money, but lawyers inform them that they have to do this because if they don’t they will set precedent for a flood of other cases to win. Now, on the other hand, in cases like my child, they would not even let ME pay for the training of the teacher, at which point, you know it has become about politics and not about my child. I removed him from the district and despite the 5% odds, am going to fight them, which will cost me a minimum of $30,000. Most parents at this point just cut their losses and either find a private school or homeschool or leave for another state or school district with a better reputation within the state. In my state it is legal to audiotape conversations as long as 1 person (you) knows it is being taped, and the things I found out in my child’s classroom would disgust anyone. Most cannot afford private school for autism, especially if you are on the severe spectrum, because it generally costs $50,000 and up per year. School is providing nothing more than glorified babysitting. My son did more in the first 9 days of his new school than school did in 6 years. My son is 14. The district claimed they never heard my child speak. We had. The bus driver had. The grocery store clerk had. My so-called nonverbal child has been talking up a storm at his new school. Why would you want to talk in a place that has written you off as stupid and noneducable. I have statements from the school districts saying this, “given his limited intelligence, how many words do you think he can learn in one year.” And last year being told that, “Perhaps 6 new words a school year is just shooting too high.”

Oct 25, 2010 6:20pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
SuefromSault wrote:
I feel bad for all you mommies and daddies who have autistic children. But you seem to be out of touch with reality. Do you feel equally bad for those of us who have children who have other genetic defects?

Life sucks. In the past most defective fetuses were spontaneously aborted (by god if you will – now modern medicine plays god and “saves” them) When they are “saved” they cause life long agony for their parents.

Denying that life sucks (and believing you should have more resources than others with similar problems) does NOT solve this problem. You are no more special than the family whos healthy happy son comes home from Afghanistan a vegable or a family whose baby dies of SIDS or etc etc.

Oct 25, 2010 11:49pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.