Key Pennsylvania Senate race in dead heat: Reuters/Ipsos

WASHINGTON Tue Oct 26, 2010 5:47pm EDT

Pennsylvania Republican senatorial candidate Pat Toomey (L) shakes hands with Democratic senatorial candidate Congressman Joe Sestak before their debate at the National Constitution Center in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, October 20, 2010. REUTERS/Tim Shaffer

Pennsylvania Republican senatorial candidate Pat Toomey (L) shakes hands with Democratic senatorial candidate Congressman Joe Sestak before their debate at the National Constitution Center in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, October 20, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Tim Shaffer

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A Senate race in Pennsylvania that could determine whether President Barack Obama's Democrats retain control of the chamber is deadlocked one week before the election, a Reuters/Ipsos poll showed on Tuesday.

Democrat Joe Sestak has gained ground on Republican Pat Toomey after accusing him of wanting to export U.S. jobs to China and both candidates are now level on 46 percent.

Republicans are expected to win control of the House of Representatives in next Tuesday's election as voters give low marks to Obama's handling of the sluggish economy.

It is unclear whether the Republicans will be able to pick up the 10 seats needed to win control of the Senate as well.

Pennsylvania, many of whose big industries have been hit in the economic downturn, is one of a handful of close races that could determine the balance of power.

While dozens of Democrats across the country may lose their seats due to the 9.6 percent unemployment, Sestak appears to have turned the issue to his favor.

He has hammered Toomey's support of free-trade policies and even suggested in one advertisement that Toomey "ought to run for Senate in China." Many Americans resent the rapid rise of cheaper manufacturing in China that has cut into U.S. jobs.

Sestak was ten points behind the Republican, a former derivatives trader, in the last Reuters/Ipsos poll in Pennsylvania in late August.

AMERICAN INDUSTRY

"Sestak's campaign made a concerted effort to talk about how they're the candidate who stands for American industry versus Toomey, who stands for Wall Street," said Ipsos senior research manager Chris Jackson. "They have been able to take that particular issue and twist it to their advantage."

In Tuesday's poll, some 48 percent of those surveyed said free trade subjected U.S. companies to unfair competition from cheap labor abroad, while 44 percent said free trade was good because it opened up global markets.

By a margin of 37 percent to 31 percent, voters said Sestak would do a better job than Toomey of keeping jobs in the United States. More voters also said Sestak would be better at dealing with China and standing up for U.S. interests.

Toomey was seen as more likely to balance the budget by a margin of 36 percent to 28 percent. The two candidates were seen as equal on creating jobs in the state.

In the Pennsylvania governor's race, Republican Tom Corbett held a 6-point lead over Democrat Dan Onorato, 49 percent to 43 percent. Corbett's lead has shrunk from the 15-point advantage he held in August in the race to succeed Ed Rendell, a Democrat who is stepping down after two terms.

Pennsylvania voters identified jobs and the economy as the biggest problem facing the state, mirroring results from polls in other states.

Ipsos surveyed 600 Pennsylvania adults between Friday and Sunday, and 400 of those surveyed were identified as likely voters. The survey has a margin of error of 4.9 percentage points for likely voters.

(Reporting by Andy Sullivan; Editing by David Storey)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (30)
cynicalme wrote:
So 46% of the population will vote FOR continuing the greatest housing crisis, the greatest banking crisis, the highest unemployment, the ongoing wars, healthcare legislative mess and greatest environmental disaster ever……. wow, are people nuts … or is this indicative of a dogmatic adherence to party regardless of how incompetent they are??

Oct 26, 2010 1:40pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Ryujin wrote:
One hand you have some republican presidents that cause a separation between high and middlelow class or the bush era policies that created this crisis before the Obama came to office. Its interesting how people like cynicalme think that economic strategy is determined by party, during the bush era those policies were supported by both dems and reps, its not about party its who you think will get the job done.

Oct 26, 2010 1:54pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
ginchinchili wrote:
cynicalme: I totally agree. Do people really want to see our economy fall back into a tailspin? Well, the good news is that people seem to finally be coming to their senses. Better late than never.

Maybe enough people will realize in time that at least our economy is on the mend and it would be economic suicide to rush back to the party that stands by and does nothing as Rome is burning to the ground. Oh yeah, they do propose more tax cuts for the richest 2% of Americans and we can count on more war. And throw in more tax breaks for corporations to ship jobs overseas. That’s really worked out well for us, hasn’t it?

Thank God Americans are realizing that it will take longer than 2 years to get us out of the mess Bush and the Republicans got us into. Last time we had an economic collapse like this one it took us 10 years. Right now we are running well ahead of that. It would be insane/stupid to reverse our forward progress at this point.

Oct 26, 2010 2:02pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.