Sponsored Links

UK airline chief criticizes U.S. security demands

Related Topics

A British Airways passenger jet taxis past parked BA jets at Heathrow airport in London July 30, 2010. REUTERS/Luke MacGregor

A British Airways passenger jet taxis past parked BA jets at Heathrow airport in London July 30, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Luke MacGregor

LONDON | Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:07pm EDT

LONDON (Reuters) - The chairman of British Airways has criticized airport checks as "completely redundant" and said Britain should stop "kowtowing" to U.S. demands for increased security, the Financial Times reported on Wednesday.

The newspaper quoted Martin Broughton as saying at the annual conference of the UK Airport Operators Association in London on Tuesday that no one wanted weak security.

Broughton said, however, the practice of forcing people to take off their shoes and have their laptops checked separately in security lines should be ditched.

"We all know there's quite a number of elements in the security program which are completely redundant," he said.

Broughton said there was no need to "kowtow to the Americans every time they wanted something done" to beef up security on U.S.-bound flights, especially when this involved checks the United States did not impose on its own domestic routes.

"America does not do internally a lot of the things they demand that we do. We shouldn't stand for that," he said.

"We should say, "We'll only do things which we consider to be essential and that you Americans also consider essential'."

The Financial Times said Broughton's comments reflected broader industry and passenger frustration over the steady accumulation of rules on everything from onboard liquids to hand baggage that had been adopted since the Sept 11, 2001 attacks.

No comment on Broughton's remarks was immediately available from British government or airport officials.

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
edgyinchina wrote:
Finally, someone stands up for common sense and logic. However, I doubt the bunker minded Americans (that’s me) will go for this, as they are still hunkered down in their bunker attitude….

Oct 26, 2010 10:01pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
myxsix wrote:
it is about time more countries begin standing up to the US. Perhaps we can then next focus on decoupling and leave the US out in the cold until it learns to behave like a good neighbor and not a bully. After all, much of the security concerns we all have now stem from aggressive and hawkish US foreign policy. Good by America, hello peace.

Oct 26, 2010 10:12pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Panruka wrote:
I think it’s idiotic that Airline Pilots have to go through security at Airports. If a pilot wanted to kill everyone on a plane he or she would not need a bomb to do so.

Oct 26, 2010 12:16am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.